943 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23818460)
1. Biomechanical comparison of 4 different lateral plate constructs for distal fibula fractures.
Eckel TT; Glisson RR; Anand P; Parekh SG
Foot Ankle Int; 2013 Nov; 34(11):1588-95. PubMed ID: 23818460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Biomechanical comparison of a lateral polyaxial locking plate with a posterolateral polyaxial locking plate applied to the distal fibula.
Hallbauer J; Klos K; Rausch S; Gräfenstein A; Wipf F; Beimel C; Hofmann G; Mückley T
Foot Ankle Surg; 2014 Sep; 20(3):180-5. PubMed ID: 25103705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A biomechanical comparison of one-third tubular plates versus periarticular plates for fixation of osteoporotic distal fibula fractures.
Davis AT; Israel H; Cannada LK; Bledsoe JG
J Orthop Trauma; 2013 Sep; 27(9):e201-7. PubMed ID: 23249893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Biomechanical Comparison of Intramedullary Screw Versus Low-Profile Plate Fixation of a Jones Fracture.
Huh J; Glisson RR; Matsumoto T; Easley ME
Foot Ankle Int; 2016 Apr; 37(4):411-8. PubMed ID: 26637274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Distal fibula fracture fixation: Biomechanical evaluation of three different fixation implants.
Knutsen AR; Sangiorgio SN; Liu C; Zhou S; Warganich T; Fleming J; Harris TG; Ebramzadeh E
Foot Ankle Surg; 2016 Dec; 22(4):278-285. PubMed ID: 27810029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of lateral locking plate and antiglide plate for fixation of distal fibular fractures in osteoporotic bone: a biomechanical study.
Minihane KP; Lee C; Ahn C; Zhang LQ; Merk BR
J Orthop Trauma; 2006 Sep; 20(8):562-6. PubMed ID: 16990728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Biomechanical evaluation of plate osteosynthesis of distal fibula fractures with biodegradable devices.
Klos K; Sauer S; Hoffmeier K; Gras F; Fröber R; Hofmann GO; Mückley T
Foot Ankle Int; 2009 Mar; 30(3):243-51. PubMed ID: 19321102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Can locking screws allow smaller, low-profile plates to achieve comparable stability to larger, standard plates?
Garrigues GE; Glisson RR; Garrigues NW; Richard MJ; Ruch DS
J Orthop Trauma; 2011 Jun; 25(6):347-54. PubMed ID: 21577070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Biomechanical Evaluation of Plate Versus Lag Screw Only Fixation of Distal Fibula Fractures.
Misaghi A; Doan J; Bastrom T; Pennock AT
J Foot Ankle Surg; 2015; 54(5):896-9. PubMed ID: 25990534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Plate selection for fixation of extra-articular distal humerus fractures: a biomechanical comparison of three different implants.
Scolaro JA; Hsu JE; Svach DJ; Mehta S
Injury; 2014 Dec; 45(12):2040-4. PubMed ID: 25249244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A biomechanical evaluation of locked plating for distal fibula fractures in an osteoporotic sawbone model.
Bariteau JT; Fantry A; Blankenhorn B; Lareau C; Paller D; Digiovanni CW
Foot Ankle Surg; 2014 Mar; 20(1):44-7. PubMed ID: 24480499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Does a polyaxial-locking system confer benefits for osteosynthesis of the distal fibula: A cadaver study.
Hallbauer J; Klos K; Gräfenstein A; Simons P; Rausch S; Mückley T; Hofmann GO
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2016 Sep; 102(5):645-9. PubMed ID: 27179630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A Biomechanical Comparison of Locking Versus Conventional Plate Fixation for Distal Fibula Fractures in Trimalleolar Ankle Injuries.
Nguyentat A; Camisa W; Patel S; Lagaay P
J Foot Ankle Surg; 2016; 55(1):132-5. PubMed ID: 26497086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Influence of hooks and a lag screw on internal fixation plates for lateral malleolar fracture: a biomechanical and ergonomic study.
Sakai R; Uchino M; Yoneo T; Ohtaki Y; Minehara H; Matsuura T; Gomi T; Ujihira M
J Orthop Surg Res; 2017 Feb; 12(1):34. PubMed ID: 28228100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Biomechanical evaluation of mini-fragment hardware for supination external rotation fractures of the distal fibula.
Bariteau JT; Blankenhorn BD; Lareau CR; Paller DJ; DiGiovanni CW
Foot Ankle Spec; 2013 Apr; 6(2):88-93. PubMed ID: 23439611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effect of concurrent fibular fracture on the fixation of distal tibia fractures: a laboratory comparison of intramedullary nails with locked plates.
Strauss EJ; Alfonso D; Kummer FJ; Egol KA; Tejwani NC
J Orthop Trauma; 2007 Mar; 21(3):172-7. PubMed ID: 17473753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The antiglide plate for distal fibular fixation. A biomechanical comparison with fixation with a lateral plate.
Schaffer JJ; Manoli A
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1987 Apr; 69(4):596-604. PubMed ID: 3571317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of modern locked plating and antiglide plating for fixation of osteoporotic distal fibular fractures.
Switaj PJ; Wetzel RJ; Jain NP; Weatherford BM; Ren Y; Zhang LQ; Merk BR
Foot Ankle Surg; 2016 Sep; 22(3):158-163. PubMed ID: 27502223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Mechanical comparison in cadaver specimens of three different 90-degree double-plate osteosyntheses for simulated C2-type distal humerus fractures with varying bone densities.
Schuster I; Korner J; Arzdorf M; Schwieger K; Diederichs G; Linke B
J Orthop Trauma; 2008 Feb; 22(2):113-20. PubMed ID: 18349779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Biomechanical stability of different fixation constructs for ORIF of radial neck fractures.
Capo JT; Svach D; Ahsgar J; Orillaza NS; Sabatino CT
Orthopedics; 2008 Oct; 31(10):. PubMed ID: 19226014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
