146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23823347)
1. Analysis of total microbiota in dentin after mechanical or papain-based chemomechanical caries removal.
de Almeida SM; Franca FM; Florio FM; Ambrosano GM; Basting RT
Gen Dent; 2013 Jul; 61(4):59-63. PubMed ID: 23823347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Bromelain vs Papain Gel for Caries Removal in Primary Teeth.
Reddy VK; Nagar P; Reddy S; Ragulakollu R; Tirupathi SP; Ravi R; Purumadla U
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2019 Nov; 20(11):1345-1349. PubMed ID: 31892689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Chemical, morphological and microhardness changes of dentine after chemomechanical caries removal.
Hamama HH; Yiu CK; Burrow MF; King NM
Aust Dent J; 2013 Sep; 58(3):283-92. PubMed ID: 23981208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Microbiological analysis after complete or partial removal of carious dentin in primary teeth: a randomized clinical trial.
Lula EC; Monteiro-Neto V; Alves CM; Ribeiro CC
Caries Res; 2009; 43(5):354-8. PubMed ID: 19648746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Antibacterial Activity of Two Chemomechanical Caries Removal Gels on Carious Dentin of Primary Teeth: An in vitro Study.
Gulzar S; Arora R; Shah AH; Bhardwaj B; Abusalim G; Khalil HS; Wyne AH
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 Dec; 17(12):1027-1032. PubMed ID: 27965492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Volumetric analysis after caries excavation with caries detecting dyes and chemomechanical caries removal agents using 3D scanner-a randomised clinical trial.
Bastia R; Govind S; Assiry AA; Alessa NA; Kader MA; Adil AH; Karobari MI
BMC Oral Health; 2024 Feb; 24(1):164. PubMed ID: 38302932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Chemomechanical versus drilling methods for caries removal: an in vitro study.
Kitsahawong K; Seminario AL; Pungchanchaikul P; Rattanacharoenthum A; Pitiphat W
Braz Oral Res; 2015; 29():1-8. PubMed ID: 26486767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dentin Topographic Features following Chemomechanical Caries Removal in Primary Teeth.
Kotb RM; Elkateb MA; Ahmed AM; Kawana KY; El Meligy OA
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2016; 40(6):472-479. PubMed ID: 27805895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of mechanical and chemomechanical methods of caries removal in deciduous and permanent teeth: a SEM study.
Avinash A; Grover SD; Koul M; Nayak MT; Singhvi A; Singh RK
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2012; 30(2):115-21. PubMed ID: 22918095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Partial caries removal in primary teeth: association of clinical parameters with microbiological status.
Lula EC; Almeida LJ; Alves CM; Monteiro-Neto V; Ribeiro CC
Caries Res; 2011; 45(3):275-80. PubMed ID: 21576960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Microtensile bond strength of etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesive systems to demineralized dentin after the use of a papain-based chemomechanical method.
Gianini RJ; do Amaral FL; Flório FM; Basting RT
Am J Dent; 2010 Feb; 23(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 20437723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparative study of the clinical efficiency of chemomechanical caries removal using Carisolv and Papacarie - a papain gel.
Kumar J; Nayak M; Prasad KL; Gupta N
Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(5):697. PubMed ID: 23422631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical and Microbiological Analysis of Mechanical and Chemomechanical Methods of Caries Removal in Deciduous Teeth.
Moimaz SAS; Okamura AQC; Lima DC; Saliba TA; Saliba NA
Oral Health Prev Dent; 2019; 17(3):283-288. PubMed ID: 31209448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Efficacy of chemomechanical caries removal in reducing cariogenic microbiota: a randomized clinical trial.
Ammari MM; Moliterno LF; Hirata Júnior R; Séllos MC; Soviero VM; Coutinho Filho WP
Braz Oral Res; 2014; 28():. PubMed ID: 25141016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of efficacy of caries removal using polymer bur and chemomechanical caries removal agent: A clinical and microbiological assessment - An
Aswathi KK; Rani SP; Athimuthu A; Prasanna P; Patil P; Deepali KJ
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2017; 35(1):6-13. PubMed ID: 28139476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of chemomechanical caries removal on bonding of resin-modified glass ionomer cement adhesives to caries-affected dentine.
Hamama H; Yiu C; Burrow MF
Aust Dent J; 2015 Jun; 60(2):190-9. PubMed ID: 25989193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Effects of three caries removal methods on children's dental fear evaluated by physiological measure].
Wang J; Wang HM
Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2007 Apr; 16(2):149-52. PubMed ID: 17546381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparative evaluation of the efficacy of chemomechanical caries removal agent (Papacarie) and conventional method of caries removal: an in vitro study.
Jawa D; Singh S; Somani R; Jaidka S; Sirkar K; Jaidka R
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2010; 28(2):73-7. PubMed ID: 20660971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Morphology and microtensile bond strength of adhesive systems to in situ-formed caries-affected dentin after the use of a papain-based chemomechanical gel method.
Botelho Amaral FL; Martão Florio F; Bovi Ambrosano GM; Basting RT
Am J Dent; 2011 Feb; 24(1):13-9. PubMed ID: 21469401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of the efficacy of chemomechanical caries removal (Carisolv) with that of conventional excavation in reducing the cariogenic flora.
Azrak B; Callaway A; Grundheber A; Stender E; Willershausen B
Int J Paediatr Dent; 2004 May; 14(3):182-91. PubMed ID: 15139953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
