These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23822431)

  • 1. Dosimetric accuracy of proton therapy for chordoma patients with titanium implants.
    Verburg JM; Seco J
    Med Phys; 2013 Jul; 40(7):071727. PubMed ID: 23822431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accurate proton treatment planning for pencil beam crossing titanium fixation implants.
    Righetto R; Clemens LP; Lorentini S; Fracchiolla F; Algranati C; Tommasino F; Dionisi F; Cianchetti M; Schwarz M; Farace P
    Phys Med; 2020 Feb; 70():28-38. PubMed ID: 31954210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Approaches to reducing photon dose calculation errors near metal implants.
    Huang JY; Followill DS; Howell RM; Liu X; Mirkovic D; Stingo FC; Kry SF
    Med Phys; 2016 Sep; 43(9):5117. PubMed ID: 27587042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dosimetric impact of orthopedic metal artifact reduction (O-MAR) on Spine SBRT patients.
    Shen ZL; Xia P; Klahr P; Djemil T
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Sep; 16(5):106-116. PubMed ID: 26699295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The impact of low-Z and high-Z metal implants in IMRT: a Monte Carlo study of dose inaccuracies in commercial dose algorithms.
    Spadea MF; Verburg JM; Baroni G; Seco J
    Med Phys; 2014 Jan; 41(1):011702. PubMed ID: 24387494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Correction of CT artifacts and its influence on Monte Carlo dose calculations.
    Bazalova M; Beaulieu L; Palefsky S; Verhaegena F
    Med Phys; 2007 Jun; 34(6):2119-32. PubMed ID: 17654915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of two commercial CT metal artifact reduction algorithms for use in proton radiotherapy treatment planning in the head and neck area.
    Andersson KM; Dahlgren CV; Reizenstein J; Cao Y; Ahnesjö A; Thunberg P
    Med Phys; 2018 Oct; 45(10):4329-4344. PubMed ID: 30076784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical implementation of full Monte Carlo dose calculation in proton beam therapy.
    Paganetti H; Jiang H; Parodi K; Slopsema R; Engelsman M
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Sep; 53(17):4825-53. PubMed ID: 18701772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An algorithm to assess the need for clinical Monte Carlo dose calculation for small proton therapy fields based on quantification of tissue heterogeneity.
    Bueno M; Paganetti H; Duch MA; Schuemann J
    Med Phys; 2013 Aug; 40(8):081704. PubMed ID: 23927301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of Carbon Fiber and Titanium Surgical Implants for Proton and Photon Therapy.
    Depauw N; Pursley J; Lozano-Calderon SA; Patel CG
    Pract Radiat Oncol; 2023; 13(3):256-262. PubMed ID: 36738918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effects of titanium mesh on passive-scattering proton dose.
    Lin H; Ding X; Yin L; Zhai H; Liu H; Kassaee A; Hill-Kayser C; Lustig RA; McDonough J; Both S
    Phys Med Biol; 2014 May; 59(10):N81-9. PubMed ID: 24778368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Changes realized from extended bit-depth and metal artifact reduction in CT.
    Glide-Hurst C; Chen D; Zhong H; Chetty IJ
    Med Phys; 2013 Jun; 40(6):061711. PubMed ID: 23718590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A component method to delineate surgical spine implants for proton Monte Carlo dose calculation.
    Chang CW; Charyyev S; Harms J; Slopsema R; Wolf J; Refai D; Yoon T; McDonald MW; Bradley JD; Leng S; Zhou J; Yang X; Lin L
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2023 Jan; 24(1):e13800. PubMed ID: 36210177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of Hounsfield number conversion on CT based proton Monte Carlo dose calculations.
    Jiang H; Seco J; Paganetti H
    Med Phys; 2007 Apr; 34(4):1439-49. PubMed ID: 17500475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of a pencil-beam dose calculation technique for charged particle radiotherapy.
    Petti PL
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1996 Jul; 35(5):1049-57. PubMed ID: 8751415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dosimetric comparison of stopping power calibration with dual-energy CT and single-energy CT in proton therapy treatment planning.
    Zhu J; Penfold SN
    Med Phys; 2016 Jun; 43(6):2845-2854. PubMed ID: 27277033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of metal implants and a metal artifact reduction tool on calculation accuracy of AAA and Acuros XB algorithms in small fields.
    Akdeniz Y; Yegingil I; Yegingil Z
    Med Phys; 2019 Nov; 46(11):5326-5335. PubMed ID: 31508819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Metal artifacts in computed tomography for radiation therapy planning: dosimetric effects and impact of metal artifact reduction.
    Giantsoudi D; De Man B; Verburg J; Trofimov A; Jin Y; Wang G; Gjesteby L; Paganetti H
    Phys Med Biol; 2017 Apr; 62(8):R49-R80. PubMed ID: 28323641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Iterative metal artifact reduction improves dose calculation accuracy : Phantom study with dental implants.
    Maerz M; Mittermair P; Krauss A; Koelbl O; Dobler B
    Strahlenther Onkol; 2016 Jun; 192(6):403-13. PubMed ID: 26968180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Adaptive step size algorithm to increase efficiency of proton macro Monte Carlo dose calculation.
    Kueng R; Frei D; Volken W; Stuermlin F; M Stampanoni MF; Aebersold DM; Manser P; Fix MK
    Radiat Oncol; 2019 Sep; 14(1):165. PubMed ID: 31500647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.