206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23825221)
21. Dosimetry of two extraoral direct digital imaging devices: NewTom cone beam CT and Orthophos Plus DS panoramic unit.
Ludlow JB; Davies-Ludlow LE; Brooks SL
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2003 Jul; 32(4):229-34. PubMed ID: 13679353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Cone beam computed tomography and low-dose multislice computed tomography in orthodontics and dentistry: a comparative evaluation on image quality and radiation exposure.
Hofmann E; Schmid M; Lell M; Hirschfelder U
J Orofac Orthop; 2014 Sep; 75(5):384-98. PubMed ID: 25158951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A comparative study of the effective radiation doses from cone beam computed tomography and plain radiography for sialography.
Jadu F; Yaffe MJ; Lam EW
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2010 Jul; 39(5):257-63. PubMed ID: 20587648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Radiation dose from cone beam computed tomography for image-guided radiation therapy.
Kan MW; Leung LH; Wong W; Lam N
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2008 Jan; 70(1):272-9. PubMed ID: 17980510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Radiation dose of cone-beam computed tomography compared to conventional radiographs in orthodontics.
Signorelli L; Patcas R; Peltomäki T; Schätzle M
J Orofac Orthop; 2016 Jan; 77(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 26747662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Comparative study of image quality and radiation dose of cone beam and low-dose multislice computed tomography--an in-vitro investigation.
Hofmann E; Schmid M; Sedlmair M; Banckwitz R; Hirschfelder U; Lell M
Clin Oral Investig; 2014 Jan; 18(1):301-11. PubMed ID: 23460022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Effective dose span of ten different cone beam CT devices.
Rottke D; Patzelt S; Poxleitner P; Schulze D
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(7):20120417. PubMed ID: 23584925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Dosimetry of a cone-beam computed tomography machine compared with a digital x-ray machine in orthodontic imaging.
Grünheid T; Kolbeck Schieck JR; Pliska BT; Ahmad M; Larson BE
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Apr; 141(4):436-43. PubMed ID: 22464525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparison of manual and dose reduction modes of a MORITA R100 CBCT.
Rottke D; Dreger J; Sawada K; Honda K; Schulze D
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2019 Feb; 48(2):20180009. PubMed ID: 30182744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Head and neck effective dose and quantitative assessment of image quality: a study to compare cone beam CT and multislice spiral CT.
Nardi C; Talamonti C; Pallotta S; Saletti P; Calistri L; Cordopatri C; Colagrande S
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2017 Oct; 46(7):20170030. PubMed ID: 28511564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. 3D cone-beam CT of the ankle using a novel twin robotic X-ray system: Assessment of image quality and radiation dose.
Grunz JP; Kunz AS; Gietzen CH; Weng AM; Veyhl-Wichmann M; Ergün S; Schmitt R; Bley TA; Gassenmaier T
Eur J Radiol; 2019 Oct; 119():108659. PubMed ID: 31520930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. [Cross-sectional imaging in dentomaxillofacial diagnostics: dose comparison of dental MSCT and NewTom 9000 DVT].
Coppenrath E; Draenert F; Lechel U; Veit R; Meindl T; Reiser M; Mueller-Lisse U
Rofo; 2008 May; 180(5):396-401. PubMed ID: 18543414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Postoperative computed tomography imaging of pediatric patients with craniosynostosis: radiation dose and image quality comparison between multi-slice computed tomography and O-arm cone-beam computed tomography.
Kaasalainen T; Männistö V; Mäkelä T; Suojanen J; Nuorala A; Heliövaara A; Leikola J
Pediatr Radiol; 2023 Jul; 53(8):1704-1712. PubMed ID: 36967418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Morphologic examination of the temporal bone by cone beam computed tomography: comparison with multislice helical computed tomography.
Dahmani-Causse M; Marx M; Deguine O; Fraysse B; Lepage B; Escudé B
Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis; 2011 Nov; 128(5):230-5. PubMed ID: 22014530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Radiation dose from X-ray examinations of impacted canines: cone beam CT vs two-dimensional imaging.
Kadesjö N; Lynds R; Nilsson M; Shi XQ
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2018 Feb; 47(3):20170305. PubMed ID: 29303367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparative dosimetry of dental CBCT devices and 64-slice CT for oral and maxillofacial radiology.
Ludlow JB; Ivanovic M
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Jul; 106(1):106-14. PubMed ID: 18504152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Assessment of radiation exposure in dental cone-beam computerized tomography with the use of metal-oxide semiconductor field-effect transistor (MOSFET) dosimeters and Monte Carlo simulations.
Koivisto J; Kiljunen T; Tapiovaara M; Wolff J; Kortesniemi M
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2012 Sep; 114(3):393-400. PubMed ID: 22862982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Surface radiation dose comparison of a dedicated extremity cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) device and a multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) machine in pediatric ankle and wrist phantoms.
Tschauner S; Marterer R; Nagy E; Apfaltrer G; Riccabona M; Singer G; Stücklschweiger G; Guss H; Sorantin E
PLoS One; 2017; 12(6):e0178747. PubMed ID: 28570626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Effective radiation dose and eye lens dose in dental cone beam CT: effect of field of view and angle of rotation.
Pauwels R; Zhang G; Theodorakou C; Walker A; Bosmans H; Jacobs R; Bogaerts R; Horner K;
Br J Radiol; 2014 Oct; 87(1042):20130654. PubMed ID: 25189417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Dosimetric study of mandible examinations performed with three cone-beam computed tomography scanners.
Khoury HJ; Andrade ME; Araujo MW; Brasileiro IV; Kramer R; Huda A
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Jul; 165(1-4):162-5. PubMed ID: 25897144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
