These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23828648)

  • 1. Resolution acuity versus recognition acuity with Landolt-style optotypes.
    Heinrich SP; Bach M
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2013 Sep; 251(9):2235-41. PubMed ID: 23828648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The visual resolution of Landolt-C optotypes in human subjects depends on their orientation: the 'gap-down' effect.
    Schrauf M; Stern C
    Neurosci Lett; 2001 Feb; 299(3):185-8. PubMed ID: 11165766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Computer monitor pixellation and Landolt C visual acuity.
    Carkeet A; Lister L; Goh YT
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2021 Nov; 41(6):1176-1182. PubMed ID: 34533231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Correlation of optotypes with the Landolt ring--a fresh look at the comparability of optotypes.
    Grimm W; Rassow B; Wesemann W; Saur K; Hilz R
    Optom Vis Sci; 1994 Jan; 71(1):6-13. PubMed ID: 8146001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Auckland Optotypes: An open-access pictogram set for measuring recognition acuity.
    Hamm LM; Yeoman JP; Anstice N; Dakin SC
    J Vis; 2018 Mar; 18(3):13. PubMed ID: 29677328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. What spatial frequency do we use to detect the orientation of a Landolt C?
    Bondarko VM; Danilova MV
    Vision Res; 1997 Aug; 37(15):2153-6. PubMed ID: 9327062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Correlation-based evaluation of visual performance to reduce the statistical error of visual acuity.
    Fülep C; Kovács I; Kránitz K; Erdei G
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2017 Jul; 34(7):1255-1264. PubMed ID: 29036136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The FreiBurger: a new optotype for P300-based acuity estimation.
    Duval CZ; Kaczan SB; Heinrich SP
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38916779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Discrimination of paediatric acuity test optotypes by 6-year-old children.
    Hussaindeen JR; Ramakrishnan B; Ravi A; SundarRaj M; Rakshit A; Nosofsky RM; Candy TR
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2023 Sep; 43(5):964-971. PubMed ID: 37272135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Crowding and visual acuity measured in adults using paediatric test letters, pictures and symbols.
    Lalor SJH; Formankiewicz MA; Waugh SJ
    Vision Res; 2016 Apr; 121():31-38. PubMed ID: 26878696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Event-Related Potentials Allow for Optotype-Based Objective Acuity Estimation.
    Heinrich SP; Lüth I; Bach M
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2015 Apr; 56(4):2184-91. PubMed ID: 25744983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Comparison of visual acuity measurement with Landolt rings versus numbers].
    Rohrschneider K; Spittler AR; Bach M
    Ophthalmologe; 2019 Nov; 116(11):1058-1063. PubMed ID: 30927070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of a visual acuity test using closed Landolt-Cs to determine malingering.
    Kröger N; Jürgens C; Kohlmann T; Tost F
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2017 Dec; 255(12):2459-2465. PubMed ID: 29046952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Comparison of the Lithander (Kolt test) pediatric visual acuity test with the standardized Landolt ring test].
    Cavazos H; Schulz E; Rassow B; Wesemann W
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1990 Oct; 197(4):324-8. PubMed ID: 2280568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of optotypes of Amsterdam Picture Chart with those of Tumbling-E, LEA symbols, ETDRS, and Landolt-C in non-amblyopic and amblyopic patients.
    Engin O; Despriet DD; van der Meulen-Schot HM; Romers A; Slot X; Sang MT; Fronius M; Kelderman H; Simonsz HJ
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2014 Dec; 252(12):2013-20. PubMed ID: 25228066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Optotype and grating visual acuity in preschool children.
    Stiers P; Vanderkelen R; Vandenbussche E
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2003 Sep; 44(9):4123-30. PubMed ID: 12939336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [New DIN and ISO norms for determination of visual acuity].
    Wesemann W; Heinrich SP; Jägle H; Schiefer U; Bach M
    Ophthalmologe; 2020 Jan; 117(1):19-26. PubMed ID: 31346702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Construction and Validation of LEA Hindi Chart: A Multicenter Study.
    Datta S; Varadharajan S; Mazumdar D; Narayanan A; Monira S; Panda S; Hyvärinen L; Satgunam P
    Optom Vis Sci; 2020 May; 97(5):351-359. PubMed ID: 32413007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Contour interaction in the preschool child.
    Fern KD; Manny RE; Davis JR; Gibson RR
    Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1986 May; 63(5):313-8. PubMed ID: 3717283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The development of luminance- and texture-defined form perception during the school-aged years.
    Bertone A; Hanck J; Guy J; Cornish K
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Aug; 48(10):3080-5. PubMed ID: 20600190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.