These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

235 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23816180)

  • 1. Dispelling urban myths about default uncertainty factors in chemical risk assessment--sufficient protection against mixture effects?
    Martin OV; Martin S; Kortenkamp A
    Environ Health; 2013 Jul; 12(1):53. PubMed ID: 23816180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
    Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The use of toxicokinetic and toxicodynamic data in risk assessment: an international perspective.
    Gundert-Remy U; Sonich-Mullin C;
    Sci Total Environ; 2002 Apr; 288(1-2):3-11. PubMed ID: 12013545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dosimetric adjustments for interspecies extrapolation of inhaled poorly soluble particles (PSP).
    Jarabek AM; Asgharian B; Miller FJ
    Inhal Toxicol; 2005; 17(7-8):317-34. PubMed ID: 16020031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Characterization of the human kinetic adjustment factor for the health risk assessment of environmental contaminants.
    Valcke M; Krishnan K
    J Appl Toxicol; 2014 Mar; 34(3):227-40. PubMed ID: 24038072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Just who is at risk? The ethics of environmental regulation.
    Simon T
    Hum Exp Toxicol; 2011 Aug; 30(8):795-819. PubMed ID: 20670991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A new effect residual ratio (ERR) method for the validation of the concentration addition and independent action models.
    Wang LJ; Liu SS; Zhang J; Li WY
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2010 Jun; 17(5):1080-9. PubMed ID: 19949878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessing the risks of exposures to multiple chemicals with a common mechanism of toxicity: how to cumulate?
    Wilkinson CF; Christoph GR; Julien E; Kelley JM; Kronenberg J; McCarthy J; Reiss R
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2000 Feb; 31(1):30-43. PubMed ID: 10715222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Characterizing the noncancer toxicity of mixtures using concepts from the TTC and quantitative models of uncertainty in mixture toxicity.
    Price PS; Hollnagel HM; Zabik JM
    Risk Anal; 2009 Nov; 29(11):1534-48. PubMed ID: 19886945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Ten years of research on synergisms and antagonisms in chemical mixtures: A systematic review and quantitative reappraisal of mixture studies.
    Martin O; Scholze M; Ermler S; McPhie J; Bopp SK; Kienzler A; Parissis N; Kortenkamp A
    Environ Int; 2021 Jan; 146():106206. PubMed ID: 33120228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. On the translation of uncertainty from toxicokinetic to toxicodynamic models--the TCDD example.
    Heinzl H; Mittlböck M; Edler L
    Chemosphere; 2007 Apr; 67(9):S365-74. PubMed ID: 17224175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reducing uncertainty in risk assessment by using specific knowledge to replace default options.
    McClellan RO
    Drug Metab Rev; 1996; 28(1-2):149-79. PubMed ID: 8744594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Identification of novel uncertainty factors and thresholds of toxicological concern for health hazard and risk assessment: Application to cleaning product ingredients.
    Wang Z; Scott WC; Williams ES; Ciarlo M; DeLeo PC; Brooks BW
    Environ Int; 2018 Apr; 113():357-376. PubMed ID: 29452931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessing human health response in life cycle assessment using ED10s and DALYs: part 2--Noncancer effects.
    Pennington D; Crettaz P; Tauxe A; Rhomberg L; Brand K; Jolliet O
    Risk Anal; 2002 Oct; 22(5):947-63. PubMed ID: 12442991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Probabilistic framework for the estimation of the adult and child toxicokinetic intraspecies uncertainty factors.
    Pelekis M; Nicolich MJ; Gauthier JS
    Risk Anal; 2003 Dec; 23(6):1239-55. PubMed ID: 14641898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Determination of a site-specific reference dose for methylmercury for fish-eating populations.
    Shipp AM; Gentry PR; Lawrence G; Van Landingham C; Covington T; Clewell HJ; Gribben K; Crump K
    Toxicol Ind Health; 2000 Nov; 16(9-10):335-438. PubMed ID: 11762928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Recommendations to address uncertainties in environmental risk assessment using toxicokinetic-toxicodynamic models.
    Baudrot V; Charles S
    Sci Rep; 2019 Aug; 9(1):11432. PubMed ID: 31391484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Percentiles of the product of uncertainty factors for establishing probabilistic reference doses.
    Gaylor DW; Kodell RL
    Risk Anal; 2000 Apr; 20(2):245-50. PubMed ID: 10859783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Draft DG SANCO document: addressing the new challenges for risk assessment--an industry perspective.
    Campbell P; Dohmen P
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2013 Jul; 9(3):e81-4. PubMed ID: 23564648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparative influences of dermal and inhalational routes of exposure on hazards of cleaning product ingredients among mammalian model organisms.
    Wang Z; Wang YYL; Scott WC; Williams ES; Ciarlo M; DeLeo P; Brooks BW
    Environ Int; 2021 Dec; 157():106777. PubMed ID: 34314977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.