These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23824440)

  • 1. Identification of acoustically similar and dissimilar vowels in profoundly deaf adults who use hearing aids and/or cochlear implants: some preliminary findings.
    Hay-McCutcheon MJ; Peterson NR; Rosado CA; Pisoni DB
    Am J Audiol; 2014 Mar; 23(1):57-70. PubMed ID: 23824440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Postlingually deaf adults of all ages derive equal benefits from unilateral multichannel cochlear implant.
    Park E; Shipp DB; Chen JM; Nedzelski JM; Lin VY
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2011; 22(10):637-43. PubMed ID: 22212763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Minimum spectral contrast needed for vowel identification by normal hearing and cochlear implant listeners.
    Loizou PC; Poroy O
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Sep; 110(3 Pt 1):1619-27. PubMed ID: 11572371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cross-frequency integration for consonant and vowel identification in bimodal hearing.
    Kong YY; Braida LD
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2011 Jun; 54(3):959-80. PubMed ID: 21060139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Identification of vowel length, word stress, and compound words and phrases by postlingually deafened cochlear implant listeners.
    Morris D; Magnusson L; Faulkner A; Jönsson R; Juul H
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Oct; 24(9):879-90. PubMed ID: 24224994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The contribution of a frequency-compression hearing aid to contralateral cochlear implant performance.
    Perreau AE; Bentler RA; Tyler RS
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Feb; 24(2):105-20. PubMed ID: 23357804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bimodal benefits in Mandarin-speaking cochlear implant users with contralateral residual acoustic hearing.
    Yang HI; Zeng FG
    Int J Audiol; 2017; 56(sup2):S17-S22. PubMed ID: 28485635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The use of frequency compression by cochlear implant recipients with postoperative acoustic hearing.
    McDermott H; Henshall K
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2010 Jun; 21(6):380-9. PubMed ID: 20701835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Speech perception skills of children with multichannel cochlear implants or hearing aids.
    Miyamoto RT; Kirk KI; Todd SL; Robbins AM; Osberger MJ
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():334-7. PubMed ID: 7668695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Consonant and Vowel Identification in Cochlear Implant Users Measured by Nonsense Words: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Rødvik AK; von Koss Torkildsen J; Wie OB; Storaker MA; Silvola JT
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2018 Apr; 61(4):1023-1050. PubMed ID: 29623340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of age on concurrent vowel perception in acoustic and simulated electroacoustic hearing.
    Arehart KH; Souza PE; Muralimanohar RK; Miller CW
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2011 Feb; 54(1):190-210. PubMed ID: 20689036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mandarin Tone and Vowel Recognition in Cochlear Implant Users: Effects of Talker Variability and Bimodal Hearing.
    Chang YP; Chang RY; Lin CY; Luo X
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(3):271-81. PubMed ID: 26752089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impact of visual and auditory deprivation on speech perception and production in adults.
    Turgeon C; Trudeau-Fisette P; Lepore F; Lippé S; Ménard L
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2020 Dec; 34(12):1061-1087. PubMed ID: 32013589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Use of acoustic cues by children with cochlear implants.
    Giezen MR; Escudero P; Baker A
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2010 Dec; 53(6):1440-57. PubMed ID: 20689031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Perception of vowels and prosody by cochlear implant recipients in noise.
    Van Zyl M; Hanekom JJ
    J Commun Disord; 2013; 46(5-6):449-64. PubMed ID: 24157128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Acoustic Analysis of Persian Vowels in Cochlear Implant Users: A Comparison With Hearing-impaired Children Using Hearing Aid and Normal-hearing Children.
    Jafari N; Yadegari F; Jalaie S
    J Voice; 2016 Nov; 30(6):763.e1-763.e7. PubMed ID: 26725549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Vowel Production in Prelingually Deafened Mandarin-Speaking Children With Cochlear Implants.
    Yang J; Xu L
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2021 Feb; 64(2):664-682. PubMed ID: 33524265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparing implants with hearing aids in profoundly deaf children.
    Geers AE
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1997 Sep; 117(3 Pt 1):150-4. PubMed ID: 9334758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mandarin compound vowels produced by prelingually deafened children with cochlear implants.
    Yang J; Xu L
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Jun; 97():143-149. PubMed ID: 28483225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An acoustic analysis of the vowel space in young and old cochlear-implant speakers.
    Neumeyer V; Harrington J; Draxler C
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2010 Sep; 24(9):734-41. PubMed ID: 20645857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.