279 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23812241)
21. Major adverse cardiac events and the severity of coronary atherosclerosis assessed by computed tomography coronary angiography in an outpatient population with suspected or known coronary artery disease.
Aldrovandi A; Maffei E; Seitun S; Martini C; Berti E; Grilli R; Messalli G; Weustink AC; Mollet NR; Nieman K; Ardissino D; de Feyter PJ; Krestin GP; Cademartiri F
J Thorac Imaging; 2012 Jan; 27(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 21052023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography: a prospective, multicenter, multivendor study.
Meijboom WB; Meijs MF; Schuijf JD; Cramer MJ; Mollet NR; van Mieghem CA; Nieman K; van Werkhoven JM; Pundziute G; Weustink AC; de Vos AM; Pugliese F; Rensing B; Jukema JW; Bax JJ; Prokop M; Doevendans PA; Hunink MG; Krestin GP; de Feyter PJ
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2008 Dec; 52(25):2135-44. PubMed ID: 19095130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. CT Coronary Angiography vs. Coronary Artery Calcium Scoring for the Occupational Assessment of Military Aircrew.
Parsons I; Pavitt C; Chamley R; d'Arcy J; Nicol E
Aerosp Med Hum Perform; 2017 Feb; 88(2):76-81. PubMed ID: 28095950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. First head-to-head comparison of effective radiation dose from low-dose 64-slice CT with prospective ECG-triggering versus invasive coronary angiography.
Herzog BA; Wyss CA; Husmann L; Gaemperli O; Valenta I; Treyer V; Landmesser U; Kaufmann PA
Heart; 2009 Oct; 95(20):1656-61. PubMed ID: 19581273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Preserved coronary flow reserve effectively excludes high-risk coronary artery disease on angiography.
Naya M; Murthy VL; Taqueti VR; Foster CR; Klein J; Garber M; Dorbala S; Hainer J; Blankstein R; Resnic F; Di Carli MF
J Nucl Med; 2014 Feb; 55(2):248-55. PubMed ID: 24408896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Does coronary CT angiography improve risk stratification over coronary calcium scoring in symptomatic patients with suspected coronary artery disease? Results from the prospective multicenter international CONFIRM registry.
Al-Mallah MH; Qureshi W; Lin FY; Achenbach S; Berman DS; Budoff MJ; Callister TQ; Chang HJ; Cademartiri F; Chinnaiyan K; Chow BJ; Cheng VY; Delago A; Gomez M; Hadamitzky M; Hausleiter J; Kaufmann PA; Leipsic J; Maffei E; Raff G; Shaw LJ; Villines TC; Cury RC; Feuchtner G; Plank F; Kim YJ; Dunning AM; Min JK
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2014 Mar; 15(3):267-74. PubMed ID: 23966421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Hybrid imaging using quantitative H215O PET and CT-based coronary angiography for the detection of coronary artery disease.
Danad I; Raijmakers PG; Appelman YE; Harms HJ; de Haan S; van den Oever ML; Heymans MW; Tulevski II; van Kuijk C; Hoekstra OS; Lammertsma AA; Lubberink M; van Rossum AC; Knaapen P
J Nucl Med; 2013 Jan; 54(1):55-63. PubMed ID: 23232274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Usefulness of additional coronary calcium scoring in low-dose CT coronary angiography with prospective ECG-triggering impact on total effective radiation dose and diagnostic accuracy.
Husmann L; Herzog BA; Burger IA; Buechel RR; Pazhenkottil AP; von Schulthess P; Wyss CA; Gaemperli O; Landmesser U; Kaufmann PA
Acad Radiol; 2010 Feb; 17(2):201-6. PubMed ID: 19944630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Quantitative computed tomographic coronary angiography: does it predict functionally significant coronary stenoses?
Rossi A; Papadopoulou SL; Pugliese F; Russo B; Dharampal AS; Dedic A; Kitslaar PH; Broersen A; Meijboom WB; van Geuns RJ; Wragg A; Ligthart J; Schultz C; Petersen SE; Nieman K; Krestin GP; de Feyter PJ
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2014 Jan; 7(1):43-51. PubMed ID: 24280729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Detection and characterization of coronary bifurcation lesions with 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography.
Van Mieghem CA; Thury A; Meijboom WB; Cademartiri F; Mollet NR; Weustink AC; Sianos G; de Jaegere PP; Serruys PW; de Feyter P
Eur Heart J; 2007 Aug; 28(16):1968-76. PubMed ID: 17623681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Incremental predictive value for obstructive coronary artery disease by combination of Duke Clinical Score and Agatston score.
Takamura K; Kondo T; Fujimoto S; Hiki M; Matsumori R; Kawaguchi Y; Amanuma M; Takase S; Daida H
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 May; 17(5):550-6. PubMed ID: 26420291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Is there a difference in the diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography coronary angiography between women and men?
Dharampal AS; Rossi A; Papadopoulou SL; Weustink AC; Boersma E; Nieman K; Chen CH; Dijkshoorn M; Mollet NR; Krestin GP; de Feyter PJ
Coron Artery Dis; 2011; 22(6):421-7. PubMed ID: 21606842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Diagnostic accuracy of dual-source CT coronary angiography: The effect of average heart rate, heart rate variability, and calcium score in a clinical perspective.
Zhang LJ; Wu SY; Wang J; Lu Y; Zhang ZL; Jiang SS; Zhou CS; Lu GM
Acta Radiol; 2010 Sep; 51(7):727-40. PubMed ID: 20707657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with high, intermediate, or low pretest probability of significant coronary artery disease.
Meijboom WB; van Mieghem CA; Mollet NR; Pugliese F; Weustink AC; van Pelt N; Cademartiri F; Nieman K; Boersma E; de Jaegere P; Krestin GP; de Feyter PJ
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2007 Oct; 50(15):1469-75. PubMed ID: 17919567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Cost-effectiveness analysis of stand-alone or combined non-invasive imaging tests for the diagnosis of stable coronary artery disease: results from the EVINCI study.
Lorenzoni V; Bellelli S; Caselli C; Knuuti J; Underwood SR; Neglia D; Turchetti G;
Eur J Health Econ; 2019 Dec; 20(9):1437-1449. PubMed ID: 31410670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Diagnostic performance of 64-multidetector row coronary computed tomographic angiography for evaluation of coronary artery stenosis in individuals without known coronary artery disease: results from the prospective multicenter ACCURACY (Assessment by Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography of Individuals Undergoing Invasive Coronary Angiography) trial.
Budoff MJ; Dowe D; Jollis JG; Gitter M; Sutherland J; Halamert E; Scherer M; Bellinger R; Martin A; Benton R; Delago A; Min JK
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2008 Nov; 52(21):1724-32. PubMed ID: 19007693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The External Validity of Prediction Models for the Diagnosis of Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease in Patients With Stable Chest Pain: Insights From the PROMISE Trial.
Genders TSS; Coles A; Hoffmann U; Patel MR; Mark DB; Lee KL; Steyerberg EW; Hunink MGM; Douglas PS;
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2018 Mar; 11(3):437-446. PubMed ID: 28624401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Clinical outcomes and health care costs of transferring rural Western Australians for invasive coronary angiography, and a cost-effective alternative care model: a retrospective cross-sectional study.
Alexander M; Lan NSR; Dallo MJ; Briffa TG; Sanfilippo FM; Hooper A; Bartholomew H; Hii L; Hillis GS; McQuillan BM; Dwivedi G; Rankin JM; Ihdayhid AR
Med J Aust; 2023 Aug; 219(4):155-161. PubMed ID: 37403443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Stress-ECG vs. CT coronary angiography for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease: a "real-world" experience.
Maffei E; Palumbo A; Martini C; Cuttone A; Ugo F; Emiliano E; Menozzi A; Vignali L; Brambilla V; Coruzzi P; Weustink A; Mollet N; Ardissino D; Reverberi C; Crisi G; Cademartiri F
Radiol Med; 2010 Apr; 115(3):354-67. PubMed ID: 19902329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Prognostic value of CT coronary angiography: focus on obstructive vs. nonobstructive disease and on the presence of left main disease.
Maffei E; Seitun S; Martini C; Aldrovandi A; Arcadi T; Clemente A; Messalli G; Malagò R; Weustink A; Mollet N; Nieman K; Ardissino D; de Feyter P; Krestin G; Cademartiri F
Radiol Med; 2011 Feb; 116(1):15-31. PubMed ID: 20927651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]