309 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23821356)
1. An ipsilateral comparison of acceleromyography and electromyography during recovery from nondepolarizing neuromuscular block under general anesthesia in humans.
Liang SS; Stewart PA; Phillips S
Anesth Analg; 2013 Aug; 117(2):373-9. PubMed ID: 23821356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of kinemyography and electromyography during spontaneous recovery from non-depolarising neuromuscular blockade.
Khandkar C; Liang S; Phillips S; Lee CY; Stewart PA
Anaesth Intensive Care; 2016 Nov; 44(6):745-751. PubMed ID: 27832563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Ipsilateral and Simultaneous Comparison of Responses from Acceleromyography- and Electromyography-based Neuromuscular Monitors.
Nemes R; Lengyel S; Nagy G; Hampton DR; Gray M; Renew JR; Tassonyi E; Fülesdi B; Brull SJ
Anesthesiology; 2021 Oct; 135(4):597-611. PubMed ID: 34329371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Acceleromyography improves detection of residual neuromuscular blockade in children.
Ansermino JM; Sanderson PM; Bevan JC; Bevan DR
Can J Anaesth; 1996 Jun; 43(6):589-94. PubMed ID: 8773866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Bias, limits of agreement, and percent errors between acceleromyography and mechanomyography in anesthetized dogs.
Sakai DM; Romano M; Tseng CT; Flanders A; Martin-Flores M
Vet J; 2018 Mar; 233():3-7. PubMed ID: 29486876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Monitoring of neuromuscular transmission by electromyography during anaesthesia. A comparison with mechanomyography in cat and man.
Engbaek J
Dan Med Bull; 1996 Sep; 43(4):301-16. PubMed ID: 8884132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effect of preload on electromyographic train-of-four ratio at the first dorsal interosseous muscle during spontaneous recovery from neuromuscular blockade.
Bansal A; Stewart PA; Phillips S; Liang S; Wang X
Anaesth Intensive Care; 2018 Nov; 46(6):614-619. PubMed ID: 30447672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Normalization of acceleromyographic train-of-four ratio by baseline value for detecting residual neuromuscular block.
Suzuki T; Fukano N; Kitajima O; Saeki S; Ogawa S
Br J Anaesth; 2006 Jan; 96(1):44-7. PubMed ID: 16299046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Acceleromyography vs. electromyography: an ipsilateral comparison of the indirectly evoked neuromuscular response to train-of-four stimulation.
Kopman AF; Chin W; Cyriac J
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2005 Mar; 49(3):316-22. PubMed ID: 15752395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of electromyography and kinemyography during recovery from non-depolarising neuromuscular blockade.
Stewart PA; Freelander N; Liang S; Heller G; Phillips S
Anaesth Intensive Care; 2014 May; 42(3):378-84. PubMed ID: 24794479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Performance of a new auxiliary device based on wrist brace to improve accuracy and feasibility in neuromuscular monitoring with acceleromyography in prone-positioned patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery: a prospective randomized clinical trial.
Oh SK; Lim BG; Kim H; Lee JH; Lee JE
J Clin Monit Comput; 2023 Aug; 37(4):993-1001. PubMed ID: 37004664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Arm-to-arm variation when evaluating neuromuscular block: an analysis of the precision and the bias and agreement between arms when using mechanomyography or acceleromyography.
Claudius C; Skovgaard LT; Viby-Mogensen J
Br J Anaesth; 2010 Sep; 105(3):310-7. PubMed ID: 20595196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Monitoring recovery from rocuronium-induced neuromuscular block using acceleromyography at the trapezius versus the adductor pollicis muscle: an observational trial.
Soltesz S; Stark C; Noé KG; Anapolski M; Mencke T
Can J Anaesth; 2016 Jun; 63(6):709-17. PubMed ID: 26864194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Performance of acceleromyography with a short and light TOF-tube compared with mechanomyography: a clinical comparison.
Dubois PE; De Bel M; Jamart J; Mitchell J; Gourdin M; Dransart C; d'Hollander A
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2014 Aug; 31(8):404-10. PubMed ID: 23884404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparison of accelerometric monitoring by TOF Watch® SX and electromyographic monitoring by Tetragraph® for recovery from neuromuscular blockade.
Giudici G; Piccioni F; Proto P; Valenza F
J Clin Anesth; 2021 Dec; 75():110481. PubMed ID: 34388509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of a three-axial acceleromyography monitor in dogs compared with mechanomyography.
Tseng CT; Sakai DM; Lorenzutti AM; Martin-Flores M
Vet Anaesth Analg; 2023 Sep; 50(5):408-414. PubMed ID: 37500406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparative Study of TOF-Cuff, a New Neuromuscular Blockade Monitor, and TOF-Watch, an Acceleromyography.
Kazuma S; Wakasugi K; Hagiwara H; Yamakage M
Anesth Analg; 2019 Jul; 129(1):e16-e19. PubMed ID: 30925563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reversal with sugammadex in the absence of monitoring did not preclude residual neuromuscular block.
Kotake Y; Ochiai R; Suzuki T; Ogawa S; Takagi S; Ozaki M; Nakatsuka I; Takeda J
Anesth Analg; 2013 Aug; 117(2):345-51. PubMed ID: 23757472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of the TOFscan and the TOF-Watch SX during Recovery of Neuromuscular Function.
Murphy GS; Szokol JW; Avram MJ; Greenberg SB; Shear TD; Deshur M; Benson J; Newmark RL; Maher CE
Anesthesiology; 2018 Nov; 129(5):880-888. PubMed ID: 30130260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. New equipment for neuromuscular transmission monitoring: a comparison of the TOF-Guard with the Myograph 2000.
Kirkegaard-Nielsen H; Helbo-Hansen HS; Lindholm P; Pedersen HS; Severinsen IK; Schmidt MB
J Clin Monit Comput; 1998 Jan; 14(1):19-27. PubMed ID: 9641852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
