These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2381312)

  • 1. Disambiguation by community membership.
    Gerrig RJ; Littman ML
    Mem Cognit; 1990 Jul; 18(4):331-8. PubMed ID: 2381312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Knowledge and implicature: modeling language understanding as social cognition.
    Goodman ND; Stuhlmüller A
    Top Cogn Sci; 2013 Jan; 5(1):173-84. PubMed ID: 23335578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Learning about others: Modeling social inference through ambiguity resolution.
    Achimova A; Scontras G; Stegemann-Philipps C; Lohmann J; Butz MV
    Cognition; 2022 Jan; 218():104862. PubMed ID: 34634532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cognitive representation of conversations about persons.
    Wyer RS; Budesheim TL; Lambert AJ
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1990 Feb; 58(2):218-38. PubMed ID: 2319442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of Disfluency in Online Interpretation of Deception.
    Loy JE; Rohde H; Corley M
    Cogn Sci; 2017 May; 41 Suppl 6():1434-1456. PubMed ID: 27246116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Perceptual Discrimination of Speaking Style Under Cochlear Implant Simulation.
    Tamati TN; Janse E; Başkent D
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(1):63-76. PubMed ID: 29742545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. When can listeners detect disfluency in spontaneous speech?
    Lickley RJ; Bard EG
    Lang Speech; 1998; 41 ( Pt 2)():203-26. PubMed ID: 10194877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Interactions between distal speech rate, linguistic knowledge, and speech environment.
    Morrill T; Baese-Berk M; Heffner C; Dilley L
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Oct; 22(5):1451-7. PubMed ID: 25794478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Inferring word meanings by assuming that speakers are informative.
    Frank MC; Goodman ND
    Cogn Psychol; 2014 Dec; 75():80-96. PubMed ID: 25238461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Listeners' comprehension of uptalk in spontaneous speech.
    Tomlinson JM; Fox Tree JE
    Cognition; 2011 Apr; 119(1):58-69. PubMed ID: 21237451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Adjusting conceptual pacts in three-party conversation.
    Yoon SO; Brown-Schmidt S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Jul; 40(4):919-37. PubMed ID: 24707779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Don't Underestimate the Benefits of Being Misunderstood.
    Gibson E; Tan C; Futrell R; Mahowald K; Konieczny L; Hemforth B; Fedorenko E
    Psychol Sci; 2017 Jun; 28(6):703-712. PubMed ID: 28394708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Children's understanding of private keys in referential communication.
    Ackerman BP; Silver D
    J Exp Child Psychol; 1990 Oct; 50(2):217-42. PubMed ID: 2258689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Understanding referential expressions in context: use of common ground by children and adolescents with mental retardation.
    Abbeduto L; Short-Meyerson K; Benson G; Dolish J; Weissman M
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 1998 Dec; 41(6):1348-62. PubMed ID: 9859890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Speaker-specific processing of anomalous utterances.
    Brehm L; Jackson CN; Miller KL
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Apr; 72(4):764-778. PubMed ID: 29504462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. When do speakers take into account common ground?
    Horton WS; Keysar B
    Cognition; 1996 Apr; 59(1):91-117. PubMed ID: 8857472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Social identity and socially shared retrieval-induced forgetting: The effects of group membership.
    Coman A; Hirst W
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2015 Aug; 144(4):717-722. PubMed ID: 25938179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Do people use language production to make predictions during comprehension?
    Pickering MJ; Garrod S
    Trends Cogn Sci; 2007 Mar; 11(3):105-10. PubMed ID: 17254833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. NEW DEVELOPMENTS IN FACET DESIGN AND ANALYSIS.
    FOA UG
    Psychol Rev; 1965 Jul; 72():262-74. PubMed ID: 14348424
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Resolving uncertainty in plural predication.
    Scontras G; Goodman ND
    Cognition; 2017 Nov; 168():294-311. PubMed ID: 28756352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.