These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23814280)
21. Avian predators attack aposematic prey more forcefully when they are part of an aggregation. Skelhorn J; Ruxton GD Biol Lett; 2006 Dec; 2(4):488-90. PubMed ID: 17148269 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Aposematic signals and the relationship between conspicuousness and distinctiveness. Merilaita S; Ruxton GD J Theor Biol; 2007 Mar; 245(2):268-77. PubMed ID: 17157321 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Evidence for a peak-shift in predator generalization among aposematic prey. Gamberale G; Tullberg BS Proc Biol Sci; 1996 Oct; 263(1375):1329-34. PubMed ID: 8914330 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. How can automimicry persist when predators can preferentially consume undefended mimics? Ruxton GD; Speed MP Proc Biol Sci; 2006 Feb; 273(1584):373-8. PubMed ID: 16543181 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Warning signals confer advantage to prey in competition with predators: bumblebees steal nests from insectivorous birds. Jablonski PG; Cho HJ; Song SR; Kang CK; Lee SI Behav Ecol Sociobiol; 2013 Aug; 67(8):1259-1267. PubMed ID: 23853395 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Predator mixes and the conspicuousness of aposematic signals. Endler JA; Mappes J Am Nat; 2004 Apr; 163(4):532-47. PubMed ID: 15122501 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Perspective: the evolution of warning coloration is not paradoxical. Marples NM; Kelly DJ; Thomas RJ Evolution; 2005 May; 59(5):933-40. PubMed ID: 16136793 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A matter of proportion? Associational effects in larval anuran communities under fish predation. Kaczmarek JM; Kaczmarski M; Mazurkiewicz J; Kloskowski J Oecologia; 2018 Jul; 187(3):745-753. PubMed ID: 29713808 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The signal detection problem of aposematic prey revisited: integrating prior social and personal experience. Hämäläinen L; Thorogood R Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2020 Jul; 375(1802):20190473. PubMed ID: 32420858 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Reciprocity in predator-prey interactions: exposure to defended prey and predation risk affects intermediate predator life history and morphology. Hammill E; Beckerman AP Oecologia; 2010 May; 163(1):193-202. PubMed ID: 19936795 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Hard to catch: experimental evidence supports evasive mimicry. Páez E; Valkonen JK; Willmott KR; Matos-Maraví P; Elias M; Mappes J Proc Biol Sci; 2021 Mar; 288(1946):20203052. PubMed ID: 33715434 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The memory of hunger: developmental plasticity of dietary selectivity in the European starling, Bloxham L; Bateson M; Bedford T; Brilot B; Nettle D Anim Behav; 2014 May; 91(100):33-40. PubMed ID: 24910465 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Distance-dependent aposematism and camouflage in the cinnabar moth caterpillar ( Barnett JB; Cuthill IC; Scott-Samuel NE R Soc Open Sci; 2018 Feb; 5(2):171396. PubMed ID: 29515858 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Reciprocal mimicry: kin selection can drive defended prey to resemble their Batesian mimics. Holen ØH; Johnstone RA Proc Biol Sci; 2018 Oct; 285(1890):. PubMed ID: 30381376 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]