228 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23813156)
21. Revision total hip arthroplasty in patients with extensive proximal femoral bone loss using a fluted tapered modular femoral component.
Amanatullah DF; Howard JL; Siman H; Trousdale RT; Mabry TM; Berry DJ
Bone Joint J; 2015 Mar; 97-B(3):312-7. PubMed ID: 25737513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Long-term results of femoral revision with the Wagner Self-Locking stem.
Regis D; Sandri A; Bonetti I
Surg Technol Int; 2013 Sep; 23():243-50. PubMed ID: 24081844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Revision total hip arthroplasty after removal of a fractured well-fixed extensively porous-coated femoral component using a trephine.
Amanatullah DF; Siman H; Pallante GD; Haber DB; Sierra RJ; Trousdale RT
Bone Joint J; 2015 Sep; 97-B(9):1192-6. PubMed ID: 26330584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The 21- to 27-year results of the Harris-Galante cementless total hip arthroplasty.
Kawamura H; Mishima H; Sugaya H; Nishino T; Shimizu Y; Miyakawa S
J Orthop Sci; 2016 May; 21(3):342-7. PubMed ID: 26970833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Mid-Term Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of a Long Cementless Monobloc Stem for Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty.
Chatelet JC; Ait-Si-Selmi T; Machenaud A; Ramos-Pascual S; ; Fessy MH
J Arthroplasty; 2021 Jan; 36(1):261-267. PubMed ID: 32819781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The bone-vacuum cementing technique for the fixation of the stem in total hip arthroplasty.
Pitto RP; Kessler M; Schikora N; di Muria GV
Chir Organi Mov; 2001; 86(2):99-110. PubMed ID: 12025052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Revision hip arthroplasty with a modular cementless stem: mid-term follow up.
Jibodh SR; Schwarzkopf R; Anthony SG; Malchau H; Dempsey KE; Estok DM
J Arthroplasty; 2013 Aug; 28(7):1167-72. PubMed ID: 23114191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The outcome of rerevision of an extensively porous-coated stem with another extensively porous-coated stem.
Hamilton WG; McAuley JP; Tabaraee E; Engh CA
J Arthroplasty; 2008 Feb; 23(2):170-4. PubMed ID: 18280408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. THA revision with extensively porous-coated stems. 32 hips followed 2-6.5 years.
Sugimura T; Tohkura A
Acta Orthop Scand; 1998 Feb; 69(1):11-3. PubMed ID: 9524508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [Personal experience with the Wagner revision stem in hip joint reoperations].
Cech O; Stehlík J; Krbec M; Vrecion V
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2001; 68(3):148-61. PubMed ID: 11706537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Extensively coated femoral components in revision hip arthroplasty: follow-up study of 23 patients.
Ng FY; Chiu KY; Yau WP; Ng TP; Tang WM
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong); 2004 Dec; 12(2):168-72. PubMed ID: 15621901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Not all cementless femoral stems are created equal but the results may be comparable.
Carlson SW; Liu SS; Callaghan JJ
Bone Joint J; 2017 Jan; 99-B(1 Supple A):14-17. PubMed ID: 28042113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Revision hip arthroplasty using strut allografts and fully porous-coated stems.
Kim YH; Kim JS
J Arthroplasty; 2005 Jun; 20(4):454-9. PubMed ID: 16124960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Total hip arthroplasty with a cemented, polished, collared femoral stem and a cementless acetabular component. A follow-up study at a minimum of ten years.
Firestone DE; Callaghan JJ; Liu SS; Goetz DD; Sullivan PM; Vittetoe DA; Johnston RC
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2007 Jan; 89(1):126-32. PubMed ID: 17200319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The S-ROM hydroxyapatite proximally-coated modular femoral stem in revision hip replacement: results of 397 hips at a minimum ten-year follow-up.
Imbuldeniya AM; Walter WK; Zicat BA; Walter WL
Bone Joint J; 2014 Jun; 96-B(6):730-6. PubMed ID: 24891571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Clinical and radiographic analysis of the Mallory-Head femoral component in revision total hip arthroplasty. A minimum 8.8-year and average eleven-year follow-up study.
Emerson RH; Head WC; Higgins LL
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2003 Oct; 85(10):1921-6. PubMed ID: 14563799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Extensively porous-coated stems for femoral revision: reliable choice for stem revision in Paprosky femoral type III defects.
Chung LH; Wu PK; Chen CF; Chen WM; Chen TH; Liu CL
Orthopedics; 2012 Jul; 35(7):e1017-21. PubMed ID: 22784893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. High rate of fracture in the cementless modular Extrême™ (Mark I) femoral prosthesis in revision total hip arthroplasty: 33 cases at more than 5 years' follow-up.
Benoist J; Lambotte JC; Polard JL; Huten D
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2013 Dec; 99(8):915-21. PubMed ID: 24211127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Minimum 10-year-results of extensively porous-coated stems in revision hip arthroplasty.
Paprosky WG; Greidanus NV; Antoniou J
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1999 Dec; (369):230-42. PubMed ID: 10611878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Cementless total hip arthroplasty in patients fifty years of age or younger: a minimum ten-year follow-up.
Takenaga RK; Callaghan JJ; Bedard NA; Liu SS; Klaassen AL; Pedersen DR
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2012 Dec; 94(23):2153-9. PubMed ID: 23224386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
