165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23827800)
1. Volumetric response classification in metastatic solid tumors on MSCT: initial results in a whole-body setting.
Wulff AM; Fabel M; Freitag-Wolf S; Tepper M; Knabe HM; Schäfer JP; Jansen O; Bolte H
Eur J Radiol; 2013 Oct; 82(10):e567-73. PubMed ID: 23827800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Lung, liver and lymph node metastases in follow-up MSCT: comprehensive volumetric assessment of lesion size changes.
Wulff AM; Bolte H; Fischer S; Freitag-Wolf S; Soza G; Tietjen C; Biederer J; Heller M; Fabel M
Rofo; 2012 Sep; 184(9):820-8. PubMed ID: 22872601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. MSCT follow-up in malignant lymphoma: comparison of manual linear measurements with semi-automated lymph node analysis for therapy response classification.
Weßling J; Puesken M; Koch R; Kohlhase N; Persigehl T; Mesters R; Heindel W; Buerke B
Rofo; 2012 Sep; 184(9):795-804. PubMed ID: 22618478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical lymph node staging--influence of slice thickness and reconstruction kernel on volumetry and RECIST measurements.
Fabel M; Wulff A; Heckel F; Bornemann L; Freitag-Wolf S; Heller M; Biederer J; Bolte H
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Nov; 81(11):3124-30. PubMed ID: 22464844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Semiautomatic lymph node segmentation in multislice computed tomography: impact of slice thickness on segmentation quality, measurement precision, and interobserver variability.
Buerke B; Puesken M; Beyer F; Gerss J; Weckesser M; Seifarth H; Heindel W; Wessling J
Invest Radiol; 2010 Feb; 45(2):82-8. PubMed ID: 20027120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Three-dimensional lung tumor segmentation from x-ray computed tomography using sparse field active models.
Awad J; Owrangi A; Villemaire L; O'Riordan E; Parraga G; Fenster A
Med Phys; 2012 Feb; 39(2):851-65. PubMed ID: 22320795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Volume-based response evaluation with consensual lesion selection: a pilot study by using cloud solutions and comparison to RECIST 1.1.
Oubel E; Bonnard E; Sueoka-Aragane N; Kobayashi N; Charbonnier C; Yamamichi J; Mizobe H; Kimura S
Acad Radiol; 2015 Feb; 22(2):217-25. PubMed ID: 25488429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Semi-automatic volumetric measurement of lung cancer using multi-detector CT effects of nodule characteristics.
Iwano S; Okada T; Koike W; Matsuo K; Toya R; Yamazaki M; Ito S; Ito J; Naganwa S
Acad Radiol; 2009 Oct; 16(10):1179-86. PubMed ID: 19524456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Size determination and response assessment of liver metastases with computed tomography--comparison of RECIST and volumetric algorithms.
Rothe JH; Grieser C; Lehmkuhl L; Schnapauff D; Fernandez CP; Maurer MH; Mussler A; Hamm B; Denecke T; Steffen IG
Eur J Radiol; 2013 Nov; 82(11):1831-9. PubMed ID: 22717124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Target lesion selection: an important factor causing variability of response classification in the Response Evaluation Criteria for Solid Tumors 1.1.
Keil S; Barabasch A; Dirrichs T; Bruners P; Hansen NL; Bieling HB; Brümmendorf TH; Kuhl CK
Invest Radiol; 2014 Aug; 49(8):509-17. PubMed ID: 24651664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Interobserver agreement of semi-automated and manual measurements of functional MRI metrics of treatment response in hepatocellular carcinoma.
Bonekamp D; Bonekamp S; Halappa VG; Geschwind JF; Eng J; Corona-Villalobos CP; Pawlik TM; Kamel IR
Eur J Radiol; 2014 Mar; 83(3):487-96. PubMed ID: 24387824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Semi-automatic software increases CT measurement accuracy but not response classification of colorectal liver metastases after chemotherapy.
van Kessel CS; van Leeuwen MS; Witteveen PO; Kwee TC; Verkooijen HM; van Hillegersberg R
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Oct; 81(10):2543-9. PubMed ID: 22264447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Response Evaluation of Malignant Liver Lesions After TACE/SIRT: Comparison of Manual and Semi-Automatic Measurement of Different Response Criteria in Multislice CT.
Höink AJ; Schülke C; Koch R; Löhnert A; Kammerer S; Fortkamp R; Heindel W; Buerke B
Rofo; 2017 Nov; 189(11):1067-1075. PubMed ID: 28834965
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Relationship between coronary artery disease and epicardial adipose tissue quantification at cardiac CT: comparison between automatic volumetric measurement and manual bidimensional estimation.
Bastarrika G; Broncano J; Schoepf UJ; Schwarz F; Lee YS; Abro JA; Costello P; Zwerner PL
Acad Radiol; 2010 Jun; 17(6):727-34. PubMed ID: 20363161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Tumor growth kinetics versus RECIST to assess response to locoregional therapy in breast cancer liver metastases.
Seyal AR; Parekh K; Velichko YS; Salem R; Yaghmai V
Acad Radiol; 2014 Aug; 21(8):950-7. PubMed ID: 24833565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Solid, part-solid, or non-solid?: classification of pulmonary nodules in low-dose chest computed tomography by a computer-aided diagnosis system.
Jacobs C; van Rikxoort EM; Scholten ET; de Jong PA; Prokop M; Schaefer-Prokop C; van Ginneken B
Invest Radiol; 2015 Mar; 50(3):168-73. PubMed ID: 25478740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Usefulness of semi-automatic volumetry compared to established linear measurements in predicting lymph node metastases in MSCT.
Buerke B; Gerss J; Puesken M; Weckesser M; Heindel W; Wessling J
Acta Radiol; 2011 Jun; 52(5):540-6. PubMed ID: 21498286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. CT colonography: automated measurement of colonic polyps compared with manual techniques--human in vitro study.
Taylor SA; Slater A; Halligan S; Honeyfield L; Roddie ME; Demeshski J; Amin H; Burling D
Radiology; 2007 Jan; 242(1):120-8. PubMed ID: 17105850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Validating New Software for Semiautomated Liver Volumetry--Better than Manual Measurement?
Noschinski LE; Maiwald B; Voigt P; Wiltberger G; Kahn T; Stumpp P
Rofo; 2015 Sep; 187(9):788-94. PubMed ID: 26085174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Semi-automated volumetric analysis of artificial lymph nodes in a phantom study.
Fabel M; Biederer J; Jochens A; Bornemann L; Soza G; Heller M; Bolte H
Eur J Radiol; 2011 Dec; 80(3):e451-7. PubMed ID: 21094010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]