These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

222 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23825262)

  • 21. Scientific risk communication about controversial issues influences public perceptions of scientists' political orientations and credibility.
    Vraga E; Myers T; Kotcher J; Beall L; Maibach E
    R Soc Open Sci; 2018 Feb; 5(2):170505. PubMed ID: 29515820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. An emerging form of public engagement with science: Ask Me Anything (AMA) sessions on Reddit r/science.
    Hara N; Abbazio J; Perkins K
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(5):e0216789. PubMed ID: 31091264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A critical evaluation of science outreach via social media: its role and impact on scientists.
    McClain C; Neeley L
    F1000Res; 2014; 3():300. PubMed ID: 25866620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Safe and Sound? Scientists' Understandings of Public Engagement in Emerging Biotechnologies.
    Braun M; Starkbaum J; Dabrock P
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(12):e0145033. PubMed ID: 26660160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Public participation in human genome editing research governance: what do scientists think?
    Waltz M; Flatt MA; Juengst ET; Conley JM; Cadigan RJ
    J Community Genet; 2024 Jun; 15(3):249-257. PubMed ID: 38353891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Research in clinical laboratory science: professionals' involvement.
    Laudicina R; Fenn JP; Freeman V; McCoy C; McLane MA; Mundt L; Polancic J; Randolph T; Shanahan K
    Clin Lab Sci; 2011; 24(4):235-42. PubMed ID: 22288223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Scientific authority in policy contexts: Public attitudes about environmental scientists, medical researchers, and economists.
    O'Brien TL
    Public Underst Sci; 2013 Oct; 22(7):799-816. PubMed ID: 24048622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. How academic biologists and physicists view science outreach.
    Ecklund EH; James SA; Lincoln AE
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(5):e36240. PubMed ID: 22590526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. "The chilling effect": Medical scientists' responses to audience feedback on their media appearances during the COVID-19 pandemic.
    Nölleke D; Leonhardt BM; Hanusch F
    Public Underst Sci; 2023 Jul; 32(5):546-560. PubMed ID: 36633310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Scientists' incentives and attitudes toward public communication.
    Rose KM; Markowitz EM; Brossard D
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2020 Jan; 117(3):1274-1276. PubMed ID: 31911470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Lay beliefs about scientists' relations with their employers.
    Johnson BB; Dieckmann NF
    Public Underst Sci; 2021 Jan; 30(1):103-114. PubMed ID: 33103590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. How the public evaluates media representations of uncertain science: An integrated explanatory framework.
    Ratcliff CL; Wicke R
    Public Underst Sci; 2023 May; 32(4):410-427. PubMed ID: 36196654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Developing Science Communication in Africa: Undergraduate and Graduate Students should be Trained and Actively Involved in Outreach Activity Development and Implementation.
    Karikari TK; Yawson NA; Quansah E
    J Undergrad Neurosci Educ; 2016; 14(2):E5-8. PubMed ID: 27385932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Values, objectivity and credibility of scientists in a contentious natural resource debate.
    Yamamoto YT
    Public Underst Sci; 2012 Jan; 21(1):101-25. PubMed ID: 22530490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Language and values in the human cloning debate: a web-based survey of scientists and Christian fundamentalist pastors.
    Weasel LH; Jensen E
    New Genet Soc; 2005 Apr; 24(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 16552907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. What does the UK public want from academic science communication?
    Redfern J; Illingworth S; Verran J
    F1000Res; 2016; 5():1261. PubMed ID: 27347384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The ethics of scientific research: an analysis of focus groups of scientists and institutional representatives.
    Wenger NS; Korenman SG; Berk R; Berry S
    J Investig Med; 1997 Aug; 45(6):371-80. PubMed ID: 9291693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Increasing both the public health potential of basic research and the scientist satisfaction. An international survey of bio-scientists.
    Sorrentino C; Boggio A; Confalonieri S; Hemenway D; Scita G; Ballabeni A
    F1000Res; 2016; 5():56. PubMed ID: 27347372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Microbiologists' Public Engagement Views and Behaviors.
    Dudo A; Besley J; Kahlor LA; Koh H; Copple J; Yuan S
    J Microbiol Biol Educ; 2018; 19(1):. PubMed ID: 29904524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Science Communication Training Imparts Confidence and Influences Public Engagement Activity.
    Swords CM; Porter JS; Hawkins AJ; Li E; Rowland-Goldsmith M; Koci MD; Tansey JT; Woitowich NC
    J Microbiol Biol Educ; 2023 Aug; 24(2):. PubMed ID: 37614888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.