These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23820024)
41. Unconscious adaptation: a new illusion of depth induced by stimulus features without depth. Hayashi R; Miyawaki Y; Maeda T; Tachi S Vision Res; 2003 Dec; 43(26):2773-82. PubMed ID: 14568094 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. New phenomena linking depth and luminance in stereoscopic motion. Chang JJ Vision Res; 1990; 30(1):137-47. PubMed ID: 2321359 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Coexistence of binocular integration and suppression determined by surface border information. Su Y; He ZJ; Ooi TL Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2009 Sep; 106(37):15990-5. PubMed ID: 19805239 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. The effect of stimulus contrast and interocular correlation on disparity vergence. Stevenson SB; Cormack LK; Schor CM Vision Res; 1994 Feb; 34(3):383-96. PubMed ID: 8160374 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Interocular correlation sensitivity and its relationship with stereopsis. Reynaud A; Hess RF J Vis; 2018 Jan; 18(1):11. PubMed ID: 29362804 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Binocular interaction: contrast matching and contrast discrimination are predicted by the same model. Baker DH; Meese TS; Georgeson MA Spat Vis; 2007; 20(5):397-413. PubMed ID: 17716525 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Evidence for speed sensitivity to motion in depth from binocular cues. Wardle SG; Alais D J Vis; 2013 Jan; 13(1):. PubMed ID: 23308025 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Effects of head motion and stereo viewing on perceived glossiness. Sakano Y; Ando H J Vis; 2010 Nov; 10(9):15. PubMed ID: 21106677 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. A psychophysical and computational analysis of intensity-based stereo. Mallot HA; Arndt PA; Bülthoff HH Biol Cybern; 1996 Sep; 75(3):187-98. PubMed ID: 8974467 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Grasping deficits and adaptations in adults with stereo vision losses. Melmoth DR; Finlay AL; Morgan MJ; Grant S Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2009 Aug; 50(8):3711-20. PubMed ID: 19339741 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Stereopsis and contrast. Legge GE; Gu YC Vision Res; 1989; 29(8):989-1004. PubMed ID: 2629214 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Recovery of stereopsis through perceptual learning in human adults with abnormal binocular vision. Ding J; Levi DM Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2011 Sep; 108(37):E733-41. PubMed ID: 21896742 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Size-disparity correlation in human binocular depth perception. Prince SJ; Eagle RA Proc Biol Sci; 1999 Jul; 266(1426):1361-5. PubMed ID: 10445290 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Thresholds for sine-wave corrugations defined by binocular disparity in random dot stereograms: Factor analysis of individual differences reveals two stereoscopic mechanisms tuned for spatial frequency. Peterzell DH; Serrano-Pedraza I; Widdall M; Read JCA Vision Res; 2017 Dec; 141():127-135. PubMed ID: 29155009 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. [Binocular functional exploration: fundamental aspects and analysis by the Fusio-Test]. Bourdy C; Cottin F; James Y J Fr Ophtalmol; 1988; 11(5):441-51. PubMed ID: 3057057 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Ordinal configural cues combine with metric disparity in depth perception. Burge J; Peterson MA; Palmer SE J Vis; 2005 Jun; 5(6):534-42. PubMed ID: 16097866 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. The perceived visual direction of monocular objects in random-dot stereograms is influenced by perceived depth and allelotropia. Hariharan-Vilupuru S; Bedell HE Vision Res; 2009 Jan; 49(2):190-201. PubMed ID: 18992271 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Simultaneous density contrast and binocular integration. Sun HC; Baker CL; Kingdom FAA J Vis; 2018 Jun; 18(6):3. PubMed ID: 30029213 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]