These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
1340 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23827768)
21. Electronic health record: design and implementation of a lab test request module. Gascón F; Herrera I; Vázquez C; Jiménez P; Jiménez J; Real C; Pérez F Int J Med Inform; 2013 Jun; 82(6):514-21. PubMed ID: 23602410 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Evaluation of Electronic Health Record Implementation in Hospitals. Tubaishat A Comput Inform Nurs; 2017 Jul; 35(7):364-372. PubMed ID: 28221186 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Physician experiences transitioning between an older versus newer electronic health record for electronic prescribing. Abramson EL; Patel V; Malhotra S; Pfoh ER; Nena Osorio S; Cheriff A; Cole CL; Bunce A; Ash J; Kaushal R Int J Med Inform; 2012 Aug; 81(8):539-48. PubMed ID: 22465355 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Development of a tripolar model of technology acceptance: Hospital-based physicians' perspective on EHR. Beglaryan M; Petrosyan V; Bunker E Int J Med Inform; 2017 Jun; 102():50-61. PubMed ID: 28495348 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Is it possible for nurses and doctors to form a useful clinical overview of an EHR? Neve K; Kragh Iversen R; Andersen CK Stud Health Technol Inform; 2006; 122():314-9. PubMed ID: 17102271 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Use of and attitudes to a hospital information system by medical secretaries, nurses and physicians deprived of the paper-based medical record: a case report. Laerum H; Karlsen TH; Faxvaag A BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2004 Oct; 4():18. PubMed ID: 15488150 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Comparison of electronic health record system functionalities to support the patient recruitment process in clinical trials. Schreiweis B; Trinczek B; Köpcke F; Leusch T; Majeed RW; Wenk J; Bergh B; Ohmann C; Röhrig R; Dugas M; Prokosch HU Int J Med Inform; 2014 Nov; 83(11):860-8. PubMed ID: 25189709 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks. Jardine C; Hrudey S; Shortreed J; Craig L; Krewski D; Furgal C; McColl S J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev; 2003; 6(6):569-720. PubMed ID: 14698953 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The role of cognitive and learning theories in supporting successful EHR system implementation training: a qualitative study. McAlearney AS; Robbins J; Kowalczyk N; Chisolm DJ; Song PH Med Care Res Rev; 2012 Jun; 69(3):294-315. PubMed ID: 22451617 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Users' perspectives of key factors to implementing electronic health records in Canada: a Delphi study. McGinn CA; Gagnon MP; Shaw N; Sicotte C; Mathieu L; Leduc Y; Grenier S; Duplantie J; Abdeljelil AB; Légaré F BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2012 Sep; 12():105. PubMed ID: 22967231 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Integration of Hospital Information and Clinical Decision Support Systems to Enable the Reuse of Electronic Health Record Data. Kopanitsa G Methods Inf Med; 2017 May; 56(3):238-247. PubMed ID: 28361157 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Bringing service design to the development of health information systems: The case of the Portuguese national electronic health record. Grenha Teixeira J; Pinho NF; Patrício L Int J Med Inform; 2019 Dec; 132():103942. PubMed ID: 31627031 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. User experiences with different regional health information exchange systems in Finland. Hyppönen H; Reponen J; Lääveri T; Kaipio J Int J Med Inform; 2014 Jan; 83(1):1-18. PubMed ID: 24200753 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Staff expectations for the implementation of an electronic health record system: a qualitative study using normalisation process theory. McCrorie C; Benn J; Johnson OA; Scantlebury A BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2019 Nov; 19(1):222. PubMed ID: 31727063 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Constructive eHealth evaluation: lessons from evaluation of EHR development in 4 Danish hospitals. Høstgaard AMB; Bertelsen P; Nøhr C BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2017 Apr; 17(1):45. PubMed ID: 28427407 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Electronic health record acceptance by physicians: testing an integrated theoretical model. Gagnon MP; Ghandour el K; Talla PK; Simonyan D; Godin G; Labrecque M; Ouimet M; Rousseau M J Biomed Inform; 2014 Apr; 48():17-27. PubMed ID: 24184678 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparison of user groups' perspectives of barriers and facilitators to implementing electronic health records: a systematic review. McGinn CA; Grenier S; Duplantie J; Shaw N; Sicotte C; Mathieu L; Leduc Y; Légaré F; Gagnon MP BMC Med; 2011 Apr; 9():46. PubMed ID: 21524315 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Health-related quality of life in early breast cancer. Groenvold M Dan Med Bull; 2010 Sep; 57(9):B4184. PubMed ID: 20816024 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Multidisciplinary user experience of a newly implemented electronic patient record in Ireland: An exploratory qualitative study. Brady AM; Fortune J; Ali AH; Prizeman G; To WT; Courtney G; Stokes K; Roche M Int J Med Inform; 2024 May; 185():105399. PubMed ID: 38430733 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The Practice Impact of Electronic Health Record System Implementation Within a Large Multispecialty Ophthalmic Practice. Singh RP; Bedi R; Li A; Kulkarni S; Rodstrom T; Altus G; Martin DF JAMA Ophthalmol; 2015 Jun; 133(6):668-74. PubMed ID: 25880083 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]