These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23818878)

  • 1. Agency matters! Social preferences in the three-person ultimatum game.
    Alexopoulos J; Pfabigan DM; Göschl F; Bauer H; Fischmeister FP
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2013; 7():312. PubMed ID: 23818878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Do we care about the powerless third? An ERP study of the three-person ultimatum game.
    Alexopoulos J; Pfabigan DM; Lamm C; Bauer H; Fischmeister FP
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2012; 6():59. PubMed ID: 22470328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Medial frontal negativity reflects advantageous inequality aversion of proposers in the ultimatum game: An ERP study.
    Wang G; Li J; Li Z; Wei M; Li S
    Brain Res; 2016 May; 1639():38-46. PubMed ID: 26930614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Beauty matters: social preferences in a three-person ultimatum game.
    Ma Q; Hu Y
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(5):e0125806. PubMed ID: 25951138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. You are excusable! Neural correlates of economic neediness on empathic concern and fairness perception.
    Wang A; Zhu L; Lyu D; Cai D; Ma Q; Jin J
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2022 Feb; 22(1):99-111. PubMed ID: 34374029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Taking it easy when playing ultimatum game with a Down syndrome proposer: Effects on behavior and medial frontal negativity.
    Rêgo GG; Campanhã C; do Egito JHT; Boggio PS
    Soc Neurosci; 2017 Oct; 12(5):530-540. PubMed ID: 27237685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fairness concerns predict medial frontal negativity amplitude in ultimatum bargaining.
    Boksem MA; De Cremer D
    Soc Neurosci; 2010; 5(1):118-28. PubMed ID: 19851940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Electrophysiological Markers of Fairness and Selfishness Revealed by a Combination of Dictator and Ultimatum Games.
    Miraghaie AM; Pouretemad H; Villa AEP; Mazaheri MA; Khosrowabadi R; Lintas A
    Front Syst Neurosci; 2022; 16():765720. PubMed ID: 35615426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evolution of fairness in the not quite ultimatum game.
    Ichinose G; Sayama H
    Sci Rep; 2014 May; 4():5104. PubMed ID: 24869922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Social preferences trump emotions in human responses to unfair offers.
    Buskens V; Kovacic I; Rutterkamp E; van de Rijt A; Terburg D
    Sci Rep; 2023 Jun; 13(1):9602. PubMed ID: 37311882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Is it all about the self? The effect of self-control depletion on ultimatum game proposers.
    Halali E; Bereby-Meyer Y; Ockenfels A
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2013; 7():240. PubMed ID: 23781182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Adult-like neuroelectrical response to inequity in children: Evidence from the ultimatum game.
    Rêgo GG; Campanhã C; Kassab AP; Romero RL; Minati L; Boggio PS
    Soc Neurosci; 2016; 11(2):193-206. PubMed ID: 26079157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Behavioral and electrophysiological responses to fairness norm violations in antisocial offenders.
    Mayer SV; Rauss K; Pourtois G; Jusyte A; Schönenberg M
    Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci; 2019 Sep; 269(6):731-740. PubMed ID: 29397410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The undermining effect of facial attractiveness on brain responses to fairness in the Ultimatum Game: an ERP study.
    Ma Q; Hu Y; Jiang S; Meng L
    Front Neurosci; 2015; 9():77. PubMed ID: 25805967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. I'll make you an offer you can refuse: How socially sensitive is the MFN?
    Spapé MM; Dundas K
    Soc Neurosci; 2020 Feb; 15(1):123-127. PubMed ID: 31617454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Social Comparison Affects Brain Responses to Fairness in Asset Division: An ERP Study with the Ultimatum Game.
    Wu Y; Zhou Y; van Dijk E; Leliveld MC; Zhou X
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2011; 5():131. PubMed ID: 22087088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Social value orientation modulates fairness processing during social decision-making: evidence from behavior and brain potentials.
    Hu X; Mai X
    Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2021 Jul; 16(7):670-682. PubMed ID: 33769539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Social exclusion modulates fairness consideration in the ultimatum game: an ERP study.
    Qu C; Wang Y; Huang Y
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2013; 7():505. PubMed ID: 23986686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influences of State and Trait Affect on Behavior, Feedback-Related Negativity, and P3b in the Ultimatum Game.
    Riepl K; Mussel P; Osinsky R; Hewig J
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(1):e0146358. PubMed ID: 26742103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Shall I Show My Emotions? The Effects of Facial Expressions in the Ultimatum Game.
    Ferracci S; Giuliani F; Brancucci A; Pietroni D
    Behav Sci (Basel); 2021 Dec; 12(1):. PubMed ID: 35049619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.