171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23826854)
1. Clinical implications in the use of the PBC algorithm versus the AAA by comparison of different NTCP models/parameters.
Bufacchi A; Nardiello B; Capparella R; Begnozzi L
Radiat Oncol; 2013 Jul; 8(1):164. PubMed ID: 23826854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Influence of different dose calculation algorithms on the estimate of NTCP for lung complications.
Hedin E; Bäck A
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2013 Sep; 14(5):127-39. PubMed ID: 24036865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Radiobiological impact of dose calculation algorithms on biologically optimized IMRT lung stereotactic body radiation therapy plans.
Liang X; Penagaricano J; Zheng D; Morrill S; Zhang X; Corry P; Griffin RJ; Han EY; Hardee M; Ratanatharathom V
Radiat Oncol; 2016 Jan; 11():10. PubMed ID: 26800883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Influence of dose calculation algorithms on the predicted dose distribution and NTCP values for NSCLC patients.
Nielsen TB; Wieslander E; Fogliata A; Nielsen M; Hansen O; Brink C
Med Phys; 2011 May; 38(5):2412-8. PubMed ID: 21776775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The photon dose calculation algorithm used in breast radiotherapy has significant impact on the parameters of radiobiological models.
Petillion S; Swinnen A; Defraene G; Verhoeven K; Weltens C; Van den Heuvel F
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2014 Jul; 15(4):259–269. PubMed ID: 25207416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of 3D conformal breast radiation treatment plans using the anisotropic analytical algorithm and pencil beam convolution algorithm.
Yoo S; Wu Q; O'Daniel J; Horton J; Yin FF
Radiother Oncol; 2012 May; 103(2):172-7. PubMed ID: 22349127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The impact of dose calculation algorithms on partial and whole breast radiation treatment plans.
Basran PS; Zavgorodni S; Berrang T; Olivotto IA; Beckham W
Radiat Oncol; 2010 Dec; 5():120. PubMed ID: 21162739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical implications of the anisotropic analytical algorithm for IMRT treatment planning and verification.
Bragg CM; Wingate K; Conway J
Radiother Oncol; 2008 Feb; 86(2):276-84. PubMed ID: 18249453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical implication in the use of the AAA algorithm versus the AXB in nasopharyngeal carcinomas by comparison of TCP and NTCP values.
Bufacchi A; Caspiani O; Rambaldi G; Marmiroli L; Giovinazzo G; Polsoni M
Radiat Oncol; 2020 Jun; 15(1):150. PubMed ID: 32532351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Influence of dose calculation model on treatment plan evaluation in conformal radiotherapy: a three-case study.
Miften MM; Beavis AW; Marks LB
Med Dosim; 2002; 27(1):51-7. PubMed ID: 12019966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Analytical anisotropic algorithm versus pencil beam convolution for treatment planning of breast cancer: implications for target coverage and radiation burden of normal tissue.
Flejmer AM; Dohlmar F; Nilsson M; Stenmarker M; Dasu A
Anticancer Res; 2015 May; 35(5):2841-8. PubMed ID: 25964565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Ipsilateral lung normal tissue complication probability parameters for different dose calculation algorithms in radiotherapy of breast cancer.
Kavousi N; Nedaie HA; Gholami S; Esfahani M; Shafiekhani S; Hassani M
J Cancer Res Ther; 2020; 16(6):1323-1330. PubMed ID: 33342791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Verification of IMRT dose calculations using AAA and PBC algorithms in dose buildup regions.
Oinam AS; Singh L
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2010 Aug; 11(4):3351. PubMed ID: 21081894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Three-dimensional heart dose reconstruction to estimate normal tissue complication probability after breast irradiation using portal dosimetry.
Louwe RJ; Wendling M; van Herk MB; Mijnheer BJ
Med Phys; 2007 Apr; 34(4):1354-63. PubMed ID: 17500466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. AAA and PBC calculation accuracy in the surface build-up region in tangential beam treatments. Phantom and breast case study with the Monte Carlo code PENELOPE.
Panettieri V; Barsoum P; Westermark M; Brualla L; Lax I
Radiother Oncol; 2009 Oct; 93(1):94-101. PubMed ID: 19541380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dosimetric and radiobiological comparison in different dose calculation grid sizes between Acuros XB and anisotropic analytical algorithm for prostate VMAT.
Kim KH; Chung JB; Suh TS; Kang SW; Kang SH; Eom KY; Song C; Kim IA; Kim JS
PLoS One; 2018; 13(11):e0207232. PubMed ID: 30419058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Sensitivity of NTCP parameter values against a change of dose calculation algorithm.
Brink C; Berg M; Nielsen M
Med Phys; 2007 Sep; 34(9):3579-86. PubMed ID: 17926961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dosimetric evaluation of the Acuros XB algorithm for a 4 MV photon beam in head and neck intensity-modulated radiation therapy.
Hirata K; Nakamura M; Yoshimura M; Mukumoto N; Nakata M; Ito H; Inokuchi H; Matsuo Y; Mizowaki T; Hiraoka M
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Jul; 16(4):52–64. PubMed ID: 26218997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of dose-response models and parameters predicting radiation induced pneumonitis using clinical data from breast cancer radiotherapy.
Tsougos I; Mavroidis P; Rajala J; Theodorou K; Järvenpää R; Pitkänen MA; Holli K; Ojala AT; Lind BK; Hyödynmaa S; Kappas C
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Aug; 50(15):3535-54. PubMed ID: 16030381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessing the shift of radiobiological metrics in lung radiotherapy plans using 2D gamma index.
Chaikh A; Balosso J
Transl Lung Cancer Res; 2016 Jun; 5(3):265-71. PubMed ID: 27413708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
