These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

403 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23818558)

  • 1. Analysis of the systematic reviews process in reports of network meta-analyses: methodological systematic review.
    Bafeta A; Trinquart L; Seror R; Ravaud P
    BMJ; 2013 Jul; 347():f3675. PubMed ID: 23818558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
    Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W
    Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reporting of results from network meta-analyses: methodological systematic review.
    Bafeta A; Trinquart L; Seror R; Ravaud P
    BMJ; 2014 Mar; 348():g1741. PubMed ID: 24618053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Abstract analysis method facilitates filtering low-methodological quality and high-bias risk systematic reviews on psoriasis interventions.
    Gómez-García F; Ruano J; Aguilar-Luque M; Alcalde-Mellado P; Gay-Mimbrera J; Hernández-Romero JL; Sanz-Cabanillas JL; Maestre-López B; González-Padilla M; Carmona-Fernández PJ; García-Nieto AV; Isla-Tejera B
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Dec; 17(1):180. PubMed ID: 29284417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reporting and Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Nursing Interventions in Patients With Alzheimer's Disease: General Implications of the Findings.
    Sun X; Zhou X; Zhang Y; Liu H
    J Nurs Scholarsh; 2019 May; 51(3):308-316. PubMed ID: 30806019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The methodological quality of individual participant data meta-analysis on intervention effects: systematic review.
    Wang H; Chen Y; Lin Y; Abesig J; Wu IX; Tam W
    BMJ; 2021 Apr; 373():n736. PubMed ID: 33875446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.
    Osborne SR; Alston LV; Bolton KA; Whelan J; Reeve E; Wong Shee A; Browne J; Walker T; Versace VL; Allender S; Nichols M; Backholer K; Goodwin N; Lewis S; Dalton H; Prael G; Curtin M; Brooks R; Verdon S; Crockett J; Hodgins G; Walsh S; Lyle DM; Thompson SC; Browne LJ; Knight S; Pit SW; Jones M; Gillam MH; Leach MJ; Gonzalez-Chica DA; Muyambi K; Eshetie T; Tran K; May E; Lieschke G; Parker V; Smith A; Hayes C; Dunlop AJ; Rajappa H; White R; Oakley P; Holliday S
    Med J Aust; 2020 Dec; 213 Suppl 11():S3-S32.e1. PubMed ID: 33314144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The quality of reports of critical care meta-analyses in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews: an independent appraisal.
    Delaney A; Bagshaw SM; Ferland A; Laupland K; Manns B; Doig C
    Crit Care Med; 2007 Feb; 35(2):589-94. PubMed ID: 17205029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A systematic assessment of Cochrane reviews and systematic reviews published in high-impact medical journals related to cancer.
    Goldkuhle M; Narayan VM; Weigl A; Dahm P; Skoetz N
    BMJ Open; 2018 Mar; 8(3):e020869. PubMed ID: 29581210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Epidemiology characteristics, reporting characteristics, and methodological quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses on traditional Chinese medicine nursing interventions published in Chinese journals.
    Yang M; Jiang L; Wang A; Xu G
    Int J Nurs Pract; 2017 Feb; 23(1):. PubMed ID: 28004476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Epidemiology, quality, and reporting characteristics of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of nursing interventions published in Chinese journals.
    Zhang J; Wang J; Han L; Zhang F; Cao J; Ma Y
    Nurs Outlook; 2015; 63(4):446-455.e4. PubMed ID: 26187084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of home telemonitoring interventions for patients with chronic diseases: a critical assessment of their methodological quality.
    Kitsiou S; Paré G; Jaana M
    J Med Internet Res; 2013 Jul; 15(7):e150. PubMed ID: 23880072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An assessment of the methodological quality of published network meta-analyses: a systematic review.
    Chambers JD; Naci H; Wouters OJ; Pyo J; Gunjal S; Kennedy IR; Hoey MG; Winn A; Neumann PJ
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(4):e0121715. PubMed ID: 25923737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reporting and methodological quality of systematic reviews in the orthopaedic literature.
    Gagnier JJ; Kellam PJ
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2013 Jun; 95(11):e771-7. PubMed ID: 23780547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Methodological quality of systematic reviews on treatments for depression: a cross-sectional study.
    Chung VCH; Wu XY; Feng Y; Ho RST; Wong SYS; Threapleton D
    Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci; 2018 Dec; 27(6):619-627. PubMed ID: 28462754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Informative value of Patient Reported Outcomes (PRO) in Health Technology Assessment (HTA).
    Brettschneider C; Lühmann D; Raspe H
    GMS Health Technol Assess; 2011 Feb; 7():Doc01. PubMed ID: 21468289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Methodological quality and risk-of-bias assessments in systematic reviews of treatments for peri-implantitis.
    Hasuike A; Ueno D; Nagashima H; Kubota T; Tsukune N; Watanabe N; Sato S
    J Periodontal Res; 2019 Aug; 54(4):374-387. PubMed ID: 30671962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of home-based, nurse-led health promotion for older people: a systematic review.
    Tappenden P; Campbell F; Rawdin A; Wong R; Kalita N
    Health Technol Assess; 2012; 16(20):1-72. PubMed ID: 22490205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Methodology and reports of systematic reviews and meta-analyses: a comparison of Cochrane reviews with articles published in paper-based journals.
    Jadad AR; Cook DJ; Jones A; Klassen TP; Tugwell P; Moher M; Moher D
    JAMA; 1998 Jul; 280(3):278-80. PubMed ID: 9676681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.