97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23823428)
1. Area of the ROC curve when one point is available.
Katostaras T; Katostara N
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2013; 190():219-21. PubMed ID: 23823428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Bayesian bootstrap estimation of ROC curve.
Gu J; Ghosal S; Roy A
Stat Med; 2008 Nov; 27(26):5407-20. PubMed ID: 18613217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Tests of equivalence and non-inferiority for diagnostic accuracy based on the paired areas under ROC curves.
Liu JP; Ma MC; Wu CY; Tai JY
Stat Med; 2006 Apr; 25(7):1219-38. PubMed ID: 16158400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Marker selection via maximizing the partial area under the ROC curve of linear risk scores.
Wang Z; Chang YC
Biostatistics; 2011 Apr; 12(2):369-85. PubMed ID: 20729218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A modified sign test for comparing paired ROC curves.
Braun TM; Alonzo TA
Biostatistics; 2008 Apr; 9(2):364-72. PubMed ID: 17925302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. How many readers and cases does one need to conduct an ROC study?
Chakraborty DP
Acad Radiol; 2011 Feb; 18(2):127-8. PubMed ID: 21232680
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. A new parametric method based on S-distributions for computing receiver operating characteristic curves for continuous diagnostic tests.
Sorribas A; March J; Trujillano J
Stat Med; 2002 May; 21(9):1213-35. PubMed ID: 12111875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A smooth ROC curve estimator based on log-concave density estimates.
Rufibach K
Int J Biostat; 2012; 8(1):. PubMed ID: 22611590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Model selection based on FDR-thresholding optimizing the area under the ROC-curve.
Graf AC; Bauer P
Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2009; 8():Article31. PubMed ID: 19572830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An extension of the receiver operating characteristic curve and AUC-optimal classification.
Takenouchi T; Komori O; Eguchi S
Neural Comput; 2012 Oct; 24(10):2789-824. PubMed ID: 22734493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Sample size calculation for the van Elteren test adjusting for ties.
Zhao YD; Rahardja D; Mei Y
J Biopharm Stat; 2008; 18(6):1112-9. PubMed ID: 18991111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Nonparametric estimation of ROC curves in the absence of a gold standard.
Zhou XH; Castelluccio P; Zhou C
Biometrics; 2005 Jun; 61(2):600-9. PubMed ID: 16011710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Confidence interval estimation for sensitivity at a fixed level of specificity for combined biomarkers.
Tian L
J Biopharm Stat; 2013 May; 23(3):499-512. PubMed ID: 23611191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Monte Carlo validation of the Dorfman-Berbaum-Metz method using normalized pseudovalues and less data-based model simplification.
Hillis SL; Berbaum KS
Acad Radiol; 2005 Dec; 12(12):1534-41. PubMed ID: 16321742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of a statistical equivalence test applied to microarray data.
Qiu J; Cui X
J Biopharm Stat; 2010 Mar; 20(2):240-66. PubMed ID: 20309757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The partial area under the summary ROC curve.
Walter SD
Stat Med; 2005 Jul; 24(13):2025-40. PubMed ID: 15900606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Not different is not the same as the same: how can we tell?
Drummond GB; Vowler SL
Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol; 2012 Dec; 39(12):991-4. PubMed ID: 23919813
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Not different is not the same as the same: how can we tell?
Drummond GB; Vowler SL
Adv Physiol Educ; 2012 Dec; 36(4):261-4. PubMed ID: 23209006
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Not different is not the same as the same: how can we tell?
Drummond GB; Vowler SL
Microcirculation; 2012 Nov; 19(8):771-4. PubMed ID: 23164036
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. A conditional nonparametric test for comparing two areas under the ROC curves from a paired design.
Bandos AI; Rockette HE; Gur D
Acad Radiol; 2005 Mar; 12(3):291-7. PubMed ID: 15766688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
