These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

92 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23819616)

  • 1. Development of a subjective loudness rating scale.
    Williams W; Beach EF; Gilliver M
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Sep; 52(9):650-3. PubMed ID: 23819616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The objective-subjective assessment of noise: young adults can estimate loudness of events and lifestyle noise.
    Beach EF; Williams W; Gilliver M
    Int J Audiol; 2012 Jun; 51(6):444-9. PubMed ID: 22380619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Relation between loudness in categorical units and loudness in phons and sones.
    Heeren W; Hohmann V; Appell JE; Verhey JL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Apr; 133(4):EL314-9. PubMed ID: 23556697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of annoyance from low frequency noise under laboratory conditions.
    Pawlaczyk-Luszczynska M; Dudarewicz A; Szymczak W; Sliwinska-Kowalska M
    Noise Health; 2010; 12(48):166-81. PubMed ID: 20603573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Differences in subjective loudness and annoyance depending on the road traffic noise spectrum.
    Torija AJ; Flindell IH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Jan; 135(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 24437739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Analysis of the soundscape in an intensive care unit based on the annotation of an audio recording.
    Park M; Kohlrausch A; de Bruijn W; de Jager P; Simons K
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Apr; 135(4):1875-86. PubMed ID: 25234986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Self-report and long-term field measures of MP3 player use: how accurate is self-report?
    Portnuff CD; Fligor BJ; Arehart KH
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Feb; 52 Suppl 1():S33-40. PubMed ID: 23373741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Acoustical and perceptual assessment of water sounds and their use over road traffic noise.
    Galbrun L; Ali TT
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Jan; 133(1):227-37. PubMed ID: 23297897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of a wearer's voice on noise dosimeter measurements.
    Ryherd S; Kleiner M; Waye KP; Ryherd EE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Feb; 131(2):1183-93. PubMed ID: 22352493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Real-time multiband dynamic compression and noise reduction for binaural hearing aids.
    Kollmeier B; Peissig J; Hohmann V
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1993; 30(1):82-94. PubMed ID: 8263832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Detection of shouted speech in noise: human and machine.
    Pohjalainen J; Raitio T; Yrttiaho S; Alku P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Apr; 133(4):2377-89. PubMed ID: 23556603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Disentangling preference ratings of concert hall acoustics using subjective sensory profiles.
    Lokki T; Pätynen J; Kuusinen A; Tervo S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Nov; 132(5):3148-61. PubMed ID: 23145600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Subjective and objective personal noise exposure and hypertension: an epidemiologic approach.
    Weinmann T; Ehrenstein V; von Kries R; Nowak D; Radon K
    Int Arch Occup Environ Health; 2012 May; 85(4):363-71. PubMed ID: 21761214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Measurement of personal noise exposure in a cold rolling mill].
    Chai DL; Lü JQ; Zeng L; Su YG; Lei Z; Zhao YM
    Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2006 Mar; 40(2):93-6. PubMed ID: 16640904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [The loudness and hazard of noise; phenomenology, measurement, and evaluation].
    Denisov EI; Prokopenko LV; Stepanian IV; Chesalin PV
    Gig Sanit; 2009; (5):26-8. PubMed ID: 20050060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. On the perception of speech in primary school classrooms: ranking of noise interference and of age influence.
    Prodi N; Visentin C; Feletti A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Jan; 133(1):255-68. PubMed ID: 23297900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Practical ranges of loudness levels of various types of environmental noise, including traffic noise, aircraft noise, and industrial noise.
    Salomons EM; Janssen SA
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2011 Jun; 8(6):1847-64. PubMed ID: 21776205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The relationship of locus of control, self-control, and acceptable noise levels for young listeners with normal hearing.
    Nichols AC; Gordon-Hickey S
    Int J Audiol; 2012 Apr; 51(4):353-9. PubMed ID: 22229761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Investigating multidimensional characteristics of noise signals with tones from building mechanical systems and their effects on annoyance.
    Lee J; Wang LM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2020 Jan; 147(1):108. PubMed ID: 32006968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of background noise levels on community annoyance from aircraft noise.
    Lim C; Kim J; Hong J; Lee S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Feb; 123(2):766-71. PubMed ID: 18247881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.