These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

85 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2381886)

  • 1. Breast masses. In-office evaluation with diagnostic triad.
    Hindle WH
    Postgrad Med; 1990 Aug; 88(2):85-7, 90-4. PubMed ID: 2381886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The use of fine-needle aspiration in the evaluation of persistent palpable dominant breast masses.
    Hindle WH; Payne PA; Pan EY
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Jun; 168(6 Pt 1):1814-8; discussion 1818-9. PubMed ID: 8317526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Triple approach in the diagnosis of dominant breast masses: combined physical examination, mammography, and fine-needle aspiration.
    Kaufman Z; Shpitz B; Shapiro M; Rona R; Lew S; Dinbar A
    J Surg Oncol; 1994 Aug; 56(4):254-7. PubMed ID: 8057655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of abnormal mammography results and palpable breast abnormalities.
    Kerlikowske K; Smith-Bindman R; Ljung BM; Grady D
    Ann Intern Med; 2003 Aug; 139(4):274-84. PubMed ID: 12965983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fine-needle aspiration biopsy of the breast.
    Kline TS
    Am Fam Physician; 1995 Nov; 52(7):2021-5. PubMed ID: 7484703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accuracy of mammographic appearances after breast fine-needle aspiration.
    Hindle WH; Chen EC
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Jun; 176(6):1286-90; discussion 1290-2. PubMed ID: 9215186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Diagnostic evaluation of breast nodules].
    Ciccarone M
    Minerva Ginecol; 1994 Nov; 46(11):635-42. PubMed ID: 7854568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Accuracy of combined clinical-mammographic-cytologic diagnosis of dominant breast masses. A prospective study.
    Butler JA; Vargas HI; Worthen N; Wilson SE
    Arch Surg; 1990 Jul; 125(7):893-5; discussion 896. PubMed ID: 2369314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Clinical evaluation of three methods of fine-needle aspiration, large-core needle biopsy and frozen section biopsy with focus staining for non-palpable breast disease].
    Wu YP; Cai PQ; Zhang WZ; Tang J; Gu YK; Li L; Ouyang Y; He JH; Lin HG
    Ai Zheng; 2004 Mar; 23(3):346-9. PubMed ID: 15025973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Combined fine-needle aspiration, physical examination and mammography in the diagnosis of palpable breast masses: their relation to outcome for women with primary breast cancer.
    Steinberg JL; Trudeau ME; Ryder DE; Fishell E; Chapman JA; McCready DR; Fish EB; Hiraki GY; Ross TM; Lickley LA
    Can J Surg; 1996 Aug; 39(4):302-11. PubMed ID: 8697321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Ultrasonography: an alternative to x-ray-guided needle localization of nonpalpable breast masses.
    Schwartz GF; Goldberg BB; Rifkin MD; D'Orazio SE
    Surgery; 1988 Nov; 104(5):870-3. PubMed ID: 3055396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Fine needle aspiration biopsy of the breast using ultrasound techniques--superficial localization and direct visualization.
    Harper AP
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 1988; 14 Suppl 1():5-11. PubMed ID: 3055602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The diagnostic evaluation.
    Hindle WH
    Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am; 1994 Sep; 21(3):499-517. PubMed ID: 7816410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Non palpable lesions of the breast: the Mammotome-biopsy in the preoperative management of breast cancer].
    Ceccarelli G; Casciola L; Battistini I; Stefanoni M; Spaziani A; Conti D; Di Zitti L; Valeri R; Bartoli A; Bellochi R; Rambotti M; Pisanelli MC
    G Chir; 2005 May; 26(5):187-93. PubMed ID: 16184700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of common breast masses.
    Bland KI; Love N
    Postgrad Med; 1992 Oct; 92(5):95-7, 101-2, 105-7 passim. PubMed ID: 1409186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mammographically guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions. Can it replace open biopsy?
    Layfield LJ; Parkinson B; Wong J; Giuliano AE; Bassett LW
    Cancer; 1991 Nov; 68(9):2007-11. PubMed ID: 1913550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Negative findings on fine-needle aspiration biopsy of solid breast masses: patient management.
    Painter RW; Clark WE; Deckers PJ
    Am J Surg; 1988 Mar; 155(3):387-90. PubMed ID: 3344899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Breast cysts and solid lesions: the role of fine-needle aspiration.
    Drukker BH
    Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Dec; 6(6):492-4. PubMed ID: 7893951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The status of mammographically guided fine needle aspiration biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions.
    Jackson VP
    Radiol Clin North Am; 1992 Jan; 30(1):155-66. PubMed ID: 1732924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The use of fine-needle aspiration cytology and core biopsy in the assessment of highly suspicious mammographic microcalcifications: analysis of outcome for 182 lesions detected in the setting of a population-based breast cancer screening program.
    Farshid G; Rush G
    Cancer; 2003 Dec; 99(6):357-64. PubMed ID: 14681944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.