These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23816295)

  • 1. Integrated 2D and 3D mammography.
    Sumkin JH
    Lancet Oncol; 2013 Jul; 14(8):e292-3. PubMed ID: 23816295
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Integration of 3D digital mammography with tomosynthesis for population breast-cancer screening (STORM): a prospective comparison study.
    Ciatto S; Houssami N; Bernardi D; Caumo F; Pellegrini M; Brunelli S; Tuttobene P; Bricolo P; Fantò C; Valentini M; Montemezzi S; Macaskill P
    Lancet Oncol; 2013 Jun; 14(7):583-9. PubMed ID: 23623721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Breast cancer screening with tomosynthesis (3D mammography) with acquired or synthetic 2D mammography compared with 2D mammography alone (STORM-2): a population-based prospective study.
    Bernardi D; Macaskill P; Pellegrini M; Valentini M; Fantò C; Ostillio L; Tuttobene P; Luparia A; Houssami N
    Lancet Oncol; 2016 Aug; 17(8):1105-1113. PubMed ID: 27345635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Screening mammography after autologous breast reconstruction is not beneficial.
    Barton MK
    CA Cancer J Clin; 2015; 65(1):3-4. PubMed ID: 25533748
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mammorgraphy reporting at Tygerberg hospital, Cape Town, South Africa.
    Pitcher R; Lotz J; Ackermann C; Bagadia A; Davis R; du Plessis AM; Griffith-Richards S; Hattingh R; Wagener G
    S Afr Med J; 2014 Jul; 104(7):456. PubMed ID: 25298984
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Measuring the Effectiveness of Mammography.
    Chen WY
    JAMA Oncol; 2015 Nov; 1(8):1037-8. PubMed ID: 26501739
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Optimizing Mammography Screening Intervals.
    Yi M; Hunt KK
    JAMA; 2015 Oct; 314(15):1635-6. PubMed ID: 26501538
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of full-field digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis in ultrasonography-detected breast cancers.
    Nam KJ; Han BK; Ko ES; Choi JS; Ko EY; Jeong DW; Choo KS
    Breast; 2015 Oct; 24(5):649-55. PubMed ID: 26292782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Follow-up of B3 breast lesions without residual microcalcifications post vacuum-assisted biopsy, can contrast-enhanced digital mammography help?
    Bicchierai G; Nori J; De Benedetto D; Boeri C; Vanzi E; Bianchi S; Kaur Gill M; Cirone D; Miele V
    Breast J; 2020 Feb; 26(2):299-302. PubMed ID: 31486197
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Contrast-Enhanced Digital Mammography in the Surgical Management of Breast Cancer.
    Ali-Mucheru M; Pockaj B; Patel B; Pizzitola V; Wasif N; Stucky CC; Gray R
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Dec; 23(Suppl 5):649-655. PubMed ID: 27638679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Does breast screening offer a survival benefit? A retrospective comparative study of oncological outcomes of screen-detected and symptomatic early stage breast cancer cases.
    Újhelyi M; Pukancsik D; Kelemen P; Kovács E; Kenessey I; Udvarhelyi N; Bak M; Kovács T; Mátrai Z
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2016 Dec; 42(12):1814-1820. PubMed ID: 27424787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Re: Comparison of conventional and automated breast volume ultrasound in the description and characterization of solid breast masses based on BI-RADS features.
    Meng ZY; Hu B; Shen E
    Breast Cancer; 2014 Nov; 21(6):774-5. PubMed ID: 25224719
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The value of mammography within 1 year of conservative surgery for breast cancer.
    Lewis JL; Tartter PI
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2012 Oct; 19(10):3218-22. PubMed ID: 22766990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Staging of breast cancer with ultrasound.
    Yang WT
    Semin Ultrasound CT MR; 2011 Aug; 32(4):331-41. PubMed ID: 21782123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Screening mammography following autologous breast reconstruction: an unnecessary effort.
    Freyvogel M; Padia S; Larson K; Dietz J; Grobmyer S; O'Rourke C; Valente S
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2014 Oct; 21(10):3256-60. PubMed ID: 25059787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Overdiagnosis in mammography screening: a 45 year journey from shadowy idea to acknowledged reality.
    Barratt A
    BMJ; 2015 Mar; 350():h867. PubMed ID: 25736426
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A Novel Technique Using Intraoperative Fluoroscopy as a Tool to Achieve Negative Margins for Wire-Guided Partial Mastectomies.
    Beierle SP; Heidel E; Lewis J; Stewart E; McLoughlin J
    Am Surg; 2016 Sep; 82(9):e236-7. PubMed ID: 27670531
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of appropriate short-term mammographic surveillance in patients who undergo breast-conserving Surgery (BCS).
    Gunia SR; Merrigan TL; Poulton TB; Mamounas EP
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2012 Oct; 19(10):3139-43. PubMed ID: 22872291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mammographic screening for breast cancer in a resource-restricted environment.
    Apffelstaedt SP; Dalmayer L; Baatjes K
    S Afr Med J; 2014 Apr; 104(4):294-6. PubMed ID: 25118556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessment of grating-based X-ray phase-contrast CT for differentiation of invasive ductal carcinoma and ductal carcinoma in situ in an experimental ex vivo set-up.
    Sztrókay A; Herzen J; Auweter SD; Liebhardt S; Mayr D; Willner M; Hahn D; Zanette I; Weitkamp T; Hellerhoff K; Pfeiffer F; Reiser MF; Bamberg F
    Eur Radiol; 2013 Feb; 23(2):381-7. PubMed ID: 22932738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.