These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23815384)

  • 1. Does constraining field of view prevent extraction of geometric cues for humans during virtual-environment reorientation?
    Sturz BR; Kilday ZA; Bodily KD
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2013 Oct; 39(4):390-6. PubMed ID: 23815384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Beacons and surface features differentially influence human reliance on global and local geometric cues when reorienting in a virtual environment.
    Bodily KD; Kilday ZA; Eastman CK; Gaskin KA; Graves AA; Roberts JE; Sturz BR
    Behav Processes; 2013 Feb; 93():71-81. PubMed ID: 23089385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Enclosure size and the use of local and global geometric cues for reorientation.
    Sturz BR; Forloines MR; Bodily KD
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2012 Apr; 19(2):270-6. PubMed ID: 22218783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Environmental scaling influences the use of local but not global geometric cues during spatial reorientation.
    Sturz BR; Bell ZK; Bodily KD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Jul; 44(7):1159-1166. PubMed ID: 29239623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Use of local and global geometry from object arrays by adult humans.
    Reichert JF; Kelly DM
    Behav Processes; 2011 Feb; 86(2):196-205. PubMed ID: 21144887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Neither by global nor local cues alone: evidence for a unified orientation process.
    Bodily KD; Eastman CK; Sturz BR
    Anim Cogn; 2011 Sep; 14(5):665-74. PubMed ID: 21509592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Orientation in trapezoid-shaped enclosures: implications for theoretical accounts of geometry learning.
    Sturz BR; Gurley T; Bodily KD
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2011 Apr; 37(2):246-53. PubMed ID: 21319918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Size does not matter, but features do: Clark's nutcrackers (Nucifraga columbiana) weigh features more heavily than geometry in large and small enclosures.
    Lambinet V; Wilzeck C; Kelly DM
    Behav Processes; 2014 Feb; 102():3-11. PubMed ID: 24378211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Geometric cues, reference frames, and the equivalence of experienced-aligned and novel-aligned views in human spatial memory.
    Kelly JW; Sjolund LA; Sturz BR
    Cognition; 2013 Mar; 126(3):459-74. PubMed ID: 23305700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Environment size and the use of feature and geometric cues for reorientation.
    Sturz BR; Kelly DM
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2013 Feb; 142(2):251-8. PubMed ID: 23370045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Separate geometric and non-geometric modules for spatial reorientation: evidence from a lopsided animal brain.
    Vallortigara G; Pagni P; Sovrano VA
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2004 Apr; 16(3):390-400. PubMed ID: 15072675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reorienting when cues conflict: evidence for an adaptive-combination view.
    Ratliff KR; Newcombe NS
    Psychol Sci; 2008 Dec; 19(12):1301-7. PubMed ID: 19121141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Angles no longer weigh in: The effect of geometric cue directness on reorientation.
    Huang Z; Hu Q; Shao Y
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Jul; 43(7):1147-1153. PubMed ID: 28114779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Enclosure shape influences cue competition effects and goal location learning.
    Wilson PN; Alexander T
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Aug; 63(8):1552-67. PubMed ID: 20119881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Rats' use of geometric, featural and orientation cues to locate a hidden goal.
    Batty ER; Hoban L; Spetch ML; Dickson CT
    Behav Processes; 2009 Nov; 82(3):327-34. PubMed ID: 19683037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Use of geometric properties of landmark arrays for reorientation relative to remote cities and local objects.
    Mou W; Nankoo JF; Zhou R; Spetch ML
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Mar; 40(2):476-91. PubMed ID: 24245534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Overtraining and the use of feature and geometric cues for reorientation.
    Sturz BR; Gaskin KA; Bodily KD
    Psychol Res; 2013 Mar; 77(2):176-82. PubMed ID: 22212980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Growing in circles: rearing environment alters spatial navigation in fish.
    Brown AA; Spetch ML; Hurd PL
    Psychol Sci; 2007 Jul; 18(7):569-73. PubMed ID: 17614863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Malleability in the development of spatial reorientation.
    Twyman AD; Newcombe NS; Gould TJ
    Dev Psychobiol; 2013 Apr; 55(3):243-55. PubMed ID: 22407824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of reference frames and number of cues available on the spatial orientation of males and females in a virtual memory task.
    Cánovas R; García RF; Cimadevilla JM
    Behav Brain Res; 2011 Jan; 216(1):116-21. PubMed ID: 20655953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.