274 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23822408)
1. Automated generation of IMRT treatment plans for prostate cancer patients with metal hip prostheses: comparison of different planning strategies.
Voet PW; Dirkx ML; Breedveld S; Heijmen BJ
Med Phys; 2013 Jul; 40(7):071704. PubMed ID: 23822408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. On the beam direction search space in computerized non-coplanar beam angle optimization for IMRT-prostate SBRT.
Rossi L; Breedveld S; Heijmen BJ; Voet PW; Lanconelli N; Aluwini S
Phys Med Biol; 2012 Sep; 57(17):5441-58. PubMed ID: 22864234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Integrated multicriterial optimization of beam angles and intensity profiles for coplanar and noncoplanar head and neck IMRT and implications for VMAT.
Voet PW; Breedveld S; Dirkx ML; Levendag PC; Heijmen BJ
Med Phys; 2012 Aug; 39(8):4858-65. PubMed ID: 22894412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. iCycle: Integrated, multicriterial beam angle, and profile optimization for generation of coplanar and noncoplanar IMRT plans.
Breedveld S; Storchi PR; Voet PW; Heijmen BJ
Med Phys; 2012 Feb; 39(2):951-63. PubMed ID: 22320804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A derivative-free multistart framework for an automated noncoplanar beam angle optimization in IMRT.
Rocha H; Dias J; Ventura T; Ferreira B; Lopes MD
Med Phys; 2016 Oct; 43(10):5514. PubMed ID: 27782716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy for pancreatic and prostate cancer using pulsed low-dose rate delivery techniques.
Li J; Lang J; Wang P; Kang S; Lin MH; Chen X; Chen F; Guo M; Chen L; Ma CM
Med Dosim; 2014; 39(4):330-6. PubMed ID: 25087084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy with noncoplanar beams for treatment of prostate cancer in patients with bilateral hip prosthesis-a case study.
Brooks C; Cheung RM; Kudchadker RJ
Med Dosim; 2010; 35(2):87-91. PubMed ID: 19931019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dosimetric study of uniform scanning proton therapy planning for prostate cancer patients with a metal hip prosthesis, and comparison with volumetric-modulated arc therapy.
Rana S; Cheng C; Zheng Y; Hsi W; Zeidan O; Schreuder N; Vargas C; Larson G
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2014 May; 15(3):4611. PubMed ID: 24892333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Characteristics of non-coplanar IMRT in the presence of target-embedded organs at risk.
Bratengeier K; Holubyev K
Radiat Oncol; 2015 Oct; 10():207. PubMed ID: 26458947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A case study of radiotherapy planning for a bilateral metal hip prosthesis prostate cancer patient.
Su A; Reft C; Rash C; Price J; Jani AB
Med Dosim; 2005; 30(3):169-75. PubMed ID: 16112469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of beam angle selection strategies for intracranial IMRT.
Bangert M; Ziegenhein P; Oelfke U
Med Phys; 2013 Jan; 40(1):011716. PubMed ID: 23298086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Toward fully automated multicriterial plan generation: a prospective clinical study.
Voet PW; Dirkx ML; Breedveld S; Fransen D; Levendag PC; Heijmen BJ
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2013 Mar; 85(3):866-72. PubMed ID: 22658513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Improving intensity-modulated radiation therapy using the anatomic beam orientation optimization algorithm.
Potrebko PS; McCurdy BM; Butler JB; El-Gubtan AS
Med Phys; 2008 May; 35(5):2170-9. PubMed ID: 18561692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An overlap-volume-histogram based method for rectal dose prediction and automated treatment planning in the external beam prostate radiotherapy following hydrogel injection.
Yang Y; Ford EC; Wu B; Pinkawa M; van Triest B; Campbell P; Song DY; McNutt TR
Med Phys; 2013 Jan; 40(1):011709. PubMed ID: 23298079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Simultaneous beam geometry and intensity map optimization in intensity-modulated radiation therapy.
Lee EK; Fox T; Crocker I
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2006 Jan; 64(1):301-20. PubMed ID: 16289912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comprehensive comparison of IMRT and VMAT plan quality for prostate cancer treatment.
Quan EM; Li X; Li Y; Wang X; Kudchadker RJ; Johnson JL; Kuban DA; Lee AK; Zhang X
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2012 Jul; 83(4):1169-78. PubMed ID: 22704703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Towards automated on-line adaptation of 2-Step IMRT plans: QUASIMODO phantom and prostate cancer cases.
Holubyev K; Bratengeier K; Gainey M; Polat B; Flentje M
Radiat Oncol; 2013 Nov; 8():263. PubMed ID: 24207129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Automated non-coplanar beam direction optimization improves IMRT in SBRT of liver metastasis.
de Pooter JA; Méndez Romero A; Wunderink W; Storchi PR; Heijmen BJ
Radiother Oncol; 2008 Sep; 88(3):376-81. PubMed ID: 18585809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Complementing Prostate SBRT VMAT With a Two-Beam Non-Coplanar IMRT Class Solution to Enhance Rectum and Bladder Sparing With Minimum Increase in Treatment Time.
Sharfo AWM; Rossi L; Dirkx MLP; Breedveld S; Aluwini S; Heijmen BJM
Front Oncol; 2021; 11():620978. PubMed ID: 33816253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Lung IMRT planning with automatic determination of beam angle configurations.
Yuan L; Zhu W; Ge Y; Jiang Y; Sheng Y; Yin FF; Wu QJ
Phys Med Biol; 2018 Jul; 63(13):135024. PubMed ID: 29846178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
