These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23813748)

  • 1. Investigators' successful strategies for working with Institutional Review Boards.
    Cartwright JC; Hickman SE; Nelson CA; Knafl KA
    Res Nurs Health; 2013 Oct; 36(5):478-86. PubMed ID: 23813748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Operational Characteristics of Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) in the United States.
    Nesom GL; Petrof I; Moore TM
    AJOB Empir Bioeth; 2019; 10(4):276-286. PubMed ID: 31618119
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The IRB paradox: could the protectors also encourage deceit?
    Keith-Spiegel P; Koocher GP
    Ethics Behav; 2005; 15(4):339-49. PubMed ID: 16578924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Should society allow research ethics boards to be run as for-profit enterprises?
    Emanuel EJ; Lemmens T; Elliot C
    PLoS Med; 2006 Jul; 3(7):e309. PubMed ID: 16848618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement: oversight of clinical research.
    American Society of Clinical Oncology
    J Clin Oncol; 2003 Jun; 21(12):2377-86. PubMed ID: 12721281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Impact of Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) on Clinical Innovation: A Survey of Investigators and IRB Members.
    Stryjewski TP; Kalish BT; Silverman B; Lehmann LS
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2015 Dec; 10(5):481-7. PubMed ID: 26564945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Perspectives of Singaporean biomedical researchers and research support staff on actual and ideal IRB review functions and characteristics: A quantitative analysis.
    Labude MK; Shen L; Zhu Y; Schaefer GO; Ong C; Xafis V
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(12):e0241783. PubMed ID: 33382683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. "Members of the same club": challenges and decisions faced by US IRBs in identifying and managing conflicts of interest.
    Klitzman R
    PLoS One; 2011; 6(7):e22796. PubMed ID: 21829516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The challenges of IRB review and human subjects protections in practice-based research.
    Wolf LE; Croughan M; Lo B
    Med Care; 2002 Jun; 40(6):521-9. PubMed ID: 12021678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Costs and inconsistencies in US IRB review of low-risk medical education research.
    Kano M; Getrich CM; Romney C; Sussman AL; Williams RL
    Med Educ; 2015 Jun; 49(6):634-7. PubMed ID: 25989411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Working with human research protections.
    Arford PH
    J Nurs Scholarsh; 2004; 36(3):265-71. PubMed ID: 15495497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Compassion and vigilance: investigators' strategies to manage ethical concerns in palliative and end-of-life research.
    Hickman SE; Cartwright JC; Nelson CA; Knafl K
    J Palliat Med; 2012 Aug; 15(8):880-9. PubMed ID: 22731516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of local institutional review board review on participation in national practice-based research network studies.
    Finch SA; Barkin SL; Wasserman RC; Dhepyasuwan N; Slora EJ; Sege RD
    Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med; 2009 Dec; 163(12):1130-4. PubMed ID: 19996050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Understanding institutional review boards: practical guidance to the IRB review process.
    Pech C; Cob N; Cejka JT
    Nutr Clin Pract; 2007 Dec; 22(6):618-28. PubMed ID: 18042949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Analysis of the Nature of IRB Contingencies Required for Informed Consent Document Approval.
    Blackwood RA; Maio RF; Mrdjenovich AJ; VandenBosch TM; Gordon PS; Shipman EL; Hamilton TA
    Account Res; 2015; 22(4):237-45. PubMed ID: 25897768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ethical conduct of palliative care research: enhancing communication between investigators and institutional review boards.
    Abernethy AP; Capell WH; Aziz NM; Ritchie C; Prince-Paul M; Bennett RE; Kutner JS
    J Pain Symptom Manage; 2014 Dec; 48(6):1211-21. PubMed ID: 24879998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Awareness of Jordanian Investigators About the Importance of Ethics Review Committees: A Pilot Study.
    Rababa'h AM; Alzoubi KH; Ababneh M; Khabour OF
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2020 Apr; 26(2):821-831. PubMed ID: 31571048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Ten questions institutional review boards should ask when reviewing international clinical research protocols.
    Fitzgerald DW; Wasunna A; Pape JW
    IRB; 2003; 25(2):14-8. PubMed ID: 12833903
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. "Protecting" or "Policing": Academic Researchers' View of IRBs in an Arab Context.
    Makhoul J; El-Alti L; Qutteina Y; Nasrallah C; Sakr C; Nakkash R; Alali K
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2014 Dec; 9(5):25-35. PubMed ID: 25747688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The purpose, composition, and function of an institutional review board: balancing priorities.
    Enfield KB; Truwit JD
    Respir Care; 2008 Oct; 53(10):1330-6. PubMed ID: 18811996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.