These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2381185)

  • 1. Speech naturalness ratings of treated stutterers.
    Runyan CM; Bell JN; Prosek RA
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1990 Aug; 55(3):434-8. PubMed ID: 2381185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Stutterers' self-ratings of speech naturalness: assessing effects and reliability.
    Ingham RJ; Ingham JC; Onslow M; Finn P
    J Speech Hear Res; 1989 Jun; 32(2):419-31. PubMed ID: 2739391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Modification of listener-judged naturalness in the speech of stutterers.
    Ingham RJ; Martin RR; Haroldson SK; Onslow M; Leney M
    J Speech Hear Res; 1985 Dec; 28(4):495-504. PubMed ID: 4087884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Acoustic and psychophysical dimensions of the perceived speech naturalness of nonstutterers and posttreatment stutterers.
    Metz DE; Schiavetti N; Sacco PR
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1990 Aug; 55(3):516-25. PubMed ID: 2381193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Measurement and modification of speech naturalness during stuttering therapy.
    Ingham RJ; Onslow M
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1985 Aug; 50(3):261-81. PubMed ID: 4021454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Speech naturalness and prolonged-speech treatments for stuttering: further variables and data.
    Onslow M; Hayes B; Hutchins L; Newman D
    J Speech Hear Res; 1992 Apr; 35(2):274-82. PubMed ID: 1573867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The relationship of stuttering severity and treatment length to temporal measures of stutterers' perceptually fluent speech.
    Healey EC; Ramig PR
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1989 Aug; 54(3):313-9. PubMed ID: 2755095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Post-treatment speech naturalness of comprehensive stuttering program clients and differences in ratings among listener groups.
    Teshima S; Langevin M; Hagler P; Kully D
    J Fluency Disord; 2010 Mar; 35(1):44-58. PubMed ID: 20412982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Perceptual rating instrument for speech evaluation of stuttering treatment.
    Franken MC; Boves L; Peters HF; Webster RL
    J Speech Hear Res; 1995 Apr; 38(2):280-8. PubMed ID: 7596094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Interpreting results of the fluent speech paradigm in stuttering research: difficulties in separating cause from effect.
    Armson J; Kalinowski J
    J Speech Hear Res; 1994 Feb; 37(1):69-82. PubMed ID: 8170133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Preparation time and response complexity effects on stutterers' and nonstutterers' acoustic LRT.
    Dembowski J; Watson BC
    J Speech Hear Res; 1991 Feb; 34(1):49-59. PubMed ID: 2008080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Stuttering and speech naturalness.
    Martin RR; Haroldson SK; Triden KA
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1984 Feb; 49(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 6700202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of stutterers' and nonstutterers' affective, cognitive, and behavioral self-reports.
    Watson JB
    J Speech Hear Res; 1988 Sep; 31(3):377-85. PubMed ID: 3172754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Psychophysical analysis of audiovisual judgments of speech naturalness of nonstutterers and stutterers.
    Schiavetti N; Martin RR; Haroldson SK; Metz DE
    J Speech Hear Res; 1994 Feb; 37(1):46-52. PubMed ID: 8170130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Kinematic analysis of lip closure in stutterers' fluent speech.
    McClean MD; Kroll RM; Loftus NS
    J Speech Hear Res; 1990 Dec; 33(4):755-60. PubMed ID: 2273888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Subvocalization and reading rate differences between stuttering and nonstuttering children and adults.
    Bosshardt HG
    J Speech Hear Res; 1990 Dec; 33(4):776-85. PubMed ID: 2273890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Physiological differences between stutterers and nonstutterers in perceptually fluent speech: EMG amplitude and duration.
    van Lieshout PH; Peters HF; Starkweather CW; Hulstijn W
    J Speech Hear Res; 1993 Feb; 36(1):55-63. PubMed ID: 8450665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Stutterers' self-ratings of how natural speech sounds and feels.
    Finn P; Ingham RJ
    J Speech Hear Res; 1994 Apr; 37(2):326-40. PubMed ID: 8028313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Perceptual assessment of normalcy of speech following stuttering therapy.
    Ingham RJ; Packman AC
    J Speech Hear Res; 1978 Mar; 21(1):63-73. PubMed ID: 642489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Formant frequencies of stuttered and fluent vowels.
    Prosek RA; Montgomery AA; Walden BE; Hawkins DB
    J Speech Hear Res; 1987 Sep; 30(3):301-5. PubMed ID: 3669636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.