1335 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23827768)
1. Evaluation of a comprehensive EHR based on the DeLone and McLean model for IS success: approach, results, and success factors.
Bossen C; Jensen LG; Udsen FW
Int J Med Inform; 2013 Oct; 82(10):940-53. PubMed ID: 23827768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Unintended adverse consequences of introducing electronic health records in residential aged care homes.
Yu P; Zhang Y; Gong Y; Zhang J
Int J Med Inform; 2013 Sep; 82(9):772-88. PubMed ID: 23770027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Electronic health records implementation: an evaluation of information system impact and contingency factors.
Nguyen L; Bellucci E; Nguyen LT
Int J Med Inform; 2014 Nov; 83(11):779-96. PubMed ID: 25085286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Measuring the performance of electronic health records: a case study in residential aged care in Australia.
Yu P; Qian S; Yu H; Lei J
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2013; 192():1035. PubMed ID: 23920809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A study of user requests regarding the fully electronic health record system at Seoul National University Bundang Hospital: challenges for future electronic health record systems.
Yoo S; Kim S; Lee S; Lee KH; Baek RM; Hwang H
Int J Med Inform; 2013 May; 82(5):387-97. PubMed ID: 22959193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evidence-based management of ambulatory electronic health record system implementation: an assessment of conceptual support and qualitative evidence.
McAlearney AS; Hefner JL; Sieck C; Rizer M; Huerta TR
Int J Med Inform; 2014 Jul; 83(7):484-94. PubMed ID: 24862893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Developing a theoretical model and questionnaire survey instrument to measure the success of electronic health records in residential aged care.
Yu P; Qian S
PLoS One; 2018; 13(1):e0190749. PubMed ID: 29315323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Usability problems do not heal by themselves: National survey on physicians' experiences with EHRs in Finland.
Kaipio J; Lääveri T; Hyppönen H; Vainiomäki S; Reponen J; Kushniruk A; Borycki E; Vänskä J
Int J Med Inform; 2017 Jan; 97():266-281. PubMed ID: 27919385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Staff expectations for the implementation of an electronic health record system: a qualitative study using normalisation process theory.
McCrorie C; Benn J; Johnson OA; Scantlebury A
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2019 Nov; 19(1):222. PubMed ID: 31727063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Understanding the dynamics of information technology implementation: a study of clinical information systems.
Paré G; Elam JJ
Medinfo; 1995; 8 Pt 1():544. PubMed ID: 8591258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Envisioning electronic health record systems as change management: the experience of an English hospital joining the National Programme for Information Technology.
Takian A
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2012; 180():901-5. PubMed ID: 22874323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [The analysis of physicians' work: announcing the end of attempts at in vitro fertilization].
Santiago-Delefosse M; Cahen F; Coeffin-Driol C
Encephale; 2003; 29(4 Pt 1):293-305. PubMed ID: 14615699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Learning from primary care meaningful use exemplars.
Ornstein SM; Nemeth LS; Nietert PJ; Jenkins RG; Wessell AM; Litvin CB
J Am Board Fam Med; 2015; 28(3):360-70. PubMed ID: 25957369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Qualitative and quantitative evaluation of EHR-integrated mobile patient questionnaires regarding usability and cost-efficiency.
Fritz F; Balhorn S; Riek M; Breil B; Dugas M
Int J Med Inform; 2012 May; 81(5):303-13. PubMed ID: 22236957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Transitioning from a computerized provider order entry and paper documentation system to an electronic health record: expectations and experiences of hospital staff.
Kirkendall ES; Goldenhar LM; Simon JL; Wheeler DS; Andrew Spooner S
Int J Med Inform; 2013 Nov; 82(11):1037-45. PubMed ID: 24041453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Community-based, interdisciplinary geriatric care team satisfaction with an electronic health record: a multimethod study.
Sockolow PS; Bowles KH; Lehmann HP; Abbott PA; Weiner JP
Comput Inform Nurs; 2012 Jun; 30(6):300-11. PubMed ID: 22411417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Anything but engaged: user involvement in the context of a national electronic health record implementation.
Cresswell K; Morrison Z; Crowe S; Robertson A; Sheikh A
Inform Prim Care; 2011; 19(4):191-206. PubMed ID: 22828574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Association of Electronic Health Record Use Above Meaningful Use Thresholds With Hospital Quality and Safety Outcomes.
Murphy ZR; Wang J; Boland MV
JAMA Netw Open; 2020 Sep; 3(9):e2012529. PubMed ID: 32902649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Rates, levels, and determinants of electronic health record system adoption: a study of hospitals in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Aldosari B
Int J Med Inform; 2014 May; 83(5):330-42. PubMed ID: 24560609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Implementation of a nationwide electronic health record (EHR).
Fragidis LL; Chatzoglou PD
Int J Health Care Qual Assur; 2018 Mar; 31(2):116-130. PubMed ID: 29504871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
