198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23822774)
1. NICE: moving onward.
Rawlins MD
N Engl J Med; 2013 Jul; 369(1):3-5. PubMed ID: 23822774
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. NICE quality standards: improving healthcare quality in the English NHS?
Stokes T
Qual Prim Care; 2013; 21(4):207-9. PubMed ID: 24041137
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The NICE process for developing quality standards and indicators.
Bennett B; Coventry E; Greenway N; Minchin M
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2014; 108(8-9):481-6. PubMed ID: 25523846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Ethics and opportunity costs: have NICE grasped the ethics of priority setting?
McMillan J; Sheehan M; Austin D; Howell J
J Med Ethics; 2006 Mar; 32(3):127-8. PubMed ID: 16507653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. NICE work--providing guidance to the British National Health Service.
Rawlins MD
N Engl J Med; 2004 Sep; 351(14):1383-5. PubMed ID: 15459297
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. NICE prospects for best practice. National Institute for Clinical Excellence.
Gray J
Nurs Stand; 1999 Apr 7-13; 13(29):3. PubMed ID: 10358545
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. National asset.
Cresswell J
Community Nurse; 1999 Sep; 5(8):10. PubMed ID: 10732555
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Data briefing. NICE (National Institute for Clinical Excellence).
Appleby J
Health Serv J; 2000 Jun; 110(5708):32. PubMed ID: 11183800
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. NICE clinical guidelines: maybe health economists should participate in guideline development.
Littlejohns P; Leng G; Culyer T; Drummond M;
BMJ; 2004 Sep; 329(7465):571; author reply 572. PubMed ID: 15345640
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Can NICE guidance be given more clout?
Mayor S
BMJ; 2006 Jul; 333(7560):170. PubMed ID: 16858045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Is NICE delivering the goods?
Freemantle N
BMJ; 2004 Oct; 329(7473):1003-4. PubMed ID: 15514343
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Legal considerations of clinical guidelines: will NICE make a difference?
Samanta A; Samanta J; Gunn M
J R Soc Med; 2003 Mar; 96(3):133-8. PubMed ID: 12612117
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The next phase of the Care Quality Commission.
Glasper A
Br J Nurs; 2013 Jan 24-Feb 13; 22(2):114-5. PubMed ID: 23587897
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Bring back the SAC.
Wilkins D
BMJ; 2009 Jun; 338():b2328. PubMed ID: 19509039
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Regulation. A pause for thought.
Moore A
Health Serv J; 2011 Oct; 121(6278):23-4. PubMed ID: 22175115
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. A nice try.
Munro R
Nurs Times; 1999 Aug 18-24; 95(33):14-5. PubMed ID: 10614400
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. NICE: a nightmare worth having?
Drummond M
Health Econ Policy Law; 2007 Apr; 2(Pt 2):203-8; discussion 217-21. PubMed ID: 18634663
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Must try harder.
Smith P
Health Serv J; 2003 Nov; 113(5883):10-1. PubMed ID: 14671857
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. From evidence to guidance.
Ullman R; Hughes R
Community Pract; 2010 Dec; 83(12):18. PubMed ID: 21214132
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. A response to Birch and Gafni--some reasons to be cheerful about NICE.
Gold M; Bryan S
Health Econ Policy Law; 2007 Apr; 2(Pt 2):209-16; discussion 217-21. PubMed ID: 18634664
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
