BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23818434)

  • 1. Risk-stratified imputation in survival analysis.
    Kennedy RE; Adragni KP; Tiwari HK; Voeks JH; Brott TG; Howard G
    Clin Trials; 2013 Aug; 10(4):530-9. PubMed ID: 23818434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
    Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Strengthening the interpretability of clinical trial results by assessing the effect of informative censoring on the primary estimand in PRECISION.
    Bao W; Gaffney M; Pressler ML; Fayyad R; Wisemandle W; Beckerman B; Wolski KE; Nissen SE
    Clin Trials; 2020 Oct; 17(5):535-544. PubMed ID: 32643966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Survival analysis using auxiliary variables via non-parametric multiple imputation.
    Hsu CH; Taylor JM; Murray S; Commenges D
    Stat Med; 2006 Oct; 25(20):3503-17. PubMed ID: 16345047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Using audit information to adjust parameter estimates for data errors in clinical trials.
    Shepherd BE; Shaw PA; Dodd LE
    Clin Trials; 2012 Dec; 9(6):721-9. PubMed ID: 22848072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Partial imputation approach to analysis of repeated measurements with dependent drop-outs.
    Wei L; Shih WJ
    Stat Med; 2001 Apr; 20(8):1197-214. PubMed ID: 11304736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Estimating the effect of multiple imputation on incomplete longitudinal data with application to a randomized clinical study.
    Fong DY; Rai SN; Lam KS
    J Biopharm Stat; 2013; 23(5):1004-22. PubMed ID: 23957512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of data analysis strategies for intent-to-treat analysis in pre-test-post-test designs with substantial dropout rates.
    Salim A; Mackinnon A; Christensen H; Griffiths K
    Psychiatry Res; 2008 Sep; 160(3):335-45. PubMed ID: 18718673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Multiple imputation based on restricted mean model for censored data.
    Liu LX; Murray S; Tsodikov A
    Stat Med; 2011 May; 30(12):1339-50. PubMed ID: 21560139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Estimation of colorectal adenoma recurrence with dependent censoring.
    Hsu CH; Long Q; Alberts DS
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2009 Sep; 9():66. PubMed ID: 19788750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Distributional imputation for the analysis of censored recurrent events.
    Fairfax SR; Yang S
    Stat Med; 2024 Jun; 43(13):2622-2640. PubMed ID: 38684331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Analysis of accelerated failure time data with dependent censoring using auxiliary variables via nonparametric multiple imputation.
    Hsu CH; Taylor JM; Hu C
    Stat Med; 2015 Aug; 34(19):2768-80. PubMed ID: 25999295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Propensity score analysis with partially observed covariates: How should multiple imputation be used?
    Leyrat C; Seaman SR; White IR; Douglas I; Smeeth L; Kim J; Resche-Rigon M; Carpenter JR; Williamson EJ
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2019 Jan; 28(1):3-19. PubMed ID: 28573919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Should multiple imputation be the method of choice for handling missing data in randomized trials?
    Sullivan TR; White IR; Salter AB; Ryan P; Lee KJ
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 Sep; 27(9):2610-2626. PubMed ID: 28034175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. CondiS: A conditional survival distribution-based method for censored data imputation overcoming the hurdle in machine learning-based survival analysis.
    Wang Y; Flowers CR; Li Z; Huang X
    J Biomed Inform; 2022 Jul; 131():104117. PubMed ID: 35690348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Methods for significance testing of categorical covariates in logistic regression models after multiple imputation: power and applicability analysis.
    Eekhout I; van de Wiel MA; Heymans MW
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Aug; 17(1):129. PubMed ID: 28830466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bias and Precision of the "Multiple Imputation, Then Deletion" Method for Dealing With Missing Outcome Data.
    Sullivan TR; Salter AB; Ryan P; Lee KJ
    Am J Epidemiol; 2015 Sep; 182(6):528-34. PubMed ID: 26337075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Multiple imputation in Cox regression when there are time-varying effects of covariates.
    Keogh RH; Morris TP
    Stat Med; 2018 Nov; 37(25):3661-3678. PubMed ID: 30014575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of multiple imputation methods for handling missing values in longitudinal data in the presence of a time-varying covariate with a non-linear association with time: a simulation study.
    De Silva AP; Moreno-Betancur M; De Livera AM; Lee KJ; Simpson JA
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Jul; 17(1):114. PubMed ID: 28743256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sensitivity analysis of progression-free survival with dependent withdrawal.
    Ruan PK; Gray RJ
    Stat Med; 2008 Apr; 27(8):1180-98. PubMed ID: 17768718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.