113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23817818)
1. Accuracy of stop-cursor method for determining systolic and pulse pressure variation.
Tyler L; Greco S; Bridges E; Barnes S; Brown L; Green KG; Wolfson D
Am J Crit Care; 2013 Jul; 22(4):298-305. PubMed ID: 23817818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Measurement of systolic pressure variation during graded volume loss using simple tools on Datex Ohmeda S/5 monitor.
Durga P; Jonnavittula N; Muthuchellappan R; Ramachandran G
J Neurosurg Anesthesiol; 2009 Apr; 21(2):161-4. PubMed ID: 19295396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Non-invasive measurement of pulse pressure variation and systolic pressure variation using a finger cuff corresponds with intra-arterial measurement.
Lansdorp B; Ouweneel D; de Keijzer A; van der Hoeven JG; Lemson J; Pickkers P
Br J Anaesth; 2011 Oct; 107(4):540-5. PubMed ID: 21700612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prediction of fluid responsiveness in acute respiratory distress syndrome patients ventilated with low tidal volume and high positive end-expiratory pressure.
Huang CC; Fu JY; Hu HC; Kao KC; Chen NH; Hsieh MJ; Tsai YH
Crit Care Med; 2008 Oct; 36(10):2810-6. PubMed ID: 18766099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Pulse pressure variation and systolic pressure variation in horses undergoing general anesthesia.
Fielding CL; Stolba DN
J Vet Emerg Crit Care (San Antonio); 2012 Jun; 22(3):372-5. PubMed ID: 22702443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Efficacy of functional hemodynamic parameters in predicting fluid responsiveness with pulse power analysis in surgical patients.
Cecconi M; Monti G; Hamilton MA; Puntis M; Dawson D; Tuccillo ML; Della Rocca G; Grounds RM; Rhodes A
Minerva Anestesiol; 2012 May; 78(5):527-33. PubMed ID: 22534733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The respiratory change in preejection period: a new method to predict fluid responsiveness.
Bendjelid K; Suter PM; Romand JA
J Appl Physiol (1985); 2004 Jan; 96(1):337-42. PubMed ID: 14660495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison between pulse pressure variation and systolic pressure variation measured from a peripheral artery for accurately predicting fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated dogs.
Dalmagro TL; Teixeira-Neto FJ; Celeita-Rodríguez N; Garofalo NA; López-Castañeda B; Nascimento-Junior PD
Vet Anaesth Analg; 2021 Jul; 48(4):501-508. PubMed ID: 34020897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Functional haemodynamic monitoring: The value of SVV as measured by the LiDCORapid™ in predicting fluid responsiveness in high risk vascular surgical patients.
Willars C; Dada A; Hughes T; Green D
Int J Surg; 2012; 10(3):148-52. PubMed ID: 22330275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Static and dynamic pressure-volume curves reflect different aspects of respiratory system mechanics in experimental acute respiratory distress syndrome.
Adams AB; Cakar N; Marini JJ
Respir Care; 2001 Jul; 46(7):686-93. PubMed ID: 11455939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of arterial systolic pressure variation with other clinical parameters to predict the response to fluid challenges during cardiac surgery.
Bennett-Guerrero E; Kahn RA; Moskowitz DM; Falcucci O; Bodian CA
Mt Sinai J Med; 2002; 69(1-2):96-100. PubMed ID: 11832979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparisons of predictive performance of breathing pattern variability measured during T-piece, automatic tube compensation, and pressure support ventilation for weaning intensive care unit patients from mechanical ventilation.
Bien MY; Shui Lin Y; Shih CH; Yang YL; Lin HW; Bai KJ; Wang JH; Ru Kou Y
Crit Care Med; 2011 Oct; 39(10):2253-62. PubMed ID: 21666447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Using an expiratory resistor, arterial pulse pressure variations predict fluid responsiveness during spontaneous breathing: an experimental porcine study.
Dahl MK; Vistisen ST; Koefoed-Nielsen J; Larsson A
Crit Care; 2009; 13(2):R39. PubMed ID: 19302700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Predicting volume responsiveness by using the end-expiratory occlusion in mechanically ventilated intensive care unit patients.
Monnet X; Osman D; Ridel C; Lamia B; Richard C; Teboul JL
Crit Care Med; 2009 Mar; 37(3):951-6. PubMed ID: 19237902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Positive end-expiratory pressure-induced functional recruitment in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome.
Di Marco F; Devaquet J; Lyazidi A; Galia F; da Costa NP; Fumagalli R; Brochard L
Crit Care Med; 2010 Jan; 38(1):127-32. PubMed ID: 19730254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Influence of pressure- and volume-controlled ventilation on pulse pressure variations: randomized study].
Guillon A; Espitalier F; Ehrmann S; Masseret E; Laffon M
Ann Fr Anesth Reanim; 2013 Sep; 32(9):548-53. PubMed ID: 23948023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [A comparison between systolic pressure variations under mechanical ventilation and classic pressure parameters in predicting fluid responsiveness in patients after coronary surgery].
Bubenek S; Giurgiuman L; Miclea I; Boros C; Iliescu V; Vasile R
Chirurgia (Bucur); 2006; 101(3):307-12. PubMed ID: 16927920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of methods of measuring pulmonary artery pressure.
Lundstedt JL
Am J Crit Care; 1997 Jul; 6(4):324-32. PubMed ID: 9215431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Pulmonary artery pressure measurement in patients with elevated pressures: effect of backrest elevation and method of measurement.
Dobbin K; Wallace S; Ahlberg J; Chulay M
Am J Crit Care; 1992 Sep; 1(2):61-9. PubMed ID: 1307892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Online monitoring of pulse pressure variation to guide fluid therapy after cardiac surgery.
Auler JO; Galas F; Hajjar L; Santos L; Carvalho T; Michard F
Anesth Analg; 2008 Apr; 106(4):1201-6, table of contents. PubMed ID: 18349193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
