179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23822196)
1. Secondary stability of microthickness hydroxyapatite-coated dental implants installed without primary stability in dogs.
Jung UW; Kim S; Lee IK; Kim MS; Lee JS; Kim HJ
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Oct; 25(10):1169-74. PubMed ID: 23822196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Experimental study of bone response to hydroxyapatite coating implants: bone-implant contact and removal torque test.
Eom TG; Jeon GR; Jeong CM; Kim YK; Kim SG; Cho IH; Cho YS; Oh JS
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2012 Oct; 114(4):411-8. PubMed ID: 22749706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. In vivo evaluation of bioactive glass-based coatings on dental implants in a dog implantation model.
van Oirschot BA; Alghamdi HS; Närhi TO; Anil S; Al Farraj Aldosari A; van den Beucken JJ; Jansen JA
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Jan; 25(1):21-8. PubMed ID: 23078340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effects of guided bone regeneration and grafting on implants placed into immediate extraction sockets. An experimental study in dogs.
Kohal RJ; Mellas P; Hürzeler MB; Trejo PM; Morrison E; Caffesse RG
J Periodontol; 1998 Aug; 69(8):927-37. PubMed ID: 9736376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Histomorphometric and fluorescence microscopic evaluation of interfacial bone healing around 3 different dental implants before and after radiation therapy.
Weinlaender M; Beumer J; Kenney EB; Lekovic V; Holmes R; Moy PK; Plenk H
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(2):212-24. PubMed ID: 16634491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effect of chemical and nanotopographical modifications on the early stages of osseointegration.
Meirelles L; Currie F; Jacobsson M; Albrektsson T; Wennerberg A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(4):641-7. PubMed ID: 18807559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of guided bone regeneration around commercially pure titanium and hydroxyapatite-coated dental implants. II. Histologic analysis.
Stentz WC; Mealey BL; Gunsolley JC; Waldrop TC
J Periodontol; 1997 Oct; 68(10):933-49. PubMed ID: 9358360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Stability of loaded and unloaded implants with different surfaces.
Nergiz I; Arpak N; Bostanci H; Scorziello TM; Schmage P
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(2):289-98. PubMed ID: 19492645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of different surface modifications for titanium implants installed into the goat iliac crest.
van Oirschot BA; Meijer GJ; Bronkhorst EM; Närhi T; Jansen JA; van den Beucken JJ
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2016 Feb; 27(2):e57-67. PubMed ID: 25486997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reosseointegration of mechanically disintegrated implants in dogs: mechanical and histometric analyses.
Kim S; Lee JS; Hwang JW; Kim MS; Choi SH; Jung UW
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Jun; 25(6):729-34. PubMed ID: 23432703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Hot isostatic pressing-processed hydroxyapatite-coated titanium implants: light microscopic and scanning electron microscopy investigations.
Wie H; Herø H; Solheim T
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(6):837-44. PubMed ID: 9857595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Osseointegration of dental implants installed without mechanical engagement: a histometric analysis in dogs.
Jung UW; Kim S; Kim YH; Cha JK; Lee IS; Choi SH
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Nov; 23(11):1297-301. PubMed ID: 22092341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effects of ion beam-assisted deposition of hydroxyapatite on the grit-blasted surface of endosseous implants in rabbit tibiae.
Park YS; Yi KY; Lee IS; Han CH; Jung YC
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2005; 20(1):31-8. PubMed ID: 15747671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Histologic and histomorphometric comparison of immediately placed hydroxyapatite-coated and titanium plasma-sprayed implants: a pilot study in dogs.
Karabuda C; Sandalli P; Yalcin S; Steflik DE; Parr GR
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1999; 14(4):510-5. PubMed ID: 10453665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The experimental research on two-generation BLB dental implants - part I: surface modification and osseointegration.
Yin K; Wang Z; Fan X; Bian Y; Guo J; Lan J
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Jul; 23(7):846-52. PubMed ID: 21564304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of magnesium-substituted nanohydroxyapatite coating on implant osseointegration.
Zhao SF; Jiang QH; Peel S; Wang XX; He FM
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Aug; 24 Suppl A100():34-41. PubMed ID: 22145854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Biological performance of chemical hydroxyapatite coating associated with implant surface modification by laser beam: biomechanical study in rabbit tibias.
Faeda RS; Tavares HS; Sartori R; Guastaldi AC; Marcantonio E
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Aug; 67(8):1706-15. PubMed ID: 19615586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Hydroxyapatite and collagen combination-coated dental implants display better bone formation in the peri-implant area than the same combination plus bone morphogenetic protein-2-coated implants, hydroxyapatite only coated implants, and uncoated implants.
Lee SW; Hahn BD; Kang TY; Lee MJ; Choi JY; Kim MK; Kim SG
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Jan; 72(1):53-60. PubMed ID: 24331565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Biomimetic calcium phosphate composite coating of dental implants.
Schliephake H; Scharnweber D; Roesseler S; Dard M; Sewing A; Aref A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(5):738-46. PubMed ID: 17066635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Biomechanical and morphometric analysis of hydroxyapatite-coated implants with varying crystallinity.
Chang YL; Lew D; Park JB; Keller JC
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1999 Sep; 57(9):1096-108; discussion 1108-9. PubMed ID: 10484111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
