These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

399 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23815650)

  • 21. Operational sex ratio predicts the opportunity and direction of sexual selection across animals.
    Janicke T; Morrow EH
    Ecol Lett; 2018 Mar; 21(3):384-391. PubMed ID: 29341415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Sexually antagonistic selection, sexual dimorphism, and the resolution of intralocus sexual conflict.
    Cox RM; Calsbeek R
    Am Nat; 2009 Feb; 173(2):176-87. PubMed ID: 19138156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A life-history perspective on sexual selection in a polygamous species.
    Gao K; van Wijk M; Clement Z; Egas M; Groot AT
    BMC Evol Biol; 2020 May; 20(1):53. PubMed ID: 32380947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Selection on body size and sexual size dimorphism differs between host species in a seed-feeding beetle.
    Fox CW; Czesak ME
    J Evol Biol; 2006 Jul; 19(4):1167-74. PubMed ID: 16780517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Sperm competition favors harmful males in seed beetles.
    Hotzy C; Arnqvist G
    Curr Biol; 2009 Mar; 19(5):404-7. PubMed ID: 19230665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Selection in a fluctuating environment and the evolution of sexual dimorphism in the seed beetle Callosobruchus maculatus.
    Hallsson LR; Björklund M
    J Evol Biol; 2012 Aug; 25(8):1564-75. PubMed ID: 22594940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Sperm competition games between sneaks and guards: a comparative analysis using dimorphic male beetles.
    Simmons LW; Emlen DJ; Tomkins JL
    Evolution; 2007 Nov; 61(11):2684-92. PubMed ID: 17941836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Mating system and demographic constraints on the opportunity for sexual selection.
    Wiegmann DD; Nguyen T
    Theor Popul Biol; 2006 Feb; 69(1):34-47. PubMed ID: 16257429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Sexual selection affects the evolution of lifespan and ageing in the decorated cricket Gryllodes sigillatus.
    Archer CR; Zajitschek F; Sakaluk SK; Royle NJ; Hunt J
    Evolution; 2012 Oct; 66(10):3088-100. PubMed ID: 23025600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Inconsistency between different measures of sexual selection.
    Fitze PS; Le Galliard JF
    Am Nat; 2011 Aug; 178(2):256-68. PubMed ID: 21750388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Bateman's principle and immunity: phenotypically plastic reproductive strategies predict changes in immunological sex differences.
    McKean KA; Nunney L
    Evolution; 2005 Jul; 59(7):1510-7. PubMed ID: 16153036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Sexual selection affects lifespan and aging in the seed beetle.
    Maklakov AA; Fricke C; Arnqvist G
    Aging Cell; 2007 Dec; 6(6):739-44. PubMed ID: 17725688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Sexual selection and the evolution of secondary sexual traits: sex comb evolution in Drosophila.
    Snook RR; Gidaszewski NA; Chapman T; Simmons LW
    J Evol Biol; 2013 Apr; 26(4):912-8. PubMed ID: 23496332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Degree of anisogamy is unrelated to the intensity of sexual selection.
    Mokos J; Scheuring I; Liker A; Freckleton RP; Székely T
    Sci Rep; 2021 Sep; 11(1):19424. PubMed ID: 34593863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Relative abundance and the species-specific reinforcement of male mating preference in the Chrysochus (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) hybrid zone.
    Peterson MA; Honchak BM; Locke SE; Beeman TE; Mendoza J; Green J; Buckingham KJ; White MA; Monsen KJ
    Evolution; 2005 Dec; 59(12):2639-55. PubMed ID: 16526511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Bateman gradients reflect variation in sexual selection in a species with dynamic sex roles.
    Hare RM; Simmons LW
    J Evol Biol; 2022 Sep; 35(9):1206-1217. PubMed ID: 35932479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Mating systems and sexual selection in male-pregnant pipefishes and seahorses: insights from microsatellite-based studies of maternity.
    Jones AG; Avise JC
    J Hered; 2001; 92(2):150-8. PubMed ID: 11396573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Operational sex ratio, sexual conflict and the intensity of sexual selection.
    Fitze PS; Le Galliard JF
    Ecol Lett; 2008 May; 11(5):432-9. PubMed ID: 18279355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Monogamy and the battle of the sexes.
    Hosken DJ; Stockley P; Tregenza T; Wedell N
    Annu Rev Entomol; 2009; 54():361-78. PubMed ID: 18793102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Parental investment, sexual selection and sex ratios.
    Kokko H; Jennions MD
    J Evol Biol; 2008 Jul; 21(4):919-48. PubMed ID: 18462318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.