211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23814563)
21. Linear accuracy and reliability of cone beam CT derived 3-dimensional images constructed using an orthodontic volumetric rendering program.
Periago DR; Scarfe WC; Moshiri M; Scheetz JP; Silveira AM; Farman AG
Angle Orthod; 2008 May; 78(3):387-95. PubMed ID: 18416632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Linear Measurement Accuracy of Eight Cone Beam Computed Tomography Scanners.
Kosalagood P; Silkosessak OC; Pittayapat P; Pisarnturakit P; Pauwels R; Jacobs R
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Dec; 17(6):1217-27. PubMed ID: 24673845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Effect of bone thickness on alveolar bone-height measurements from cone-beam computed tomography images.
Sun Z; Smith T; Kortam S; Kim DG; Tee BC; Fields H
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Feb; 139(2):e117-27. PubMed ID: 21300222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Diagnostic accuracy of cone beam computed tomography for dimensional linear measurements in the mandible.
Halperin-Sternfeld M; Machtei EE; Horwitz J
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(3):593-9. PubMed ID: 24818197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Evaluation of the accuracy of linear measurements on lateral cephalograms obtained from cone-beam computed tomography scans with digital lateral cephalometric radiography: an in vitro study.
Shokri A; Khajeh S; Khavid A
J Craniofac Surg; 2014 Sep; 25(5):1710-3. PubMed ID: 25203572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Effect of Mandibular Angulation on Pre-Implant Site Measurement Accuracy Using CBCT.
Önem E; Baksı BG; Turhal RI; Şen BH
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2021; 36(5):937–943. PubMed ID: 34157066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Accuracy of CBCT measurements of a human skull.
Kamburoğlu K; Kolsuz E; Kurt H; Kiliç C; Özen T; Paksoy CS
J Digit Imaging; 2011 Oct; 24(5):787-93. PubMed ID: 20857166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Accuracy and reliability of stitched cone-beam computed tomography images.
Egbert N; Cagna DR; Ahuja S; Wicks RA
Imaging Sci Dent; 2015 Mar; 45(1):41-7. PubMed ID: 25793182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Accuracy of linear measurements obtained from stitched cone beam computed tomography images versus direct skull measurements.
Hamed DAF; El Dawlatly MM; El Dessouky SH; Hamdy RM
F1000Res; 2019; 8():166. PubMed ID: 32399179
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Linear accuracy of cone beam CT derived 3D images.
Brown AA; Scarfe WC; Scheetz JP; Silveira AM; Farman AG
Angle Orthod; 2009 Jan; 79(1):150-7. PubMed ID: 19123719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Impact of Using Standard and High-Resolution Exposure Modalities of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) System for Dental Implants Dimension Measurements.
Mehdizadeh M; Rostamzadeh P; Taheri H
Adv Biomed Res; 2023; 12():225. PubMed ID: 38073746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Jawbone measurements of edentulous sites related to implant planning using magnetic resonance imaging compared to cone beam computed tomography: An ex vivo study.
Fuglsig JMCES; Schropp L; Hansen B; Wenzel A; Spin-Neto R
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2024 Feb; 35(2):179-186. PubMed ID: 37985190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The usefulness of cone-beam computed tomography gray values for alveolar bone linear measurements.
Padala S; Tee BC; Beck FM; Elias K; Kim DG; Sun Z
Angle Orthod; 2018 Mar; 88(2):227-232. PubMed ID: 29337632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Measurements of mandibular canal region obtained by cone-beam computed tomography: a cadaveric study.
Kamburoğlu K; Kiliç C; Ozen T; Yüksel SP
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Feb; 107(2):e34-42. PubMed ID: 19138636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Mesiodistal Measurements for Dental Implant Planning: A Prospective Clinical Study of Linear Measurements on Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Images in Comparison with Caliper-Based Measurements on Plaster Casts.
Vazquez L; Buser R; Carrel JP
Dent J (Basel); 2022 Sep; 10(9):. PubMed ID: 36135164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility in linear measurements on axial images obtained by cone-beam computed tomography.
da Silva NC; Barriviera M; Junqueira JL; Panzarella FK; Raitz R
Imaging Sci Dent; 2017 Mar; 47(1):11-15. PubMed ID: 28361024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Linear measurement accuracy of CBCT panoramic reconstructions: experimental study with dry human mandibles.
Almeida VSM; Bomfim RT; Sobreira ACR; Barbosa IDS; Leite-Ribeiro PM; Rubira-Bullen IR; Sarmento VA
Oral Radiol; 2021 Jul; 37(3):421-426. PubMed ID: 32936399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The influence of cone-beam computed tomography and periapical radiographic evaluation on the assessment of periapical bone destruction in dog's teeth.
Ordinola-Zapata R; Bramante CM; Duarte MH; Ramos Fernandes LM; Camargo EJ; de Moraes IG; Bernardineli N; Vivan RR; Capelozza AL; Garcia RB
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Aug; 112(2):272-9. PubMed ID: 21530334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Beam hardening artifacts by dental implants: Comparison of cone-beam and 64-slice computed tomography scanners.
Esmaeili F; Johari M; Haddadi P
Dent Res J (Isfahan); 2013 May; 10(3):376-81. PubMed ID: 24019808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Influence of Head Orientation in Linear Measurement for Implant Planning in Cone Beam Computed Tomography.
Shokri A; Khajeh S; Khavid A; Tabari S; Yarmohammadi S
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2015 Jul; 16(7):542-6. PubMed ID: 26329408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
