These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23824994)

  • 61. Meta-research: The art of getting it wrong.
    Ioannidis JP
    Res Synth Methods; 2010 Jul; 1(3-4):169-84. PubMed ID: 26061464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Stopping at nothing? Some dilemmas of data monitoring in clinical trials.
    Goodman SN
    Ann Intern Med; 2007 Jun; 146(12):882-7. PubMed ID: 17577008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. The impact of left truncation of exposure in environmental case-control studies: evidence from breast cancer risk associated with airborne dioxin.
    Zhai Y; Amadou A; Mercier C; Praud D; Faure E; Iwaz J; Severi G; Mancini FR; Coudon T; Fervers B; Roy P
    Eur J Epidemiol; 2022 Jan; 37(1):79-93. PubMed ID: 34254231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Can quality of clinical trials and meta-analyses be quantified?
    Ioannidis JP; Lau J
    Lancet; 1998 Aug; 352(9128):590-1. PubMed ID: 9746014
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Effects of truncation on reaction time analysis.
    Ulrich R; Miller J
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1994 Mar; 123(1):34-80. PubMed ID: 8138779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Correcting for outcome reporting bias in a meta-analysis: A meta-regression approach.
    van Aert RCM; Wicherts JM
    Behav Res Methods; 2024 Mar; 56(3):1994-2012. PubMed ID: 37540470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Effects on overviews of early stopping rules for clinical trials.
    Green SJ; Fleming TR; Emerson S
    Stat Med; 1987; 6(3):361-9. PubMed ID: 3616289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Bias due to left truncation and left censoring in longitudinal studies of developmental and disease processes.
    Cain KC; Harlow SD; Little RJ; Nan B; Yosef M; Taffe JR; Elliott MR
    Am J Epidemiol; 2011 May; 173(9):1078-84. PubMed ID: 21422059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Adjusting for bias in the mean for primary and secondary outcomes when trials are in sequence.
    Rothwell JC; Julious SA; Cooper CL
    Pharm Stat; 2022 Mar; 21(2):460-475. PubMed ID: 34860471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Monitoring for lack of benefit: a critical component of a randomized clinical trial.
    Freidlin B; Korn EL
    J Clin Oncol; 2009 Feb; 27(4):629-33. PubMed ID: 19064977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Reader reaction on estimation of treatment effects in all-comers randomized clinical trials with a predictive marker.
    Korn EL; Freidlin B
    Biometrics; 2017 Jun; 73(2):706-708. PubMed ID: 27775815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. CORRECTING FOR SAMPLING BIAS IN QUANTITATIVE MEASURES OF SELECTION WHEN FITNESS IS DISCRETE.
    Blanckenhorn WU; Reuter M; Ward PI; Barbour AD
    Evolution; 1999 Feb; 53(1):286-291. PubMed ID: 28565176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Stepwise-Hierarchical Pooled Analysis for Synergistic Interpretation of Meta-analyses Involving Randomized and Observational Studies: Methodology Development.
    Shin IS; Rim CH
    J Med Internet Res; 2021 Sep; 23(9):e29642. PubMed ID: 34315697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Stopping trials early for positive results: the need to know how much.
    Atkins CD
    J Clin Oncol; 2009 Jul; 27(21):e29; author reply e30. PubMed ID: 19546399
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. A method was developed for correcting the bias in the usual study weights in meta-analyses.
    Walter SD; Balakrishnan N
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2022 Dec; 152():23-29. PubMed ID: 36150550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. A Note on Cherry-Picking in Meta-Analyses.
    Yoneoka D; Rieck B
    Entropy (Basel); 2023 Apr; 25(4):. PubMed ID: 37190479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Correction: Effect of Risk of Bias on the Effect Size of Meta-Analytic Estimates in Randomized Controlled Trials in Periodontology and Implant Dentistry.
    Faggion CM; Wu YC; Scheidgen M; Tu YK
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(11):e0142233. PubMed ID: 26556720
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. The "golden section" and bias in perceptions of social consensus.
    Gross SR; Miller N
    Pers Soc Psychol Rev; 1997; 1(3):241-71. PubMed ID: 15659352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Stopping Trials Early: Responsibility and Risks.
    McGuire W; Halliday HL
    Neonatology; 2021; 118(3):342-344. PubMed ID: 33794539
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Response from the Editors: time-lapse systems for ART - meta-analyses and the issue of bias.
    Alikani M; Fauser BCJM; Anderson R; García-Velasco JA; Johnson M
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2018 Mar; 36(3):293. PubMed ID: 29358033
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.