These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23814280)

  • 41. Decision time and prey gregariousness influence attack probability in naïve and experienced predators.
    Gamberale-Stille G
    Anim Behav; 2000 Jul; 60(1):95-99. PubMed ID: 10924208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Birds learn to avoid aposematic prey by using the appearance of host plants.
    McLellan CF; Scott-Samuel NE; Cuthill IC
    Curr Biol; 2021 Dec; 31(23):5364-5369.e4. PubMed ID: 34624210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Aposematism: balancing salience and camouflage.
    Barnett JB; Scott-Samuel NE; Cuthill IC
    Biol Lett; 2016 Aug; 12(8):. PubMed ID: 27484645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Evolutionary implications of the form of predator generalization for aposematic signals and mimicry in prey.
    Ruxton GD; Franks DW; Balogh AC; Leimar O
    Evolution; 2008 Nov; 62(11):2913-21. PubMed ID: 18752602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Frequency-dependent taste-rejection by avian predation may select for defence chemical polymorphisms in aposematic prey.
    Skelhorn J; Rowe C
    Biol Lett; 2005 Dec; 1(4):500-3. PubMed ID: 17148243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. The effect of alternative prey on the dynamics of imperfect Batesian and Müllerian mimicries.
    Lindström L; Alatalo RV; Lyytinen A; Mappes J
    Evolution; 2004 Jun; 58(6):1294-302. PubMed ID: 15266978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Co-mimics have a mutualistic relationship despite unequal defences.
    Rowland HM; Ihalainen E; Lindström L; Mappes J; Speed MP
    Nature; 2007 Jul; 448(7149):64-7. PubMed ID: 17611539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Variation in predator species abundance can cause variable selection pressure on warning signaling prey.
    Valkonen JK; Nokelainen O; Niskanen M; Kilpimaa J; Björklund M; Mappes J
    Ecol Evol; 2012 Aug; 2(8):1971-6. PubMed ID: 22957197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Is the hibiscus harlequin bug aposematic? The importance of testing multiple predators.
    Fabricant SA; Smith CL
    Ecol Evol; 2014 Jan; 4(2):113-20. PubMed ID: 24558567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Evolution of switchable aposematism: insights from individual-based simulations.
    Song W; Lee SI; Jablonski PG
    PeerJ; 2020; 8():e8915. PubMed ID: 32309047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. The effects of predator learning, forgetting, and recognition errors on the evolution of warning coloration.
    Servedio MR
    Evolution; 2000 Jun; 54(3):751-63. PubMed ID: 10937250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Differential detectability of polymorphic warning signals under varying light environments.
    Rojas B; Rautiala P; Mappes J
    Behav Processes; 2014 Nov; 109 Pt B():164-72. PubMed ID: 25158931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Predator selection on multicomponent warning signals in an aposematic moth.
    Hämäläinen L; Binns GE; Hart NS; Mappes J; McDonald PG; O'Neill LG; Rowland HM; Umbers KDL; Herberstein ME
    Behav Ecol; 2024; 35(1):arad097. PubMed ID: 38550303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Both Palatable and Unpalatable Butterflies Use Bright Colors to Signal Difficulty of Capture to Predators.
    Pinheiro CE; Freitas AV; Campos VC; DeVries PJ; Penz CM
    Neotrop Entomol; 2016 Apr; 45(2):107-13. PubMed ID: 26911159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Cryptic differences in colour among Müllerian mimics: how can the visual capacities of predators and prey shape the evolution of wing colours?
    Llaurens V; Joron M; Théry M
    J Evol Biol; 2014 Mar; 27(3):531-40. PubMed ID: 24444083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Searching in patches by European starlings, Sturnus vulgaris.
    Dall SR; Cuthill IC
    Behav Processes; 1997 Feb; 39(2):149-59. PubMed ID: 24896962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Predation pressure on an imperfect Batesian micicry complex in the presence of alternative prey.
    Hetz M; Slobodchikoff CN
    Oecologia; 1988 Sep; 76(4):570-573. PubMed ID: 28312410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Geographic mosaic of selection by avian predators on hindwing warning colour in a polymorphic aposematic moth.
    Rönkä K; Valkonen JK; Nokelainen O; Rojas B; Gordon S; Burdfield-Steel E; Mappes J
    Ecol Lett; 2020 Nov; 23(11):1654-1663. PubMed ID: 32881319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Costs of Learning and the Evolution of Mimetic Signals.
    Kikuchi DW; Sherratt TN
    Am Nat; 2015 Sep; 186(3):321-32. PubMed ID: 26655351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Inferring predator behavior from attack rates on prey-replicas that differ in conspicuousness.
    Stuart YE; Dappen N; Losin N
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(10):e48497. PubMed ID: 23119039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.