BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23822445)

  • 21. Effects of spot size and spot spacing on lateral penumbra reduction when using a dynamic collimation system for spot scanning proton therapy.
    Hyer DE; Hill PM; Wang D; Smith BR; Flynn RT
    Phys Med Biol; 2014 Nov; 59(22):N187-96. PubMed ID: 25330783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Quality assurance of proton beams using a multilayer ionization chamber system.
    Dhanesar S; Sahoo N; Kerr M; Taylor MB; Summers P; Zhu XR; Poenisch F; Gillin M
    Med Phys; 2013 Sep; 40(9):092102. PubMed ID: 24007171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Characterization of a commercial scintillation detector for 2-D dosimetry in scanned proton and carbon ion beams.
    Russo S; Mirandola A; Molinelli S; Mastella E; Vai A; Magro G; Mairani A; Boi D; Donetti M; Ciocca M
    Phys Med; 2017 Feb; 34():48-54. PubMed ID: 28118950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Lateral dose profile characterization in scanning particle therapy.
    Bäumer C; Farr JB
    Med Phys; 2011 Jun; 38(6):2904-13. PubMed ID: 21815365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Fast IMRT with narrow high energy scanned photon beams.
    Andreassen B; Strååt SJ; Holmberg R; Näfstadius P; Brahme A
    Med Phys; 2011 Aug; 38(8):4774-84. PubMed ID: 21928650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effect of Scanning Beam for Superficial Dose in Proton Therapy.
    Moskvin VP; Estabrook NC; Cheng CW; Das IJ; Johnstone PA
    Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2015 Oct; 14(5):643-52. PubMed ID: 24945369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Evaluation and Mitigation of Secondary Dose Delivered to Electronic Systems in Proton Therapy.
    Wroe AJ
    Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2016 Feb; 15(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 25616623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Large energy acceptance gantry for proton therapy utilizing superconducting technology.
    Nesteruk KP; Calzolaio C; Meer D; Rizzoglio V; Seidel M; Schippers JM
    Phys Med Biol; 2019 Aug; 64(17):175007. PubMed ID: 31272087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Development of a golden beam data set for the commissioning of a proton double-scattering system in a pencil-beam dose calculation algorithm.
    Slopsema RL; Lin L; Flampouri S; Yeung D; Li Z; McDonough JE; Palta J
    Med Phys; 2014 Sep; 41(9):091710. PubMed ID: 25186385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Performance characterization of a 3D liquid scintillation detector for discrete spot scanning proton beam systems.
    Darne CD; Alsanea F; Robertson DG; Sahoo N; Beddar S
    Phys Med Biol; 2017 Jun; 62(14):5652-5667. PubMed ID: 28593931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Variations in proton scanned beam dose delivery due to uncertainties in magnetic beam steering.
    Peterson S; Polf J; Ciangaru G; Frank SJ; Bues M; Smith A
    Med Phys; 2009 Aug; 36(8):3693-702. PubMed ID: 19746802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Scanned Proton Beam Performance and Calibration of the Shanghai Advanced Proton Therapy Facility.
    Shu H; Yin C; Zhang H; Liu M; Zhang M; Zhao L; Chu K; Dai X; Moyers MF
    MethodsX; 2019; 6():1933-1943. PubMed ID: 31660296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Preliminary analysis for integration of spot-scanning proton beam therapy and real-time imaging and gating.
    Shimizu S; Matsuura T; Umezawa M; Hiramoto K; Miyamoto N; Umegaki K; Shirato H
    Phys Med; 2014 Jul; 30(5):555-8. PubMed ID: 24786663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparative study of layered and volumetric rescanning for different scanning speeds of proton beam in liver patients.
    Bernatowicz K; Lomax AJ; Knopf A
    Phys Med Biol; 2013 Nov; 58(22):7905-20. PubMed ID: 24165090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Technical Note: Validation of halo modeling for proton pencil beam spot scanning using a quality assurance test pattern.
    Lin L; Huang S; Kang M; Solberg TD; McDonough JE; Ainsley CG
    Med Phys; 2015 Sep; 42(9):5138-43. PubMed ID: 26328965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A fourier analysis on the maximum acceptable grid size for discrete proton beam dose calculation.
    Li HS; Romeijn HE; Dempsey JF
    Med Phys; 2006 Sep; 33(9):3508-18. PubMed ID: 17022247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effects of minimum monitor unit threshold on spot scanning proton plan quality.
    Howard M; Beltran C; Mayo CS; Herman MG
    Med Phys; 2014 Sep; 41(9):091703. PubMed ID: 25186378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. An integral quality monitoring system for real-time verification of intensity modulated radiation therapy.
    Islam MK; Norrlinger BD; Smale JR; Heaton RK; Galbraith D; Fan C; Jaffray DA
    Med Phys; 2009 Dec; 36(12):5420-8. PubMed ID: 20095254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Design of a fast multileaf collimator for radiobiological optimized IMRT with scanned beams of photons, electrons, and light ions.
    Svensson R; Larsson S; Gudowska I; Holmberg R; Brahme A
    Med Phys; 2007 Mar; 34(3):877-88. PubMed ID: 17441233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Implication of spot position error on plan quality and patient safety in pencil-beam-scanning proton therapy.
    Yu J; Beltran CJ; Herman MG
    Med Phys; 2014 Aug; 41(8):081706. PubMed ID: 25086516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.