179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23813748)
1. Investigators' successful strategies for working with Institutional Review Boards.
Cartwright JC; Hickman SE; Nelson CA; Knafl KA
Res Nurs Health; 2013 Oct; 36(5):478-86. PubMed ID: 23813748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Operational Characteristics of Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) in the United States.
Nesom GL; Petrof I; Moore TM
AJOB Empir Bioeth; 2019; 10(4):276-286. PubMed ID: 31618119
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The IRB paradox: could the protectors also encourage deceit?
Keith-Spiegel P; Koocher GP
Ethics Behav; 2005; 15(4):339-49. PubMed ID: 16578924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Should society allow research ethics boards to be run as for-profit enterprises?
Emanuel EJ; Lemmens T; Elliot C
PLoS Med; 2006 Jul; 3(7):e309. PubMed ID: 16848618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement: oversight of clinical research.
American Society of Clinical Oncology
J Clin Oncol; 2003 Jun; 21(12):2377-86. PubMed ID: 12721281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Impact of Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) on Clinical Innovation: A Survey of Investigators and IRB Members.
Stryjewski TP; Kalish BT; Silverman B; Lehmann LS
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2015 Dec; 10(5):481-7. PubMed ID: 26564945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Perspectives of Singaporean biomedical researchers and research support staff on actual and ideal IRB review functions and characteristics: A quantitative analysis.
Labude MK; Shen L; Zhu Y; Schaefer GO; Ong C; Xafis V
PLoS One; 2020; 15(12):e0241783. PubMed ID: 33382683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. "Members of the same club": challenges and decisions faced by US IRBs in identifying and managing conflicts of interest.
Klitzman R
PLoS One; 2011; 6(7):e22796. PubMed ID: 21829516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The challenges of IRB review and human subjects protections in practice-based research.
Wolf LE; Croughan M; Lo B
Med Care; 2002 Jun; 40(6):521-9. PubMed ID: 12021678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Costs and inconsistencies in US IRB review of low-risk medical education research.
Kano M; Getrich CM; Romney C; Sussman AL; Williams RL
Med Educ; 2015 Jun; 49(6):634-7. PubMed ID: 25989411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Working with human research protections.
Arford PH
J Nurs Scholarsh; 2004; 36(3):265-71. PubMed ID: 15495497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Compassion and vigilance: investigators' strategies to manage ethical concerns in palliative and end-of-life research.
Hickman SE; Cartwright JC; Nelson CA; Knafl K
J Palliat Med; 2012 Aug; 15(8):880-9. PubMed ID: 22731516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of local institutional review board review on participation in national practice-based research network studies.
Finch SA; Barkin SL; Wasserman RC; Dhepyasuwan N; Slora EJ; Sege RD
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med; 2009 Dec; 163(12):1130-4. PubMed ID: 19996050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Understanding institutional review boards: practical guidance to the IRB review process.
Pech C; Cob N; Cejka JT
Nutr Clin Pract; 2007 Dec; 22(6):618-28. PubMed ID: 18042949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Analysis of the Nature of IRB Contingencies Required for Informed Consent Document Approval.
Blackwood RA; Maio RF; Mrdjenovich AJ; VandenBosch TM; Gordon PS; Shipman EL; Hamilton TA
Account Res; 2015; 22(4):237-45. PubMed ID: 25897768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Ethical conduct of palliative care research: enhancing communication between investigators and institutional review boards.
Abernethy AP; Capell WH; Aziz NM; Ritchie C; Prince-Paul M; Bennett RE; Kutner JS
J Pain Symptom Manage; 2014 Dec; 48(6):1211-21. PubMed ID: 24879998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Awareness of Jordanian Investigators About the Importance of Ethics Review Committees: A Pilot Study.
Rababa'h AM; Alzoubi KH; Ababneh M; Khabour OF
Sci Eng Ethics; 2020 Apr; 26(2):821-831. PubMed ID: 31571048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Ten questions institutional review boards should ask when reviewing international clinical research protocols.
Fitzgerald DW; Wasunna A; Pape JW
IRB; 2003; 25(2):14-8. PubMed ID: 12833903
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. "Protecting" or "Policing": Academic Researchers' View of IRBs in an Arab Context.
Makhoul J; El-Alti L; Qutteina Y; Nasrallah C; Sakr C; Nakkash R; Alali K
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2014 Dec; 9(5):25-35. PubMed ID: 25747688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The purpose, composition, and function of an institutional review board: balancing priorities.
Enfield KB; Truwit JD
Respir Care; 2008 Oct; 53(10):1330-6. PubMed ID: 18811996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
