BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

472 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23816590)

  • 1. Adaptive testing for psychological assessment: how many items are enough to run an adaptive testing algorithm?
    Wagner-Menghin MM; Masters GN
    J Appl Meas; 2013; 14(2):106-17. PubMed ID: 23816590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of item pool restriction on the precision of ability measurement for a Rasch-based CAT: comparisons to traditional fixed length examinations.
    Halkitis PN
    J Outcome Meas; 1998; 2(2):97-122. PubMed ID: 9661734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Using the dichotomous Rasch model to analyze polytomous items.
    He Q; Wheadon C
    J Appl Meas; 2013; 14(1):44-56. PubMed ID: 23442327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Impact of Item Parameter Drift in Computer Adaptive Testing (CAT).
    Risk N
    J Appl Meas; 2016; 17(1):54-78. PubMed ID: 26784378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. On initial item selection in cognitive diagnostic computerized adaptive testing.
    Xu G; Wang C; Shang Z
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2016 Nov; 69(3):291-315. PubMed ID: 27435032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Optimal Online Calibration Designs for Item Replenishment in Adaptive Testing.
    He Y; Chen P
    Psychometrika; 2020 Mar; 85(1):35-55. PubMed ID: 31531789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Developing new online calibration methods for multidimensional computerized adaptive testing.
    Chen P; Wang C; Xin T; Chang HH
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2017 Feb; 70(1):81-117. PubMed ID: 28130937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Accounting for Local Dependence with the Rasch Model: The Paradox of Information Increase.
    Andrich D
    J Appl Meas; 2016; 17(3):262-282. PubMed ID: 28027051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Marginal likelihood inference for a model for item responses and response times.
    Glas CA; van der Linden WJ
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2010 Nov; 63(Pt 3):603-26. PubMed ID: 20109271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. DIF Cancellation in the Rasch Model.
    Wyse AE
    J Appl Meas; 2013; 14(2):118-28. PubMed ID: 23816591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Features of the sampling distribution of the ability estimate in computerized adaptive testing according to two stopping rules.
    Blais JG; Raiche G
    J Appl Meas; 2010; 11(4):424-31. PubMed ID: 21164229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Measuring alternative learning outcomes: dispositions to study in higher education.
    Pampaka M; Williams J; Hutcheson G; Black L; Davis P; Hernandez-Martinez P; Wake G
    J Appl Meas; 2013; 14(2):197-218. PubMed ID: 23816596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Examining the Psychometric Quality of Multiple-Choice Assessment Items using Mokken Scale Analysis.
    Wind SA
    J Appl Meas; 2016; 17(2):142-165. PubMed ID: 28009581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Applying computerized adaptive testing to the CES-D scale: a simulation study.
    Smits N; Cuijpers P; van Straten A
    Psychiatry Res; 2011 Jun; 188(1):147-55. PubMed ID: 21208660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Computerized adaptive testing: a mixture item selection approach for constrained situations.
    Leung CK; Chang HH; Hau KT
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2005 Nov; 58(Pt 2):239-57. PubMed ID: 16293199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Binary items and beyond: a simulation of computer adaptive testing using the Rasch partial credit model.
    Lange R
    J Appl Meas; 2008; 9(1):81-104. PubMed ID: 18180552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Conditional pairwise person parameter estimates in Rasch models.
    Kreiner S
    J Appl Meas; 2012; 13(4):314-20. PubMed ID: 23270977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Rasch fit statistics as a test of the invariance of item parameter estimates.
    Smith RM; Suh KK
    J Appl Meas; 2003; 4(2):153-63. PubMed ID: 12748407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A Study of Rasch, partial credit, and rating scale model parameter recovery in WINSTEPS and jMetrik.
    Meyer JP; Hailey E
    J Appl Meas; 2012; 13(3):248-58. PubMed ID: 23234828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluating the usefulness of computerized adaptive testing for medical in-course assessment.
    Kreiter CD; Ferguson K; Gruppen LD
    Acad Med; 1999 Oct; 74(10):1125-8. PubMed ID: 10536635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 24.