These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1332 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23827768)

  • 1. Evaluation of a comprehensive EHR based on the DeLone and McLean model for IS success: approach, results, and success factors.
    Bossen C; Jensen LG; Udsen FW
    Int J Med Inform; 2013 Oct; 82(10):940-53. PubMed ID: 23827768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Unintended adverse consequences of introducing electronic health records in residential aged care homes.
    Yu P; Zhang Y; Gong Y; Zhang J
    Int J Med Inform; 2013 Sep; 82(9):772-88. PubMed ID: 23770027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Electronic health records implementation: an evaluation of information system impact and contingency factors.
    Nguyen L; Bellucci E; Nguyen LT
    Int J Med Inform; 2014 Nov; 83(11):779-96. PubMed ID: 25085286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Measuring the performance of electronic health records: a case study in residential aged care in Australia.
    Yu P; Qian S; Yu H; Lei J
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2013; 192():1035. PubMed ID: 23920809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A study of user requests regarding the fully electronic health record system at Seoul National University Bundang Hospital: challenges for future electronic health record systems.
    Yoo S; Kim S; Lee S; Lee KH; Baek RM; Hwang H
    Int J Med Inform; 2013 May; 82(5):387-97. PubMed ID: 22959193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evidence-based management of ambulatory electronic health record system implementation: an assessment of conceptual support and qualitative evidence.
    McAlearney AS; Hefner JL; Sieck C; Rizer M; Huerta TR
    Int J Med Inform; 2014 Jul; 83(7):484-94. PubMed ID: 24862893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Developing a theoretical model and questionnaire survey instrument to measure the success of electronic health records in residential aged care.
    Yu P; Qian S
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(1):e0190749. PubMed ID: 29315323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Usability problems do not heal by themselves: National survey on physicians' experiences with EHRs in Finland.
    Kaipio J; Lääveri T; Hyppönen H; Vainiomäki S; Reponen J; Kushniruk A; Borycki E; Vänskä J
    Int J Med Inform; 2017 Jan; 97():266-281. PubMed ID: 27919385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Understanding the dynamics of information technology implementation: a study of clinical information systems.
    Paré G; Elam JJ
    Medinfo; 1995; 8 Pt 1():544. PubMed ID: 8591258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Envisioning electronic health record systems as change management: the experience of an English hospital joining the National Programme for Information Technology.
    Takian A
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2012; 180():901-5. PubMed ID: 22874323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [The analysis of physicians' work: announcing the end of attempts at in vitro fertilization].
    Santiago-Delefosse M; Cahen F; Coeffin-Driol C
    Encephale; 2003; 29(4 Pt 1):293-305. PubMed ID: 14615699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Learning from primary care meaningful use exemplars.
    Ornstein SM; Nemeth LS; Nietert PJ; Jenkins RG; Wessell AM; Litvin CB
    J Am Board Fam Med; 2015; 28(3):360-70. PubMed ID: 25957369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Qualitative and quantitative evaluation of EHR-integrated mobile patient questionnaires regarding usability and cost-efficiency.
    Fritz F; Balhorn S; Riek M; Breil B; Dugas M
    Int J Med Inform; 2012 May; 81(5):303-13. PubMed ID: 22236957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Transitioning from a computerized provider order entry and paper documentation system to an electronic health record: expectations and experiences of hospital staff.
    Kirkendall ES; Goldenhar LM; Simon JL; Wheeler DS; Andrew Spooner S
    Int J Med Inform; 2013 Nov; 82(11):1037-45. PubMed ID: 24041453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Community-based, interdisciplinary geriatric care team satisfaction with an electronic health record: a multimethod study.
    Sockolow PS; Bowles KH; Lehmann HP; Abbott PA; Weiner JP
    Comput Inform Nurs; 2012 Jun; 30(6):300-11. PubMed ID: 22411417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Anything but engaged: user involvement in the context of a national electronic health record implementation.
    Cresswell K; Morrison Z; Crowe S; Robertson A; Sheikh A
    Inform Prim Care; 2011; 19(4):191-206. PubMed ID: 22828574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Association of Electronic Health Record Use Above Meaningful Use Thresholds With Hospital Quality and Safety Outcomes.
    Murphy ZR; Wang J; Boland MV
    JAMA Netw Open; 2020 Sep; 3(9):e2012529. PubMed ID: 32902649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Rates, levels, and determinants of electronic health record system adoption: a study of hospitals in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
    Aldosari B
    Int J Med Inform; 2014 May; 83(5):330-42. PubMed ID: 24560609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Implementation of a nationwide electronic health record (EHR).
    Fragidis LL; Chatzoglou PD
    Int J Health Care Qual Assur; 2018 Mar; 31(2):116-130. PubMed ID: 29504871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Interoperability of clinical decision-support systems and electronic health records using archetypes: a case study in clinical trial eligibility.
    Marcos M; Maldonado JA; Martínez-Salvador B; Boscá D; Robles M
    J Biomed Inform; 2013 Aug; 46(4):676-89. PubMed ID: 23707417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 67.