These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23812957)

  • 1. Are explanatory trials ethical? Shifting the burden of justification in clinical trial design.
    Borgerson K
    Theor Med Bioeth; 2013 Aug; 34(4):293-308. PubMed ID: 23812957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Stakeholder views regarding ethical issues in the design and conduct of pragmatic trials: study protocol.
    Nicholls SG; Carroll K; Brehaut J; Weijer C; Hey SP; Goldstein CE; Zwarenstein M; Graham ID; McKenzie JE; McIntyre L; Jairath V; Campbell MK; Grimshaw JM; Fergusson DA; Taljaard M
    BMC Med Ethics; 2018 Nov; 19(1):90. PubMed ID: 30458809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Developing a framework for the ethical design and conduct of pragmatic trials in healthcare: a mixed methods research protocol.
    Taljaard M; Weijer C; Grimshaw JM; Ali A; Brehaut JC; Campbell MK; Carroll K; Edwards S; Eldridge S; Forrest CB; Giraudeau B; Goldstein CE; Graham ID; Hemming K; Hey SP; Horn AR; Jairath V; Klassen TP; London AJ; Marlin S; Marshall JC; McIntyre L; McKenzie JE; Nicholls SG; Alison Paprica P; Zwarenstein M; Fergusson DA
    Trials; 2018 Sep; 19(1):525. PubMed ID: 30261933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
    Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W
    Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The ethical challenges raised in the design and conduct of pragmatic trials: an interview study with key stakeholders.
    Nicholls SG; Carroll K; Zwarenstein M; Brehaut JC; Weijer C; Hey SP; Goldstein CE; Graham ID; Grimshaw JM; McKenzie JE; Fergusson DA; Taljaard M;
    Trials; 2019 Dec; 20(1):765. PubMed ID: 31870433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Stakeholders' views on the ethical challenges of pragmatic trials investigating pharmaceutical drugs.
    Kalkman S; van Thiel GJ; Grobbee DE; Meinecke AK; Zuidgeest MG; van Delden JJ;
    Trials; 2016 Aug; 17(1):419. PubMed ID: 27550379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A pragmatic-explanatory continuum indicator summary (PRECIS): a tool to help trial designers.
    Thorpe KE; Zwarenstein M; Oxman AD; Treweek S; Furberg CD; Altman DG; Tunis S; Bergel E; Harvey I; Magid DJ; Chalkidou K
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 May; 62(5):464-75. PubMed ID: 19348971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The ethical justification for inclusion of neonates in pragmatic randomized clinical trials for emergency newborn care.
    Kaye DK
    BMC Pediatr; 2019 Jul; 19(1):218. PubMed ID: 31266486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Stepped-wedge trials should be classified as research for the purpose of ethical review.
    Hemming K; Taljaard M; Marshall T; Goldstein CE; Weijer C
    Clin Trials; 2019 Dec; 16(6):580-588. PubMed ID: 31818147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Real-world evidence: How pragmatic are randomized controlled trials labeled as pragmatic?
    Dal-Ré R; Janiaud P; Ioannidis JPA
    BMC Med; 2018 Apr; 16(1):49. PubMed ID: 29615035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An Argument for Fewer Clinical Trials.
    Borgerson K
    Hastings Cent Rep; 2016 Nov; 46(6):25-35. PubMed ID: 27711966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cluster over individual randomization: are study design choices appropriately justified? Review of a random sample of trials.
    Taljaard M; Goldstein CE; Giraudeau B; Nicholls SG; Carroll K; Hey SP; Brehaut JC; Jairath V; London AJ; Eldridge SM; Grimshaw JM; Fergusson DA; Weijer C
    Clin Trials; 2020 Jun; 17(3):253-263. PubMed ID: 32367741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Ethics and practice of Trials within Cohorts: An emerging pragmatic trial design.
    Kim SY; Flory J; Relton C
    Clin Trials; 2018 Feb; 15(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 29224380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Social Value of Pragmatic Trials.
    Kalkman S; van Thiel G; van der Graaf R; Zuidgeest M; Goetz I; Grobbee D; van Delden J
    Bioethics; 2017 Feb; 31(2):136-143. PubMed ID: 28060433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ethical Issues in Pragmatic Cluster-Randomized Trials in Dialysis Facilities.
    Goldstein CE; Weijer C; Taljaard M; Al-Jaishi AA; Basile E; Brehaut J; Cook CL; Grimshaw JM; Lacson E; Lindsay C; Jardine M; Dember LM; Garg AX
    Am J Kidney Dis; 2019 Nov; 74(5):659-666. PubMed ID: 31227227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ethical complexities in standard of care randomized trials: A case study of morning versus nighttime dosing of blood pressure drugs.
    Kim SY; Miller FG
    Clin Trials; 2015 Dec; 12(6):557-63. PubMed ID: 26400874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ethical pitfalls in neonatal comparative effectiveness trials.
    Modi N
    Neonatology; 2014; 105(4):350-1. PubMed ID: 24931328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A pragmatic view on pragmatic trials.
    Patsopoulos NA
    Dialogues Clin Neurosci; 2011; 13(2):217-24. PubMed ID: 21842619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Ethical Considerations in Conducting Pragmatic Trials in Oncology.
    Hammer MJ
    Oncol Nurs Forum; 2017 Sep; 44(5):537-539. PubMed ID: 28820523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The importance of decision intent within descriptions of pragmatic trials.
    Nicholls SG; Zwarenstein M; Hey SP; Giraudeau B; Campbell MK; Taljaard M
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 Sep; 125():30-37. PubMed ID: 32422248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.