168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23812585)
1. Are modern voice prostheses better? A lifetime comparison of 749 voice prostheses.
Kress P; Schäfer P; Schwerdtfeger FP; Rösler S
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2014 Jan; 271(1):133-40. PubMed ID: 23812585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [The costs for different voice prostheses depending on the lifetime].
Schuldt T; Ovari A; Dommerich S
Laryngorhinootologie; 2013 Jun; 92(6):389-93. PubMed ID: 23670563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. In vitro biofilm growth on modern voice prostheses.
Leonhard M; Zatorska B; Tan Y; Moser D; Schneider-Stickler B
Head Neck; 2018 Apr; 40(4):763-769. PubMed ID: 29286184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Tracheo-esophageal Puncture (TEP) for Voice Rehabilitation in Laryngectomised Patients Blom-singer® Vs Provox® Prosthesis : Our Experience.
Ramalingam W; Chikara D; Rajagopal G; Mehta AR; Sarkar S
Med J Armed Forces India; 2007 Jan; 63(1):15-8. PubMed ID: 27407929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Voice restoration with voice prosthesis after total laryngectomy. Assessment of survival time of 378 Provox-1, Provox-2 and Blom-Singer voice prosthesis].
Schäfer P; Klützke N; Schwerdtfeger FP
Laryngorhinootologie; 2001 Nov; 80(11):677-81. PubMed ID: 11702284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prospective clinical phase II study of two new indwelling voice prostheses (Provox Vega 22.5 and 20 Fr) and a novel anterograde insertion device (Provox Smart Inserter).
Hilgers FJ; Ackerstaff AH; Jacobi I; Balm AJ; Tan IB; van den Brekel MW
Laryngoscope; 2010 Jun; 120(6):1135-43. PubMed ID: 20513030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prospective randomized comparative study of tracheoesophageal voice prosthesis: Blom-Singer versus Provox.
Delsupehe K; Zink I; Lejaegere M; Delaere P
Laryngoscope; 1998 Oct; 108(10):1561-5. PubMed ID: 9778302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical phase I/feasibility study of the next generation indwelling Provox voice prosthesis (Provox Vega).
Hilgers FJ; Ackerstaff AH; van Rossum M; Jacobi I; Balm AJ; Tan IB; van den Brekel MW
Acta Otolaryngol; 2010 Apr; 130(4):511-9. PubMed ID: 19895334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Clinical use of a voice prosthesis with a flap valve containing silver oxide (Blom-Singer Advantage), biofilm formation, in-situ lifetime and indication].
Kress P; Schäfer P; Schwerdtfeger FP
Laryngorhinootologie; 2006 Dec; 85(12):893-6. PubMed ID: 16612757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Long-term outcomes and cost-effectiveness of a magnet-based valve voice prosthesis for endoprosthesis leakage treatment.
Mayo-Yáñez M; Chiesa-Estomba C; Lechien JR; Calvo-Henríquez C; Vaira LA; Cabo-Varela I
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2022 Aug; 279(8):4167-4172. PubMed ID: 35217904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Double Blind Study Investigating the Effect of Different Voice Prostheses on Ease of Swallowing and Residue Post Laryngectomy.
Coffey MM; Tolley N; Howard D; Hickson M
Dysphagia; 2018 Oct; 33(5):616-626. PubMed ID: 29460049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Use of double flange voice prosthesis for periprosthetic leakage in laryngectomised patients: A prospective case-crossover study.
Mayo-Yáñez M; Cabo-Varela I; Suanzes-Hernández J; Calvo-Henríquez C; Chiesa-Estomba C; Herranz González-Botas J
Clin Otolaryngol; 2020 May; 45(3):389-393. PubMed ID: 32017429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Long-term results of Provox ActiValve, solving the problem of frequent candida- and "underpressure"-related voice prosthesis replacements.
Soolsma J; van den Brekel MW; Ackerstaff AH; Balm AJ; Tan B; Hilgers FJ
Laryngoscope; 2008 Feb; 118(2):252-7. PubMed ID: 18090869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparison of survival lifetime of the Provox and the Provox2 voice prosthesis.
Lequeux T; Badreldin A; Saussez S; Thill MP; Oujjan L; Chantrain G
J Laryngol Otol; 2003 Nov; 117(11):875-8. PubMed ID: 14670148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Voice rehabilitation after laryngectomy. Initial clinical experience with the Provox-Vega® voice prosthesis and the SmartInserter® system].
Lorenz KJ; Maier H
HNO; 2010 Dec; 58(12):1174-83. PubMed ID: 20734017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Provox 2
Mayo-Yáñez M; Cabo-Varela I; Dovalo-Carballo L; Calvo-Henríquez C; Martínez-Morán A; Herranz González-Botas J
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2018 Jul; 275(7):1827-1830. PubMed ID: 29799083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Device Life of Two Generations of Provox Voice Prostheses.
Thylur DS; Villegas BC; Fisher LM; Sinha UK; Kokot N
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2016 Jun; 125(6):501-7. PubMed ID: 26747630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A prospective, randomized comparative study of patient perceptions and preferences of two types of indwelling voice prostheses.
Hancock K; Ward E; Lawson N; van As-Brooks CJ
Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2012; 47(3):300-9. PubMed ID: 22512515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A new problem-solving indwelling voice prosthesis, eliminating the need for frequent Candida- and "underpressure"-related replacements: Provox ActiValve.
Hilgers FJ; Ackerstaff AH; Balm AJ; Van den Brekel MW; Bing Tan I; Persson JO
Acta Otolaryngol; 2003 Oct; 123(8):972-9. PubMed ID: 14606602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Device life of the Provox Vega voice prosthesis.
Hancock KL; Lawson NR; Ward EC
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2013 Mar; 270(4):1447-53. PubMed ID: 22941391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
