134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23826858)
21. Bioisosteric Replacement and Scaffold Hopping in Lead Generation and Optimization.
Langdon SR; Ertl P; Brown N
Mol Inform; 2010 May; 29(5):366-85. PubMed ID: 27463193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. LEAP into the Pfizer Global Virtual Library (PGVL) space: creation of readily synthesizable design ideas automatically.
Hu Q; Peng Z; Kostrowicki J; Kuki A
Methods Mol Biol; 2011; 685():253-76. PubMed ID: 20981528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A comprehensive comparative assessment of 3D molecular similarity tools in ligand-based virtual screening.
Jiang Z; Xu J; Yan A; Wang L
Brief Bioinform; 2021 Nov; 22(6):. PubMed ID: 34151363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. FieldScreen: virtual screening using molecular fields. Application to the DUD data set.
Cheeseright TJ; Mackey MD; Melville JL; Vinter JG
J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Nov; 48(11):2108-17. PubMed ID: 18991371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Fuzzy pharmacophore models from molecular alignments for correlation-vector-based virtual screening.
Renner S; Schneider G
J Med Chem; 2004 Sep; 47(19):4653-64. PubMed ID: 15341481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Unsupervised 3D ring template searching as an ideas generator for scaffold hopping: use of the LAMDA, RigFit, and field-based similarity search (FBSS) methods.
Bohl M; Loeprecht B; Wendt B; Heritage T; Richmond NJ; Willett P
J Chem Inf Model; 2006; 46(5):1882-90. PubMed ID: 16995717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. How similar are similarity searching methods? A principal component analysis of molecular descriptor space.
Bender A; Jenkins JL; Scheiber J; Sukuru SC; Glick M; Davies JW
J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Jan; 49(1):108-19. PubMed ID: 19123924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. A new method for in-silico drug screening and similarity search using molecular dynamics maximum volume overlap (MD-MVO) method.
Fukunishi Y; Nakamura H
J Mol Graph Model; 2009 Jan; 27(5):628-36. PubMed ID: 19046907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Pharmit: interactive exploration of chemical space.
Sunseri J; Koes DR
Nucleic Acids Res; 2016 Jul; 44(W1):W442-8. PubMed ID: 27095195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. 3D QSAR pharmacophore based virtual screening and molecular docking for identification of potential HSP90 inhibitors.
Sakkiah S; Thangapandian S; John S; Kwon YJ; Lee KW
Eur J Med Chem; 2010 Jun; 45(6):2132-40. PubMed ID: 20206418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Fuzzy tricentric pharmacophore fingerprints. 1. Topological fuzzy pharmacophore triplets and adapted molecular similarity scoring schemes.
Bonachéra F; Parent B; Barbosa F; Froloff N; Horvath D
J Chem Inf Model; 2006; 46(6):2457-77. PubMed ID: 17125187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. ErG: 2D pharmacophore descriptions for scaffold hopping.
Stiefl N; Watson IA; Baumann K; Zaliani A
J Chem Inf Model; 2006; 46(1):208-20. PubMed ID: 16426057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Hit expansion approaches using multiple similarity methods and virtualized query structures.
Bergner A; Parel SP
J Chem Inf Model; 2013 May; 53(5):1057-66. PubMed ID: 23600728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Ligand-target interaction-based weighting of substructures for virtual screening.
Crisman TJ; Sisay MT; Bajorath J
J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Oct; 48(10):1955-64. PubMed ID: 18821751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. New methods for ligand-based virtual screening: use of data fusion and machine learning to enhance the effectiveness of similarity searching.
Hert J; Willett P; Wilton DJ; Acklin P; Azzaoui K; Jacoby E; Schuffenhauer A
J Chem Inf Model; 2006; 46(2):462-70. PubMed ID: 16562973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Implementing a MIRC query interface for a database driven teaching file.
Tellis WM; Andriole KP
J Digit Imaging; 2003 Jun; 16(2):180-4. PubMed ID: 14517722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Systematic assessment of scaffold hopping versus activity cliff formation across bioactive compound classes following a molecular hierarchy.
Stumpfe D; Dimova D; Bajorath J
Bioorg Med Chem; 2015 Jul; 23(13):3183-91. PubMed ID: 25982076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. SHAFTS: a hybrid approach for 3D molecular similarity calculation. 1. Method and assessment of virtual screening.
Liu X; Jiang H; Li H
J Chem Inf Model; 2011 Sep; 51(9):2372-85. PubMed ID: 21819157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Using Tversky similarity searches for core hopping: finding the needles in the haystack.
Senger S
J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Jun; 49(6):1514-24. PubMed ID: 19453147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. PTGL--a web-based database application for protein topologies.
May P; Barthel S; Koch I
Bioinformatics; 2004 Nov; 20(17):3277-9. PubMed ID: 15217820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
