213 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23819991)
1. Test-retest reliability of four computerized neurocognitive assessment tools in an active duty military population.
Cole WR; Arrieux JP; Schwab K; Ivins BJ; Qashu FM; Lewis SC
Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2013 Nov; 28(7):732-42. PubMed ID: 23819991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A Comparison of Four Computerized Neurocognitive Assessment Tools to a Traditional Neuropsychological Test Battery in Service Members with and without Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.
Cole WR; Arrieux JP; Ivins BJ; Schwab KA; Qashu FM
Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2018 Feb; 33(1):102-119. PubMed ID: 28444123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The impact of administration order in studies of computerized neurocognitive assessment tools (NCATs).
Cole WR; Arrieux JP; Dennison EM; Ivins BJ
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2017 Feb; 39(1):35-45. PubMed ID: 27690742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Test-Retest Reliability of a Computerized Concussion Test: CNS Vital Signs.
Littleton AC; Register-Mihalik JK; Guskiewicz KM
Sports Health; 2015; 7(5):443-7. PubMed ID: 26502421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The influence of validity criteria on Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing (ImPACT) test-retest reliability among high school athletes.
Brett BL; Solomon GS
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2017 Apr; 39(3):286-295. PubMed ID: 27585635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Examination of the Test-Retest Reliability of a Computerized Neurocognitive Test Battery.
Nakayama Y; Covassin T; Schatz P; Nogle S; Kovan J
Am J Sports Med; 2014 Aug; 42(8):2000-5. PubMed ID: 24907286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Neurocognitive Assessment Tools for Military Personnel With Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: Scoping Literature Review.
Jones C; Harasym J; Miguel-Cruz A; Chisholm S; Smith-MacDonald L; Brémault-Phillips S
JMIR Ment Health; 2021 Feb; 8(2):e26360. PubMed ID: 33616538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The test-retest reliability of three computerized neurocognitive tests used in the assessment of sport concussion.
Resch JE; Schneider MW; Munro Cullum C
Int J Psychophysiol; 2018 Oct; 132(Pt A):31-38. PubMed ID: 28935224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. One-year test-retest reliability of the online version of ImPACT in high school athletes.
Elbin RJ; Schatz P; Covassin T
Am J Sports Med; 2011 Nov; 39(11):2319-24. PubMed ID: 21841066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Retest reliability in adolescents of a computerized neuropsychological battery used to assess recovery from concussion.
Segalowitz SJ; Mahaney P; Santesso DL; MacGregor L; Dywan J; Willer B
NeuroRehabilitation; 2007; 22(3):243-51. PubMed ID: 17917174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Performance validity test and neuropsychological assessment battery screening module performances in an active-duty sample with a history of concussion.
Grills CE; Armistead-Jehle P
Appl Neuropsychol Adult; 2016; 23(4):295-301. PubMed ID: 26943837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Day of injury cognitive performance on the Military Acute Concussion Evaluation (MACE) by U.S. military service members in OEF/OIF.
McCrea M; Guskiewicz K; Doncevic S; Helmick K; Kennedy J; Boyd C; Asmussen S; Ahn KW; Wang Y; Hoelzle J; Jaffee M
Mil Med; 2014 Sep; 179(9):990-7. PubMed ID: 25181717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The role of performance validity tests in the assessment of cognitive functioning after military concussion: A replication and extension.
Armistead-Jehle P; Cooper DB; Vanderploeg RD
Appl Neuropsychol Adult; 2016; 23(4):264-73. PubMed ID: 26569384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Immediate Post-concussion and Cognitive Testing: Ceiling Effects, Reliability, and Implications for Interpretation.
Gaudet CE; Konin J; Faust D
Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2021 May; 36(4):561-569. PubMed ID: 32978632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Test-retest reliability of computerized concussion assessment programs.
Broglio SP; Ferrara MS; Macciocchi SN; Baumgartner TA; Elliott R
J Athl Train; 2007; 42(4):509-14. PubMed ID: 18174939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical Use of the Automated Neuropsychological Assessment Metrics TBI-Mil Expanded Battery in Evaluating Concussion Recovery: A Retrospective Study.
Porter SJ; Johnson DE
Mil Med; 2020 Sep; 185(9-10):e1722-e1727. PubMed ID: 32495844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Multiple Past Concussions Are Associated with Ongoing Post-Concussive Symptoms but Not Cognitive Impairment in Active-Duty Army Soldiers.
Dretsch MN; Silverberg ND; Iverson GL
J Neurotrauma; 2015 Sep; 32(17):1301-6. PubMed ID: 25763565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A two-factor theory for concussion assessment using ImPACT: memory and speed.
Schatz P; Maerlender A
Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2013 Dec; 28(8):791-7. PubMed ID: 24123401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reliability of Computerized Neurocognitive Tests for Concussion Assessment: A Meta-Analysis.
Farnsworth JL; Dargo L; Ragan BG; Kang M
J Athl Train; 2017 Sep; 52(9):826-833. PubMed ID: 28771032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of the Military Acute Concussion Evaluation for use in combat operations more than 12 hours after injury.
Coldren RL; Kelly MP; Parish RV; Dretsch M; Russell ML
Mil Med; 2010 Jul; 175(7):477-81. PubMed ID: 20684450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
