These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

221 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23825262)

  • 1. Predicting scientists' participation in public life.
    Besley JC; Oh SH; Nisbet M
    Public Underst Sci; 2013 Nov; 22(8):971-87. PubMed ID: 23825262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. How scientists view the public, the media and the political process.
    Besley JC; Nisbet M
    Public Underst Sci; 2013 Aug; 22(6):644-59. PubMed ID: 23885050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison between scientists' and communication scholars' views about scientists' public engagement activities.
    Yuan S; Besley JC; Dudo A
    Public Underst Sci; 2019 Jan; 28(1):101-118. PubMed ID: 30175667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Scientists' opinions and attitudes towards citizens' understanding of science and their role in public engagement activities.
    Llorente C; Revuelta G; Carrió M; Porta M
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(11):e0224262. PubMed ID: 31721768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Chinese scientists' mediated participation in public outreach: Multiple direct and personal norm-mediated predictors.
    Zhang X; Chen A; Jin J
    Public Underst Sci; 2024 Mar; ():9636625241237927. PubMed ID: 38545910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. How institutional factors at US land-grant universities impact scientists' public scholarship.
    Bao L; Calice MN; Brossard D; Beets B; Scheufele DA; Rose KM
    Public Underst Sci; 2023 Feb; 32(2):124-142. PubMed ID: 35652301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A triangulated approach for understanding scientists' perceptions of public engagement with science.
    Calice MN; Bao L; Beets B; Brossard D; Scheufele DA; Feinstein NW; Heisler L; Tangen T; Handelsman J
    Public Underst Sci; 2023 Apr; 32(3):389-406. PubMed ID: 36154528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The lure of rationality: Why does the deficit model persist in science communication?
    Simis MJ; Madden H; Cacciatore MA; Yeo SK
    Public Underst Sci; 2016 May; 25(4):400-14. PubMed ID: 27117768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Lithuanian scientists' behavior and views on science communication.
    Valinciute A
    Public Underst Sci; 2020 Apr; 29(3):353-362. PubMed ID: 32126899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Scientists' Prioritization of Communication Objectives for Public Engagement.
    Dudo A; Besley JC
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(2):e0148867. PubMed ID: 26913869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Why the views of Latin American Scientists on Citizen Science as a Tool for Pollinator Monitoring and Conservation Matter?
    Viana BF; Souza CQ; Moreira EF
    Neotrop Entomol; 2020 Aug; 49(4):604-613. PubMed ID: 32761554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Conflicting stories about public scientific controversies: Effects of news convergence and divergence on scientists' credibility.
    Jensen JD; Hurley RJ
    Public Underst Sci; 2012 Aug; 21(6):689-704. PubMed ID: 23832155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Perceived behavioral control as a moderator: Scientists' attitude, norms, and willingness to engage the public.
    Ho SS; Goh TJ; Chuah ASF
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(10):e0275643. PubMed ID: 36197896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Normative dissonance in science: results from a national survey of u.s. Scientists.
    Anderson MS; Martinson BC; De Vries R
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2007 Dec; 2(4):3-14. PubMed ID: 19385804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Responding to Richard: Celebrity and (mis)representation of science.
    Johnson DR; Ecklund EH; Di D; Matthews KRW
    Public Underst Sci; 2018 Jul; 27(5):535-549. PubMed ID: 29956596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Family pediatrics: report of the Task Force on the Family.
    Schor EL;
    Pediatrics; 2003 Jun; 111(6 Pt 2):1541-71. PubMed ID: 12777595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Americans' views of scientists' motivations for scientific work.
    Johnson BB; Dieckmann NF
    Public Underst Sci; 2020 Jan; 29(1):2-20. PubMed ID: 31621505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Scientists' deficit perception of the public impedes their behavioral intentions to correct misinformation.
    Choi S; Anderson AA; Cagle S; Long M; Kelp N
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(8):e0287870. PubMed ID: 37531388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Scientists' views about communication objectives.
    Besley JC; Dudo A; Yuan S
    Public Underst Sci; 2018 Aug; 27(6):708-730. PubMed ID: 28841818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. On being a (modern) scientist: risks of public engagement in the UK interspecies embryo debate.
    Porter J; Williams C; Wainwright S; Cribb A
    New Genet Soc; 2012 Dec; 31(4):408-423. PubMed ID: 23293548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.