137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23815043)
1. Are independent pharmacies in need of special care? An argument against an antitrust exemption for collective negotiations of pharmacists.
Rosenthal DB
Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics; 2013; 13(1):198-252. PubMed ID: 23815043
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Conscience in context: pharmacist rights and the eroding moral marketplace.
Vischer RK
Stanford Law Pol Rev; 2006; 17(1):83-119. PubMed ID: 17165232
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Drug maker's efforts to compete in lucrative insulin market are under scrutiny.
Harris G; Pear R
N Y Times Web; 2006 Jan; ():A14. PubMed ID: 16453399
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Physician negotiations with managed care plans: an antitrust primer.
Ronai SE; Hudner HK
Med Staff Couns; 1993; 7(3):57-66. PubMed ID: 10126801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Finance issue brief: any willing provider: year end report-2002.
Morgan R; MacEachern L
Issue Brief Health Policy Track Serv; 2002 Dec; ():1-10. PubMed ID: 12884878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Emergency contraception, institutional conscience, and pharmacy practice.
Card RF; Williams KG
J Pharm Pract; 2014 Apr; 27(2):174-7. PubMed ID: 24352808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Pharmacies take uniform price demands to court.
Moskowitz DB
J Am Health Policy; 1994; 4(4):24-7. PubMed ID: 10136676
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Seducing the medical profession.
N Y Times Web; 2006 Feb; ():A22. PubMed ID: 16502529
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Texas' new physician collective bargaining statute: helping to fatten physicians' wallets and make patients' leaner.
Mayo TW; King JP
Health Care Law Mon; 1999 Sep; ():3-13. PubMed ID: 10623065
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Apothecaries and pharmacies in the Radziwill family estates in the 18th century].
Zuba K
Kwart Hist Kult Mater; 2001; 49(4):345-66. PubMed ID: 18705164
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Pharmacy practice developments: the potential impact on pharmacists' legal liability.
Hattingh L; Forrester K; Smith N; Searle J
J Law Med; 2007 Feb; 14(3):397-402. PubMed ID: 17355101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Illinois pharmacies ordered to provide birth control.
Davey M
N Y Times Web; 2005 Apr; ():A10. PubMed ID: 15940858
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Antitrust, health care quality, and the courts.
Hammer PJ; Sage WM
Columbia Law Rev; 2002 Apr; 102(3):545-649. PubMed ID: 11985363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Pharmaceutical pricing. Let the market decide who gets discounts.
Mossinghoff GJ
Health Syst Rev; 1995; 28(1):24-5. PubMed ID: 10139754
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Revised antitrust guidelines. Forming physician network joint ventures.
Anderson KR
Physician Exec; 1997 Feb; 23(2):24-6. PubMed ID: 10164971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Intersection of quality metrics and Medicare policy.
Nau DP
Ann Pharmacother; 2011 Dec; 45(12):1582-4. PubMed ID: 22045907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A conflict of interest: why peer review committees need heightened scrutiny under federal antitrust law.
Rakestraw E
J Leg Med; 2009; 30(4):563-78. PubMed ID: 19953408
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The Feds ease antitrust rules--cautiously.
Guglielmo WJ
Med Econ; 2002 Jun; 79(12):55-6. PubMed ID: 12119738
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The regulation of pharmacy ownership in Australia: the potential impact of changes to the health landscape.
Hattingh HL
J Law Med; 2011 Sep; 19(1):147-54. PubMed ID: 21988016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. FDA inspections of pharmacies: what should you do?
Gibbs JN
Am Pharm; 1995 May; NS35(5):32-3, 35. PubMed ID: 7611135
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]