These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

317 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23815073)

  • 1. Value of Bishop score and ultrasound cervical length measurement in the prediction of cesarean delivery.
    Cubal A; Carvalho J; Ferreira MJ; Rodrigues G; Carmo OD
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2013 Sep; 39(9):1391-6. PubMed ID: 23815073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Transvaginal sonographic measurement of cervical length vs. Bishop score in labor induction at term: tolerability and prediction of Cesarean delivery.
    Tan PC; Vallikkannu N; Suguna S; Quek KF; Hassan J
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2007 May; 29(5):568-73. PubMed ID: 17444553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Transvaginal ultrasound measurement of cervical length in the supine and upright positions versus Bishop score in predicting successful induction of labor at term.
    Meijer-Hoogeveen M; Roos C; Arabin B; Stoutenbeek P; Visser GH
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Feb; 33(2):213-20. PubMed ID: 19173229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Bishop Score vs. ultrasound cervical length in the prediction of cervical ripening success and vaginal delivery in nulliparous women.
    Kehila M; Bougmiza I; Ben Hmid R; Abdelfatteh W; Mahjoub S; Channoufi MB
    Minerva Ginecol; 2015 Dec; 67(6):499-505. PubMed ID: 25964145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Transvaginal ultrasound assessment of the cervix and digital examination before labor induction].
    Gomes F; Ramalho C; Machado AP; Calado E; Cardoso F; Montenegro N
    Acta Med Port; 2006; 19(2):109-14. PubMed ID: 17187711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bishop score and ultrasound assessment of the cervix for prediction of time to onset of labor and time to delivery in prolonged pregnancy.
    Strobel E; Sladkevicius P; Rovas L; De Smet F; Karlsson ED; Valentin L
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Sep; 28(3):298-305. PubMed ID: 16817173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Transvaginal sonography of the uterine cervix prior to labor induction.
    Gabriel R; Darnaud T; Chalot F; Gonzalez N; Leymarie F; Quereux C
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Mar; 19(3):254-7. PubMed ID: 11896946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Ultrasound cervical length measurement in prediction of labor induction outcome.
    Kehila M; Abouda HS; Sahbi K; Cheour H; Chanoufi MB
    J Neonatal Perinatal Med; 2016 May; 9(2):127-31. PubMed ID: 27197935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The value of ultrasound in the prediction of successful induction of labor.
    Rane SM; Guirgis RR; Higgins B; Nicolaides KH
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Oct; 24(5):538-49. PubMed ID: 15386612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Preinduction sonographic measurement of cervical length in the prediction of successful induction of labor.
    Pandis GK; Papageorghiou AT; Ramanathan VG; Thompson MO; Nicolaides KH
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Dec; 18(6):623-8. PubMed ID: 11844202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prediction of the risk of cesarean delivery after labor induction in twin gestations based on clinical and ultrasound parameters.
    Han BR; Park KH; Lee SY; Jung EY; Park JW
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2016 Sep; 42(9):1125-31. PubMed ID: 27199212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Transvaginal ultrasonographic cervical measurement in predicting failed labor induction and cesarean delivery for failure to progress in nulliparous women.
    Park KH
    J Korean Med Sci; 2007 Aug; 22(4):722-7. PubMed ID: 17728517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sonographic cervical length as a predictor of type of delivery after induced labor.
    Gómez-Laencina AM; García CP; Asensio LV; Ponce JA; Martínez MS; Martínez-Vizcaíno V
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Jun; 285(6):1523-8. PubMed ID: 22198844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison between sonographic cervical length and Bishop score in preinduction cervical assessment: a randomized trial.
    Park KH; Kim SN; Lee SY; Jeong EH; Jung HJ; Oh KJ
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Aug; 38(2):198-204. PubMed ID: 21484904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of the Bishop score, body mass index and transvaginal cervical length in predicting the success of labor induction.
    Uyar Y; Erbay G; Demir BC; Baytur Y
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2009 Sep; 280(3):357-62. PubMed ID: 19130065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ultrasound assessment of fetal head-perineum distance before induction of labor.
    Eggebø TM; Heien C; Økland I; Gjessing LK; Romundstad P; Salvesen KA
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Aug; 32(2):199-204. PubMed ID: 18528923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The predictive value of cervical shear wave elastography in the outcome of labor induction.
    Lu J; Cheng YKY; Ho SYS; Sahota DS; Hui LL; Poon LC; Leung TY
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2020 Jan; 99(1):59-68. PubMed ID: 31691266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bishop score and cervical length at 33-35 weeks of gestation and the risk of intrapartum cesarean delivery of twins.
    Park KH; Lee SY; Jeong EH; Ryu A; Oh KJ; Kim SN
    J Perinat Med; 2012 Mar; 40(4):383-8. PubMed ID: 22752769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison between subjective and objective assessments of the cervix before induction of labour.
    Elghorori MR; Hassan I; Dartey W; Abdel-Aziz E; Bradley M
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2006 Aug; 26(6):521-6. PubMed ID: 17000497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bishop score and risk of cesarean delivery after induction of labor in nulliparous women.
    Vrouenraets FP; Roumen FJ; Dehing CJ; van den Akker ES; Aarts MJ; Scheve EJ
    Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Apr; 105(4):690-7. PubMed ID: 15802392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.