BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

717 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23827608)

  • 1. Mg ion implantation on SLA-treated titanium surface and its effects on the behavior of mesenchymal stem cell.
    Kim BS; Kim JS; Park YM; Choi BY; Lee J
    Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2013 Apr; 33(3):1554-60. PubMed ID: 23827608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The roles of extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 pathway in regulating osteogenic differentiation of murine preosteoblasts MC3T3-E1 cells on roughened titanium surfaces.
    Zhuang LF; Jiang HH; Qiao SC; Appert C; Si MS; Gu YX; Lai HC
    J Biomed Mater Res A; 2012 Jan; 100(1):125-33. PubMed ID: 21997903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Multifunctions of dual Zn/Mg ion co-implanted titanium on osteogenesis, angiogenesis and bacteria inhibition for dental implants.
    Yu Y; Jin G; Xue Y; Wang D; Liu X; Sun J
    Acta Biomater; 2017 Feb; 49():590-603. PubMed ID: 27915020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of phosphoric acid treatment of titanium surfaces on surface properties, osteoblast response and removal of torque forces.
    Park JW; Kim YJ; Jang JH; Kwon TG; Bae YC; Suh JY
    Acta Biomater; 2010 Apr; 6(4):1661-70. PubMed ID: 19819355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of Titanium Surface Microtopography and Simvastatin on Growth and Osteogenic Differentiation of Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Estrogen-Deprived Cell Culture.
    Arpornmaeklong P; Pripatnanont P; Chookiatsiri C; Tangtrakulwanich B
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2017; 32(1):e35-e46. PubMed ID: 28095523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of titanium surface roughness on mesenchymal stem cell commitment and differentiation signaling.
    Balloni S; Calvi EM; Damiani F; Bistoni G; Calvitti M; Locci P; Becchetti E; Marinucci L
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(4):627-35. PubMed ID: 19885402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of human mandibular osteoblasts grown on two commercially available titanium implant surfaces.
    Galli C; Guizzardi S; Passeri G; Martini D; Tinti A; Mauro G; Macaluso GM
    J Periodontol; 2005 Mar; 76(3):364-72. PubMed ID: 15857069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Attachment and proliferation of human osteoblast-like cells (MG-63) on laser-ablated titanium implant material.
    Györgyey Á; Ungvári K; Kecskeméti G; Kopniczky J; Hopp B; Oszkó A; Pelsöczi I; Rakonczay Z; Nagy K; Turzó K
    Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2013 Oct; 33(7):4251-9. PubMed ID: 23910340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Different titanium surface treatment influences human mandibular osteoblast response.
    Guizzardi S; Galli C; Martini D; Belletti S; Tinti A; Raspanti M; Taddei P; Ruggeri A; Scandroglio R
    J Periodontol; 2004 Feb; 75(2):273-82. PubMed ID: 15068116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Osteoblastic cell behaviour on modified titanium surfaces.
    Lukaszewska-Kuska M; Wirstlein P; Majchrowski R; Dorocka-Bobkowska B
    Micron; 2018 Feb; 105():55-63. PubMed ID: 29179009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Osteoblast-like cell attachment and proliferation on turned, blasted, and anodized titanium surfaces.
    Pae A; Kim SS; Kim HS; Woo YH
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(3):475-81. PubMed ID: 21691593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Osteogenic activity and antibacterial effect of zinc ion implanted titanium.
    Jin G; Cao H; Qiao Y; Meng F; Zhu H; Liu X
    Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces; 2014 May; 117():158-65. PubMed ID: 24632388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Response of human bone marrow stromal cells, MG-63, and SaOS-2 to titanium-based dental implant surfaces with different topography and surface energy.
    Hempel U; Hefti T; Dieter P; Schlottig F
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Feb; 24(2):174-82. PubMed ID: 22092368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The cytocompatibility and osseointegration of the Ti implants with XPEED® surfaces.
    Lee SY; Yang DJ; Yeo S; An HW; Ryoo KH; Park KB
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Nov; 23(11):1283-9. PubMed ID: 22093072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. In vitro and in vivo evaluation of SLA titanium surfaces with further alkali or hydrogen peroxide and heat treatment.
    Zhang EW; Wang YB; Shuai KG; Gao F; Bai YJ; Cheng Y; Xiong XL; Zheng YF; Wei SC
    Biomed Mater; 2011 Apr; 6(2):025001. PubMed ID: 21293055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of biological characteristics of mesenchymal stem cells grown on two different titanium implant surfaces.
    Wang CY; Zhao BH; Ai HJ; Wang YW
    Biomed Mater; 2008 Mar; 3(1):015004. PubMed ID: 18458491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The influence of titanium surfaces in cultures of neonatal rat calvarial osteoblast-like cells: an immunohistochemical study.
    Aybar B; Emes Y; Atalay B; Tanrikulu S; Kaya AS; Işsever H; Ceyhan T; Bilir A
    Implant Dent; 2009 Feb; 18(1):75-85. PubMed ID: 19212240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of implant surface microtopography on osteoblast gene expression.
    Masaki C; Schneider GB; Zaharias R; Seabold D; Stanford C
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2005 Dec; 16(6):650-6. PubMed ID: 16307571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Osteoblast response and osseointegration of a Ti-6Al-4V alloy implant incorporating strontium.
    Park JW; Kim HK; Kim YJ; Jang JH; Song H; Hanawa T
    Acta Biomater; 2010 Jul; 6(7):2843-51. PubMed ID: 20085830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Osteoblastic cell behaviour on different titanium implant surfaces.
    Le Guehennec L; Lopez-Heredia MA; Enkel B; Weiss P; Amouriq Y; Layrolle P
    Acta Biomater; 2008 May; 4(3):535-43. PubMed ID: 18226985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 36.