134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23826858)
1. Scaffold hopping by fragment replacement.
Vainio MJ; Kogej T; Raubacher F; Sadowski J
J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Jul; 53(7):1825-35. PubMed ID: 23826858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Unconventional 2D shape similarity method affords comparable enrichment as a 3D shape method in virtual screening experiments.
Ebalunode JO; Zheng W
J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Jun; 49(6):1313-20. PubMed ID: 19480404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Use of reduced graphs to encode bioisosterism for similarity-based virtual screening.
Birchall K; Gillet VJ; Willett P; Ducrot P; Luttmann C
J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Jun; 49(6):1330-46. PubMed ID: 19485397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. SHOP: scaffold HOPping by GRID-based similarity searches.
Bergmann R; Linusson A; Zamora I
J Med Chem; 2007 May; 50(11):2708-17. PubMed ID: 17489578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Do not hesitate to use Tversky-and other hints for successful active analogue searches with feature count descriptors.
Horvath D; Marcou G; Varnek A
J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Jul; 53(7):1543-62. PubMed ID: 23731338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Database of bioactive ring systems with calculated properties and its use in bioisosteric design and scaffold hopping.
Ertl P
Bioorg Med Chem; 2012 Sep; 20(18):5436-42. PubMed ID: 22436390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Virtual screening and scaffold hopping based on GRID molecular interaction fields.
Ahlström MM; Ridderström M; Luthman K; Zamora I
J Chem Inf Model; 2005; 45(5):1313-23. PubMed ID: 16180908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Development of a method to consistently quantify the structural distance between scaffolds and to assess scaffold hopping potential.
Li R; Stumpfe D; Vogt M; Geppert H; Bajorath J
J Chem Inf Model; 2011 Oct; 51(10):2507-14. PubMed ID: 21955025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Recore: a fast and versatile method for scaffold hopping based on small molecule crystal structure conformations.
Maass P; Schulz-Gasch T; Stahl M; Rarey M
J Chem Inf Model; 2007; 47(2):390-9. PubMed ID: 17305328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Subpocket analysis method for fragment-based drug discovery.
Kalliokoski T; Olsson TS; Vulpetti A
J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Jan; 53(1):131-41. PubMed ID: 23327721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Intuitive ordering of scaffolds and scaffold similarity searching using scaffold keys.
Ertl P
J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Jun; 54(6):1617-22. PubMed ID: 24846291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quantum Isostere Database: a web-based tool using quantum chemical topology to predict bioisosteric replacements for drug design.
Devereux M; Popelier PL; McLay IM
J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Jun; 49(6):1497-513. PubMed ID: 19453153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. LigMatch: a multiple structure-based ligand matching method for 3D virtual screening.
Kinnings SL; Jackson RM
J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Sep; 49(9):2056-66. PubMed ID: 19685924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparative evaluation of 3D virtual ligand screening methods: impact of the molecular alignment on enrichment.
Giganti D; Guillemain H; Spadoni JL; Nilges M; Zagury JF; Montes M
J Chem Inf Model; 2010 Jun; 50(6):992-1004. PubMed ID: 20527883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Analysis and comparison of 2D fingerprints: insights into database screening performance using eight fingerprint methods.
Duan J; Dixon SL; Lowrie JF; Sherman W
J Mol Graph Model; 2010 Sep; 29(2):157-70. PubMed ID: 20579912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A novel search engine for virtual screening of very large databases.
Vidal D; Thormann M; Pons M
J Chem Inf Model; 2006; 46(2):836-43. PubMed ID: 16563015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Similarity searching and scaffold hopping in synthetically accessible combinatorial chemistry spaces.
Boehm M; Wu TY; Claussen H; Lemmen C
J Med Chem; 2008 Apr; 51(8):2468-80. PubMed ID: 18380426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Rapid shape-based ligand alignment and virtual screening method based on atom/feature-pair similarities and volume overlap scoring.
Sastry GM; Dixon SL; Sherman W
J Chem Inf Model; 2011 Oct; 51(10):2455-66. PubMed ID: 21870862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. SHOP: receptor-based scaffold HOPping by GRID-based similarity searches.
Bergmann R; Liljefors T; Sørensen MD; Zamora I
J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Mar; 49(3):658-69. PubMed ID: 19265417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Visualization and virtual screening of the chemical universe database GDB-17.
Ruddigkeit L; Blum LC; Reymond JL
J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Jan; 53(1):56-65. PubMed ID: 23259841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
