211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23814563)
1. Analysis of linear measurement accuracy obtained by cone beam computed tomography (CBCT-NewTom VG).
Moshfeghi M; Tavakoli MA; Hosseini ET; Hosseini AT; Hosseini IT
Dent Res J (Isfahan); 2012 Dec; 9(Suppl 1):S57-62. PubMed ID: 23814563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Analysis of the accuracy of linear measurements obtained by cone beam computed tomography (CBCT-NewTom).
Lascala CA; Panella J; Marques MM
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Sep; 33(5):291-4. PubMed ID: 15585804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accuracy Assessment of Three-dimensional Surface Reconstructions of In vivo Teeth from Cone-beam Computed Tomography.
Sang YH; Hu HC; Lu SH; Wu YW; Li WR; Tang ZH
Chin Med J (Engl); 2016 Jun; 129(12):1464-70. PubMed ID: 27270544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reliability and accuracy of cone beam computed tomography versus conventional multidetector computed tomography for image-guided craniofacial implant planning: An in vitro study.
Dings JP; Verhamme L; Merkx MA; Xi T; Meijer GJ; Maal TJ
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(3):665–672. PubMed ID: 30934042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reliability of Orthopantomography and Cone-beam Computed Tomography in Presurgical Implant Planning: A Clinical Study.
Sahota J; Bhatia A; Gupta M; Singh V; Soni J; Soni R
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2017 Aug; 18(8):665-669. PubMed ID: 28816186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accuracy of linear measurements using cone beam computed tomography and panoramic radiography in dental implant treatment planning.
Luangchana P; Pornprasertsuk-Damrongsri S; Kiattavorncharoen S; Jirajariyavej B
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2015; 30(6):1287-94. PubMed ID: 26574854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reliability and accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography voxel density and linear distance measurement at different voxel sizes: A study on sheep head cadaver.
Güngör E; Doğan MS
J Dent Sci; 2017 Jun; 12(2):145-150. PubMed ID: 30895040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Factors affecting the accuracy of buccal alveolar bone height measurements from cone-beam computed tomography images.
Wood R; Sun Z; Chaudhry J; Tee BC; Kim DG; Leblebicioglu B; England G
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Mar; 143(3):353-63. PubMed ID: 23452969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accuracy and reliability of different cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) devices for structural analysis of alveolar bone in comparison with multislice CT and micro-CT.
Van Dessel J; Nicolielo LF; Huang Y; Coudyzer W; Salmon B; Lambrichts I; Jacobs R
Eur J Oral Implantol; 2017; 10(1):95-105. PubMed ID: 28327698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Quantification of bone quality using different cone beam computed tomography devices: Accuracy assessment for edentulous human mandibles.
Van Dessel J; Nicolielo LF; Huang Y; Slagmolen P; Politis C; Lambrichts I; Jacobs R
Eur J Oral Implantol; 2016; 9(4):411-424. PubMed ID: 27990508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The reliability of cephalometric measurements in oral and maxillofacial imaging: Cone beam computed tomography versus two-dimensional digital cephalograms.
Hariharan A; Diwakar NR; Jayanthi K; Hema HM; Deepukrishna S; Ghaste SR
Indian J Dent Res; 2016; 27(4):370-377. PubMed ID: 27723632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy of linear measurements from imaging plate and lateral cephalometric images derived from cone-beam computed tomography.
Moshiri M; Scarfe WC; Hilgers ML; Scheetz JP; Silveira AM; Farman AG
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Oct; 132(4):550-60. PubMed ID: 17920510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison between 3D volumetric rendering and multiplanar slices on the reliability of linear measurements on CBCT images: an in vitro study.
Fernandes TM; Adamczyk J; Poleti ML; Henriques JF; Friedland B; Garib DG
J Appl Oral Sci; 2015; 23(1):56-63. PubMed ID: 25004053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Beam Hardening Artifacts: Comparison between Two Cone Beam Computed Tomography Scanners.
Esmaeili F; Johari M; Haddadi P; Vatankhah M
J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects; 2012; 6(2):49-53. PubMed ID: 22991636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparative study of the accuracy of CBCT implant site measurements using different software programs.
Al-Ekrish AA
Saudi Dent J; 2021 Sep; 33(6):355-361. PubMed ID: 34434039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Accuracy of linear measurements from cone-beam computed tomography-derived surface models of different voxel sizes.
Damstra J; Fourie Z; Huddleston Slater JJ; Ren Y
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Jan; 137(1):16.e1-6; discussion 16-7. PubMed ID: 20122425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparative study of the accuracy and reliability of multidetector computed tomography and cone beam computed tomography in the assessment of dental implant site dimensions.
Al-Ekrish AA; Ekram M
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2011 Feb; 40(2):67-75. PubMed ID: 21239568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accuracy of linear measurements on CBCT images related to presurgical implant treatment planning: A systematic review.
Fokas G; Vaughn VM; Scarfe WC; Bornstein MM
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Oct; 29 Suppl 16():393-415. PubMed ID: 30328204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Accuracy of linear measurements and visibility of the mandibular canal of cone-beam computed tomography images with different voxel sizes: an in vitro study.
Waltrick KB; Nunes de Abreu Junior MJ; Corrêa M; Zastrow MD; Dutra VD
J Periodontol; 2013 Jan; 84(1):68-77. PubMed ID: 22390549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of a tridimensional cephalometric analysis performed on 3T-MRI compared with CBCT: a pilot study in adults.
Maspero C; Abate A; Bellincioni F; Cavagnetto D; Lanteri V; Costa A; Farronato M
Prog Orthod; 2019 Oct; 20(1):40. PubMed ID: 31631241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
