These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23818660)

  • 1. Is goal-directed attentional guidance just intertrial priming? A review.
    Lamy DF; Kristjánsson A
    J Vis; 2013 Jul; 13(3):14. PubMed ID: 23818660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Does feature intertrial priming guide attention? The jury is still out.
    Ramgir A; Lamy D
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2022 Apr; 29(2):369-393. PubMed ID: 34625924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Selection history alters attentional filter settings persistently and beyond top-down control.
    Kadel H; Feldmann-Wüstefeld T; Schubö A
    Psychophysiology; 2017 May; 54(5):736-754. PubMed ID: 28169422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Singleton search is guided by knowledge of the target, but maybe it shouldn't be.
    Chen Z; Cave KR
    Vision Res; 2015 Oct; 115(Pt A):92-103. PubMed ID: 26325392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The role of within-dimension singleton priming in visual search.
    Lamy D; Bar-Anan Y; Egeth HE
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Apr; 34(2):268-85. PubMed ID: 18377170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sources of top-down control in visual search.
    Weidner R; Krummenacher J; Reimann B; Müller HJ; Fink GR
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Nov; 21(11):2100-13. PubMed ID: 19199412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Attentional guidance by salient feature singletons depends on intertrial contingencies.
    Olivers CN; Humphreys GW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Jun; 29(3):650-7. PubMed ID: 12848331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Priming of pop-out modulates attentional target selection in visual search: behavioural and electrophysiological evidence.
    Eimer M; Kiss M; Cheung T
    Vision Res; 2010 Jun; 50(14):1353-61. PubMed ID: 19895829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mechanisms of priming of pop-out: Stored representations or feature-gain modulations?
    Lee H; Mozer MC; Vecera SP
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Jul; 71(5):1059-71. PubMed ID: 19525537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Top-down directed attention to stimulus features and attentional allocation to bottom-up deviations.
    Sawaki R; Katayama J
    J Vis; 2008 Nov; 8(15):4.1-8. PubMed ID: 19146288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Changing your mind: on the contributions of top-down and bottom-up guidance in visual search for feature singletons.
    Wolfe JM; Butcher SJ; Lee C; Hyle M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Apr; 29(2):483-502. PubMed ID: 12760630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of search mode and intertrial priming on singleton search.
    Lamy D; Carmel T; Egeth HE; Leber AB
    Percept Psychophys; 2006 Aug; 68(6):919-32. PubMed ID: 17153188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Irrelevant singletons in pop-out search: attentional capture or filtering costs?
    Becker SI
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Aug; 33(4):764-87. PubMed ID: 17683227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Influence of attentional setting and priming on the inter-trial facilitation effect on pop-out].
    Hayashi M; Kumada T
    Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 2007 Apr; 78(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 17511241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Refining the dual-stage account of intertrial feature priming: does motor response or response feature matter?
    Yashar A; Lamy D
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Oct; 73(7):2160-7. PubMed ID: 21769533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Feature-based attention elicited by precueing in an orientation discrimination task.
    Huang D; Xue L; Wang M; Hu Q; Bu X; Chen Y
    Vision Res; 2018 Jul; 148():15-25. PubMed ID: 29763696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Intertrial priming due to distractor repetition is eliminated in homogeneous contexts.
    Feldmann-Wüstefeld T; Schubö A
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Oct; 78(7):1935-47. PubMed ID: 27165171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Top-down, bottom-up, and history-driven processing of multisensory attentional cues in intellectual disability: An experimental study in virtual reality.
    Kim J; Hwang E; Shin H; Gil YH; Lee J
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(12):e0261298. PubMed ID: 34932566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Increased influence of a previously attended feature in people with schizophrenia.
    Leonard CJ; Robinson BM; Hahn B; Gold JM; Luck SJ
    J Abnorm Psychol; 2020 Apr; 129(3):305-311. PubMed ID: 32212750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Testing a priming account of the contingent-capture effect.
    Schoeberl T; Goller F; Ansorge U
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Jul; 81(5):1262-1282. PubMed ID: 30820777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.